Insects don't swarm at LED lights
Posted by speckx 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by tw04 1 day ago
I’m guessing he’s confusing the dramatic drop in insect life overall with a change in behavior due to different lights.
Comment by Izmaki 1 day ago
It is quite possible that flies prefer one part of the light spectrum more than another part, but to say in the title that they don’t swarm at LEDs is misleading at best.
Comment by InsidiousWombat 1 day ago
Also the light bulbs have excellent performance at "catching" bugs because they land on hot stuff and die. I had some GU-12 ceiling halogen lights in my previous apartment and the rims were always covered by bugs that decided to land there and as they were hot from halogens, boom, bug destruction machine
Comment by Freestyler_3 1 day ago
Comment by joshspankit 1 day ago
Comment by _heimdall 1 day ago
Comment by Izmaki 20 hours ago
Comment by NamlchakKhandro 1 day ago
Comment by almog 1 day ago
Comment by mitkebes 1 day ago
If you compare an incandescent soft white porch light to a similar brightness soft white led light, you will probably see dramatically more insects at the incandescent bulb. .
Comment by motionlessveloc 1 day ago
> We found that LEDs attracted significantly fewer insects than other light sources, but found no significant difference in attraction between the “cool” and “warm white” LEDs.
Comment by mrheosuper 1 day ago
Comment by nomel 1 day ago
Comment by IAmBroom 21 hours ago
Comment by raxxorraxor 1 day ago
There probably are insects that don't perceive the "thinner" spectrum, but generally it (sadly) isn't true.
Comment by mahboi 1 day ago
Also, not sure about white bulbs, but those color-configurable spotlights definitely emit UV at least when set to anything near blue/purple. They cause certain things to glow. Probably white is doing it too but it's harder to see.
Comment by legitronics 1 day ago
I have a 405nm laser pointer and it makes certain things (any% titanium dioxide) absurdly bright from fluorescence. So you probably aren’t getting UV from those bulbs, but certainly some IR.
Comment by lightedman 1 day ago
Cree, Nichia, et.al. use ~460nm LED with a cerium-doped aluminum-yttrium garnet cover to convert to white light and have done so for at least half a decade. Just a bare look at the spectral output chart from any company will tell you the wavelength of the base emitter, with a MASSIVE output peak centered around 460nm.
Nobody has used UV as a white LED base for well over a decade or more.
Comment by sbierwagen 1 day ago
Comment by mrheosuper 1 day ago
Comment by Dylan16807 1 day ago
Comment by joquarky 21 hours ago
Comment by hk1337 1 day ago
Comment by lightedman 1 day ago
Nope. Blue light just happens to do well at exciting fluorescence in some materials, especially bleached and whitened ones like paper and laundry. 420nm blue light will excite red fluorescence in a ruby. 532nm green will induce BIP in calcite. Certainly no UV present in an upconverted IR laser.
It's not UV.
Comment by poelzi 1 day ago
AFAIK a nonprofit in Germany collected real data over the last decades. Your childhood memories of windscreens full of insects after each trip are true
Comment by FartyMcFarter 1 day ago
I think cars became a lot more aerodynamic which makes comparisons difficult.
When I installed a roof rack on my car, it was full of insects after a trip. I don't know how the amount of insects would compare to decades ago though.
Comment by poelzi 1 day ago
Comment by AlexandrB 1 day ago
Comment by piltdownman 1 day ago
The stats back it up - one long-term tracking project in Denmark found an 80% decline in insect abundance between 1997 and 2017. The 'Bugs Matter' initiative in the UK similarly found that the number of flying insects hitting car license plates dropped by up to 72% in under two decades.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/12/car-spla...
Comment by slibhb 1 day ago
As a counter-anecdote, I bought a house recently and the back yard is basically uninhabitable all summer due to insects. Insects may be less prevalent along some roads due to better drainage.
Another point I'd make is that there's no reason to think insect life should be stable across 30-40 years. Insects are not people. Even aside from climate change, insect population is very dependent on weather patterns.
Comment by gopalv 1 day ago
The thing that insects can see and we don't is the rapid flashing of a PWM power controller.
I wonder if these streetlights have power saving fade-ins as the nightfall approaches instead of clicking on at sunset.
Comment by winrid 1 day ago
Note you can make LEDs dim without PWM via constant current drivers, just less efficient as the duty cycle is 100%, they look much nicer though
Comment by nik282000 1 day ago
anecdote: I work in a factory, we have thousands of light fixtures. The older constant current LED fixtures have lasted a decade, the new PWM driven lights have had a ~1% failure rate.
Comment by skew-aberration 1 day ago
Comment by nik282000 1 day ago
Comment by dchristian 1 day ago
Yes, adding an inductor will fix the problem, but that costs money. Not enough customers are complaining about the light flicker to justify the higher price.
Comment by excannuk 1 day ago
Comment by andai 1 day ago
In those days TV's were big CRT boxes, illuminated by the electron beam which would race across the screen row by row.
A housefly's "refresh rate" on its eyeballs is much higher than that of a human, so the fly wouldn't see an image as we do, but would presumably find it quite relaxing watching the dot of light slowly move across the screen.
Comment by dghughes 1 day ago
Comment by temp123477 1 day ago
Comment by Velocifyer 1 day ago
Comment by dlcarrier 1 day ago
Comment by dghughes 1 day ago
Comment by raverbashing 1 day ago
Anything more modern than that, even if it has a similar case, will use less power
Comment by quickthrowman 1 day ago
This Acuity occ sensor/photocell combo draws 4mA @ 24VDC: https://pdmassets.azureedge.net/library/SS/documents/specshe...
Comment by adolph 1 day ago
However, my mind developed a similar conjecture to your's: what if the common frequencies of PWM occur within a kinetic visual blindspot of insect vision, like human saccades [0] in the novel Blindsight [1], so that insects are not aware of the LED at all?
0. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10991/
1. https://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm#:~:text=%22There...
Comment by bdamm 1 day ago
They've had many generations to evolve alongside all human false light sources. Insect generations are usually pretty short. Perhaps they just find it evolutionary useful to cluster around human sources of light. Presence of human food, liklihood of bumping into other insects of the same species, warmth, etc.
If human sources of light were interfering somehow, they've had hundreds or thousands of generations to breed out that proclivity.
Comment by throwaway198846 1 day ago
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
So, no, not my experience at all.
Comment by hinkley 1 day ago
There are bugs. You photographed bugs. Maybe more than you would have without lights at all, maybe about the same.
Also better lights don’t necessarily mean perfect lights. We do lots of things to reduce harm. Unfortunately sometimes we do them too much and conserve a significant fraction of the original harm by increasing demand.
Comment by andai 1 day ago
I often visit a place full of swallows and mosquitoes. The swallows eat mosquitoes, and the mosquitoes eat me. So when I get bit, I joke I'm feeding the birds.
Comment by edoceo 1 day ago
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by Joel_Mckay 1 day ago
Also different insects are blind to various areas of the spectrum LED lights cover. So you just get different creatures showing up.
An incandescent filament bulb will probably give you warmer color in the deeper reds. Too high of a color temperature at night makes things look odd, and you may not immediately notice the HDR capture is skewed.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000I17G4O
The neutral "Bright White" Philips A19 Ultra Definition Frosted Dimmable LED Bulbs are about as good as you can get with cheap retail consumer E26 bulbs. Still, the weaker reds may to be an issue depending on what you are capturing, and one may have to drop to a lower color-temperature indoor version like "Soft White". =3
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Having a strobe every exposure during a timelapse is annoying though. You'd get run out on a rail at a star party with nonsense like that. Sometimes, it really helps to think about others when doing your own thing and not being an asshat just because you want to do something
Comment by Joel_Mckay 1 day ago
Maybe converting the yellow area of the image into grey scale would give you the highlights, and the color loss could look intentional in moonlight.
There are plenty of intervalometer options around, and even a few Arduino projects for the creative.
Best of luck, =3
Comment by dylan604 18 hours ago
Comment by piskov 1 day ago
Sky is always brighter than the land, moon is not required.
Lamp movement is the confusion of where is “up”
Comment by pasquinelli 1 day ago
Comment by jmpeax 1 day ago
Comment by pasquinelli 1 day ago
take something you know to be true. now come up with a stupid, falacious argument for it. now you can see that seeing an argument is bad doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong.
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Speaking of things being wrong...how can you come to this conclusion? There are many beaches where turtle hatchlings get confused by all of the lights on land where they crawl away from the ocean instead of towards it. Land is so bright, that the vast majority of humans can no longer see the night sky. So again I ask, how do you come to the conclusion that land is darker than the sky?
Comment by quirkot 1 day ago
Comment by worldsavior 1 day ago
Comment by throwaway219450 1 day ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon-wheel_effect
https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/subjective-strobosco...
Comment by qqewqe123 1 day ago
Edit; to be clear there is a version of the wagon wheel effect under natural light, I'm just saying that the main one with discrete exposure periods does not occur irl
Comment by throwaway219450 1 day ago
Have a look at https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.93.8.3693; my point was that there is documented research that says even with continuous illumination and an (apparently) continuous camera (the brain), this happens:
> The illusion of wheels or other radial patterns rotating back- ward in continuous light, together with the perception of supernumerary spokes, suggests that the human visual system processes sequential episodes of information rather than a continuous temporal flow. In addition to accounting for this remarkable illusion, a strategy of vision that parses the world in this way can explain why movies are so realistic (simply because that is the way we normally see things) and how we detect motion (by comparing the position of the same objects in sequential episodes).
Comment by 1718627440 1 day ago
Comment by autoexec 1 day ago
Comment by 1718627440 1 day ago
Comment by autoexec 1 day ago
Comment by stevenwoo 1 day ago
Comment by nine_k 1 day ago
Try walking outside in a clear night. Look up, notice some stars, or aircraft lights. Now rotate in place, and see how low your vision's FPS is in the dark: the rotation will be visibility jumpy.
An insect, with its much simpler visual processing, and facing a bright light, will likely achieve a much higher FPS, sufficient for the sub-kilohertz flicker to be very visible.
Comment by inexcf 1 day ago
Comment by IanCal 1 day ago
Comment by quirkot 1 day ago
Comment by jschveibinz 1 day ago
Comment by andai 1 day ago
I'm told insects are more sensitive in that regard, due to having brains with fewer layers.
Comment by smallmancontrov 1 day ago
Comment by DoctorOetker 1 day ago
Comment by legitronics 1 day ago
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by nkrisc 1 day ago
Comment by Spare_account 1 day ago
Comment by okanat 1 day ago
Comment by hnlmorg 1 day ago
Insects eyes are biologically very different.
With LED lighting, if you have lots of spot lights in the ceiling and and open door, you’ll likely find that the light leaving the house is a bath of reflection from different sources inside the house and that likely cancels out the worst of the flicker.
Comment by recursive 1 day ago
Comment by Brian_K_White 1 day ago
They didn't say no bug ever goes to any led light.
Comment by ninalanyon 1 day ago
Comment by prmoustache 1 day ago
Comment by Brian_K_White 1 day ago
Is it too much to expect super smarty hn developer types to know how to read? Yeah looks like.
Comment by aaron695 1 day ago
Comment by Animats 1 day ago
Comment by somat 1 day ago
Comment by pcdoodle1 1 day ago
Comment by andai 1 day ago
Comment by karim79 1 day ago
When I did this I was in the countryside and I can state without hesitation that the insects loved it and flocked to it and while I found it cute, it was annoying because they would occasionally get trapped in the small gaps between the tiles and get stuck.
I'm therefore 100% convinced that insects just love fancy lighting setups.
Comment by oakwhiz 1 day ago
Comment by actionfromafar 1 day ago
Comment by andai 1 day ago
Comment by joshspankit 1 day ago
Never minding IR and UV, not even a visible-light spectrogram of each light source
Comment by doctoboggan 1 day ago
However when I visit my in laws on the Florida coast, they have “turtle lights” which are required by law to not confuse hatchlings when they first emerge from the sand. These are an orange hue and I noticed that they have way less swarming bugs than a typical street light. So I would say certain frequencies definitely confuse bugs less, but LEDs as a whole seems too broad a category to make that statement.
Comment by dghughes 1 day ago
I wonder if it's not the LED lights they just happen to exist in a time when insects have been nearly wiped out. Or it's just that area of Costa Rica.
I have a white (200W incandescent equivalent) LED light and a lot of bugs swarm it.
Comment by dddddaviddddd 1 day ago
Comment by nxpnsv 1 day ago
Comment by nemo1618 1 day ago
Comment by HeyLaughingBoy 1 day ago
Comment by vondur 1 day ago
Comment by Xcelerate 1 day ago
Comment by krige 1 day ago
Comment by theandrewbailey 1 day ago
Comment by cbg0 1 day ago
Comment by silisili 1 day ago
Comment by aeonfox 1 day ago
^ Obligatory Chubbyemu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VtUGoGZtI8
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by arcfour 1 day ago
Comment by roromainmain 1 day ago
Comment by mcmcmc 1 day ago
Comment by baoooooooooooo 1 day ago
I guess it is most likely some combination of the above, but if there's any evidence it would be a neat reframing
Comment by faidit 1 day ago
Germany: "More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas" https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
Puerto Rico: "dry weight biomass of arthropods captured in sweep samples had declined 4 to 8 times, and 30 to 60 times in sticky traps." https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1722477115
Comment by HelloMcFly 1 day ago
Comment by amelius 1 day ago
Comment by HelloMcFly 1 day ago
I can say with absolute and total confidence that the phenomenon of insect splatter was a common - if not frequent - daytime experience. I've not experienced this phenomenon in decades.
Comment by Angostura 1 day ago
Comment by mahboi 1 day ago
Comment by r721 1 day ago
Comment by filoeleven 1 day ago
That was a surprise to me! I checked out the Wikipedia article to see if it said "lower numbers are attributed to more aerodynamic windshields," because as a former Scion xB driver for 15+ years I saw the number of splats drop quite a lot. The area I lived in was undergoing a massive shift from farmland to housing developments too though, so I couldn't extrapolate further.
Comment by calt 1 day ago
Comment by filoeleven 1 day ago
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/12/car-spla...
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by jkahrs595 1 day ago
Comment by lakeviewterrace 1 day ago
I bought LED "bug lights" — those yellow bulbs that are supposed to be invisible to bugs.
Every bulb in the pack electrically failed within 10 minutes.
I gave up and went back to an incandescent. Still works perfectly.
So sick of the zero-quality LED bulbs that have entirely flooded the market. Of course they had their hand forced by government mandates, people needed mass quantities of cheap bulbs that could match a 75¢ incandescent. They didn't have this problem when LED bulbs were $20 each (and weighed about as much, due to the heat sink).
Comment by AmazingEveryDay 1 day ago
Comment by fransje26 1 day ago
The leds do, but the "low-quality" electronic drivers do not and die first. Often well before the advertised lifespan.
Comment by mikestew 1 day ago
Tell that to my 10 year old Philipps Hue lights. I wonder if there is some other quality at work that would explain the difference...
Comment by lakeviewterrace 1 day ago
Comment by dylan604 1 day ago
Comment by lakeviewterrace 1 day ago
Comment by ChrisMarshallNY 1 day ago
Comment by caymanjim 1 day ago
Comment by unpleasurable 1 day ago
Comment by officeplant 1 day ago
We use UV/IR combo Flame detectors at work for this purpose.
Comment by bell-cot 1 day ago
Comment by devindotcom 1 day ago
Comment by metalman 1 day ago
Comment by aaomidi 1 day ago
Comment by LorenPechtel 18 hours ago
Comment by anthk 1 day ago
Comment by skeezyboi 1 day ago
Comment by shmerl 1 day ago
Comment by bob1029 1 day ago
Comment by speransky 1 day ago
Comment by minfazhai 1 day ago