Tesla profits drop 43% in Q3
Posted by throw0101a 10 hours ago
Comments
Comment by free_bip 8 hours ago
Comment by libertine 3 hours ago
- far right politics;
- helping Russia killing Ukrainian civilians;
- and threatening the livelihood of Europeans;
These might also help people decide to look somewhere else.
Comment by chii 2 hours ago
The last holdout being the USA, where the gov't is preferentially giving tesla their marketshare instead of letting open competition work in favour of consumers.
But like japanese cars, this will eventually also take root.
Comment by locknitpicker 7 hours ago
Rigging a car to do a flip is a clear way to tell the world they officially ran out of ideas and are desperate to get a sale.
Comment by esperent 6 hours ago
It's like everyone has completely forgotten Musk was up on stage with the US president doing nazi salutes just a couple of years as ago.
Comment by crote 3 hours ago
The same applies with the "sex sells" epidemic of the early 2000s: sure, the numbers showed that it was a great way to make people remember your ad, but they forgot to take into account that people remember the boobs and completely miss the brand.
I remember seeing snippets of the "flying car" going around on social media, so it clearly made an impression on me. I think it was supposed to be a Roadster relaunch? Release date? No idea. Price? No idea. Range? No idea. Number of seats? No idea. Cargo capacity? No idea. I bet it won't actually ship with those "rockets", though. Sooo, "clown makes car mockup fly"?
If you're going to do a stunt, at least do it properly. Like Volvo suspending an entire dump truck from a crane[0].
Comment by ZeroGravitas 3 hours ago
A real burn-your-boats moment so there's no chance of them working together again after that.
Comment by impendia 1 hour ago
Much of this money is going to Texas, and James Talarico (the Democratic candidate there) has not been shy about accusing Musk of trying to buy the election.
Sure, flying cars are cool. But I don't get the impression that Musk's politics have been forgotten at all.
Comment by agos 4 hours ago
Comment by pvaldes 3 hours ago
The problem is that people keep lying to themselves about the definition of the word sentient.
1) Cars use all kind of sensors to collect info about the real world.
They measure how much air is entering the motor in real time. They know if the rear left tire is deflated. They detect when they need to be feed with gas, they know the oil pressure and the ECU, the car's brain, is collecting all this info in real time via its "neurons", the BUS cable.
2) Cars react to this information constantly taking the measures appropriated to assure that the preservation of the car functions.
The ECU sends orders in real time to inject X gas into the motor to match Y liters of air in a perfect mix. The motor enters in panic mode and stops the power temporarily.
3) Cars communicate with their drivers
They send a warning to put more gas, or beep because they detected an obstacle behind them or that the seat belt is not being used.
Cars have lots of sophisticated electric sensors to sense the world so, like amoebas or plum trees, they fit perfectly into the definition of the word sentient
Using sentient as a cheaper synonym of self-conscious is moving the goalposts and a self-scam.
Comment by roryirvine 2 hours ago
So whilst a car's ability to sense and react to its environment may be at least as sophisticated as that of a plum tree, it's hard to see how it would meet the legal threshold for sentience in the same way that, say, a lobster does.
More to the point - if Musk genuinely believes that his cars are capable of suffering, why isn't he doing anything to prevent them from being harmed?
Comment by pvaldes 28 minutes ago
Most important question for a small group of people in a philosophical and quasi-religious movement that unilaterally redefined the term to fit their agenda.
Millions of scientists don't feel that pain is so special as to receive special treatment. Is just one of our type of sensors. Not more important than to be able to see, to taste or to hear. Definitely not more important than be able to reproduce. And there is a lot of pain involved in how mammals enter in the world.
The idea that to chop a tree is more moral than to kill a mosquito is totally random and alienated from biological reality.
Comment by otterley 8 hours ago
Comment by alexgoodhart 8 hours ago
Comment by Mobius01 7 hours ago
Comment by not_a_bot_4sho 6 hours ago
But it comes with Elon, so I drive a Rivian.
Comment by bikvfeee 4 hours ago
Comment by AuthAuth 1 hour ago
Comment by wodenokoto 6 hours ago
Comment by NewJazz 5 hours ago
Comment by maigret 5 hours ago
Comment by soraminazuki 3 hours ago
Comment by itzprime 4 hours ago
Comment by esFran 4 hours ago
MANY EVs sold by renamed automakers, and even good chinese brands.
Comment by esFran 4 hours ago
Comment by gla67890543 8 hours ago
Comment by maerF0x0 7 hours ago
Comment by drtgh 4 hours ago
PS: I am not parent commenter, and this separately to the famous gesture with the arm that E.M. did, what can be guessed that harmed the sales.
Comment by dmitrygr 7 hours ago
What is the scam? I do not like EVs and do not own a Tesla car, but Tesla does make them, they do work, and people do like them. Theranos, by comparison, never delivered (nor could deliver) what they promised. So I am not sure I get your comparison.
Comment by slau 6 hours ago
There’s also DOGE and all the related stock manipulation that happened, the tweet promising funding to take TSLA private which obviously made people buy the stock, the ru[n|i]ning of Twitter for political gain, the creation of teams in Tesla to convince owners not to come investigate battery/range issues under warranty, etc.
Probably not quite to Theranos levels, but I can see the pattern.
Comment by Dylan16807 4 hours ago
Comment by locknitpicker 2 hours ago
Gentle reminder that Tesla itself opted to call Tesla's sham of a FSD as "Tesla assisted driving" after regulators from multiple European countries made it very clear that at best ist assists drivers and still require drivers to never take their attention off the road.
Comment by Dig1t 4 hours ago
Comment by panick21_ 3 hours ago
And people on Hardware 3 should collectively sue, because they will never, ever, ever, ever get FSD fully working on that. But instead of admiting that and paying people back (if they want) they continue to release small updates to pretendent its still possible. Musk is known for not giving a shit of supporting old shit, he looks at only the future always.