Chicago O'Hare digs up 50-ton boulder under airfield, asks public for name ideas
Posted by Stratoscope 3 days ago
Comments
Comment by cmrx64 3 days ago
here’s a picture of the actual rock - and digger! phew!
Comment by Stratoscope 3 days ago
> Over the years, Pitelka has rescued some of these rocks and deposited them at his mom’s five-acre property, including a large hunk of limestone that, when he dumped it out of his truck, split in half to reveal a perfect trilobite fossil, convex on one side and a matching imprint on the other.
> “I was so excited to hear that the right people got involved,” he said. “I’m absolutely ecstatic it’s going to be on display. For me, as an (excavator) who loves boulders, it’s the coolest thing that people understand its historical significance and appreciate it.”
Comment by cr125rider 2 days ago
Comment by elcritch 2 days ago
Comment by MisterTea 2 days ago
Comment by mathgenius 2 days ago
Comment by xnx 2 days ago
Comment by Bluestein 2 days ago
Comment by ComputerGuru 2 days ago
Comment by Am4TIfIsER0ppos 2 days ago
Comment by cmrx64 2 days ago
Comment by aktenlage 3 days ago
Comment by matthewsinclair 3 days ago
Comment by samgranieri 2 days ago
But as a resident of the Chicago area, I’m partial to Da Rock
Comment by aceazzameen 2 days ago
Da Rocky McRockface
Comment by tanseydavid 2 days ago
Comment by senectus1 2 days ago
Comment by Mountain_Skies 2 days ago
Comment by underdeserver 2 days ago
Comment by tjwebbnorfolk 2 days ago
Comment by Stratoscope 3 days ago
• Sweet Stone Chicago
• No ORDinary Rock
• Chicago Rocks
• O'Rock
• Orchard Rock
• Da Rock
"No ORDinary Rock" and "Orchard Rock" are the winners for me. They both pay tribute to how O'Hare got its IATA airport code in the 1940s, when it was called Orchard Field.So deciding between the two, Orchard Rock is my pick! It's subtle, but the plaque can explain it.
Comment by swingandamiss 2 days ago
Comment by lbriner 2 days ago
Then in generations to some, old people can explain that Dwayne Johnson was the King of Wrestling and then became King of Hollywood.
Comment by adzm 2 days ago
Comment by jhatax 2 days ago
Comment by robotnikman 2 days ago
Comment by firesteelrain 2 days ago
Comment by phlakaton 2 days ago
Comment by whycome 2 days ago
ORD as an acronym? O Rock D
O’Hare Rock Dolostone O’Hare Runway Dolomite
Rocky.
Da Dolo
Comment by jhatax 2 days ago
Comment by wpm 2 days ago
Comment by deepspace 2 days ago
Comment by toddmorey 2 days ago
Comment by RaftPeople 2 days ago
Comment by lenerdenator 2 days ago
"Alright sooperfyans, next question. Who would win: Coach Ditka, or a 50-ton boulder flying down da side of a mountain?"
"Oh, dat's easy, Dit..."
"Hold ahhhn, hold ahhhn! Da boulder is also named 'Ditka'."
Comment by atreat 2 days ago
Comment by anonymousDan 2 days ago
Comment by JoeAltmaier 2 days ago
Because, we so often take it for granite.
Comment by bell-cot 2 days ago
Comment by syspec 2 days ago
I had no idea that would be rare, what makes it relatively rare?
Comment by firesteelrain 2 days ago
Comment by bcaulfield 3 days ago
Comment by cestith 3 days ago
Comment by ternaryoperator 2 days ago
Comment by crisnoble 2 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 2 days ago
Chicago was covered by ice during the most recent glaciation, which means that boulder is probably a glacial erratic covered by till leftover from the movement of the glacier.
Comment by rags2riches 2 days ago
Glacial erratics are everywhere in Scandinavia, which also obviously was covered by the ice. Small ones, like in the article, are scattered all over. Large ones weigh thousands of tons and may often be mistaken for bedrock.
I suspect there are other areas in North America where that's also true.
Comment by quickthrowman 1 day ago
Comment by kristianp 2 days ago
Comment by waltbosz 2 days ago
I'm speaking in volume. I'm not sure of the mass of these boulders.
Comment by Yizahi 2 days ago
Comment by fuzzfactor 2 days ago
Comment by hoppyhoppy2 2 days ago
Comment by tptacek 2 days ago
Comment by chrismcb 2 days ago
Comment by SideburnsOfDoom 2 days ago
FYI, this refers to "Large boulder the size of a small boulder" in 2020
Comment by thehappypm 2 days ago
Comment by fuzzfactor 2 days ago
Comment by PyWoody 2 days ago
Comment by stutstev 2 days ago
Comment by PyWoody 2 days ago
[0] https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2017-11-03/you-asked-we-answere...
Comment by codethief 2 days ago
TIL there's something called a short ton.
Comment by defrost 2 days ago
For those of us elsewhere on the globe it's that non metric weight we call either a short ton or a US ton.
The OG ton, also known as the imperial ton or British ton is some 2,240 avoirdupois pounds that's been "standardised" (plus minus some obscure fuzzing) for some 700 years or so.
Comment by lukeify 2 days ago
Comment by toddmorey 2 days ago
Comment by contingencies 2 days ago
PS. If visiting Chicago check out the Lincoln Park Conservatory, an amazing historic plant collection with one of the world's best ferneries, very close to downtown. https://www.lincolnparkconservancy.org/projects/conservatory...
Comment by huxley 2 days ago
Comment by entrope 2 days ago
Comment by mindslight 3 days ago
Comment by acomjean 3 days ago
https://www.outdoors.org/resources/amc-outdoors/history/hist...
In “original” England they did as well.
Comment by mindslight 2 days ago
The walls of stones were the result of collecting stones that were near the surface from what I understand (maybe plow depth). I was talking more like bigger stones that were buried several feet under the ground that could just stay where they are (when you fill in the hole), but for a compulsion to treat them as things.
Comment by acomjean 3 days ago
In “original” England they did as well.
Comment by karlkloss 3 days ago
Comment by wffurr 2 days ago
Comment by whycome 2 days ago
Maybe that’s too Philadelphia.
O’Hare “Rocky” Dolomite
Comment by markstos 2 days ago
Comment by mikewarot 3 days ago
Comment by JoeAltmaier 2 days ago
Comment by pvaldes 2 days ago
Comment by dbcurtis 2 days ago
Comment by nyc_data_geek 2 days ago
Comment by jsd1982 2 days ago
Comment by isolay 2 days ago
Comment by MadrasTh0rn 2 days ago
Comment by MBCook 2 days ago
Comment by shmilia 2 days ago
Comment by mrlonglong 2 days ago
Comment by lifeisstillgood 2 days ago
Comment by ashton314 2 days ago
Comment by wewewedxfgdf 2 days ago
Comment by AmazingEveryDay 2 days ago
Comment by rags2riches 2 days ago
Comment by futuresoonpast 2 days ago
Comment by willmadden 2 days ago
Comment by wewewedxfgdf 2 days ago
Comment by pfdietz 2 days ago
Comment by powerbroker 3 days ago
Comment by Stratoscope 3 days ago
Comment by powerbroker 3 days ago
Comment by Stratoscope 3 days ago
Comment by aaron695 3 days ago
Comment by dhosek 2 days ago
Comment by poontangpoo 2 days ago
Comment by hal-eisen 2 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_impact_of_The_Colbert...
Comment by tptacek 2 days ago
Comment by dhosek 2 days ago
Comment by tptacek 2 days ago
Comment by dhosek 2 days ago
Comment by nonethewiser 2 days ago