There's a high chance of devices being sold with GrapheneOS preinstalled in 2027
Posted by Cider9986 5 hours ago
Comments
Comment by microtonal 5 hours ago
- This is about preinstallation. For the planned models, you can install GrapheneOS yourself. This should be really simple, if it is similar to the current installation process for Pixels, which can be fully completed through their website.
- The preinstalled devices don't seem from Motorola themselves, as mentioned later in the thread: Probably not via their website but rather another company provided with the devices directly by Motorola. It could be us doing it ourselves but we aren't set up to deal with it.
Really excited for the Motorola GrapheneOS phones! (Currently have a P10P with GrapheneOS.)
Comment by ysnp 4 hours ago
Comment by Peacefulz 4 hours ago
Comment by snapplebobapple 3 hours ago
Comment by AmazingEveryDay 3 hours ago
Comment by robocat 2 hours ago
If you wish to steal from someone, select from a population of thieves since they won't go to the police (although they may use illegal means to punish you).
Going with the stereotype that people doing illegal things prefer a secure OS (and are not smart enough to pick a safe source).
Comment by palata 1 hour ago
Comment by preisschild 2 hours ago
Comment by EmbarrassedHelp 2 hours ago
Comment by palata 1 hour ago
My hope is that Motorola will be very successful with that. GrapheneOS currently has half a million users and growing. The more users it gets, the more interesting it is for manufacturers to actually consider it.
Google being Google, if Motorola gets a relatively cheap phone to run GrapheneOS (the flagship is quite expensive IMHO), I think people will flock away from Pixels (I definitely will, and I will tell everyone and their dog that they should when they renew their phone).
Comment by bitpush 1 hour ago
That is a total install base right? Unless all 500k of them are upgrading yearly, this number is miniscule. You are underestimating the R&D required to put out a new phone each year only to have 30% (high estimate) of users buying it. That's 150k devices, which is not worth any volume.
Comment by palata 1 hour ago
Also I am genuinely interested: is it that hard to meet GrapheneOS' requirements? Feels like it shouldn't take years of R&D for every new iteration. And also that it's about getting the right deals with the suppliers, which is not really an R&D issue?
Comment by Cider9986 5 hours ago
The 2026 Signature, in the UK, is $1460 USD. In Brazil it is selling for $1230. The Pixel 11 pro XL, which the Signature beats on hardware in practically every way sells for $1300 on Google's website.
It looks interesting... I didn't love the 2026 design [1] but it looks better than whatever this is. Here's pictures:
[1] https://www.motorola.com/gb/en/p/phones/motorola-signature/s...
Comment by asdff 5 hours ago
Comment by SapporoChris 5 hours ago
Comment by bityard 4 hours ago
Comment by hirako2000 3 hours ago
Comment by avree 2 hours ago
AppleCare specifically covers water damage of any kind, and is what I would assume OP would be referring to as a "premium warranty and repair service".
Comment by hirako2000 1 hour ago
ApplecCare is as much a warranty as their Apple's phone are guaranteed waterproof.
It's marketing.
The 3 year warranty add-ons is an insurance. One can get an insurance for any device.
Comment by Lord_Zero 5 hours ago
And if you truly are ultra budget $300 phone guy then sure this doesn't apply to you.
Comment by SoftTalker 5 hours ago
Comment by microtonal 5 hours ago
I update pretty frequently, but all the older devices get used by family members, etc.
Comment by asdff 4 hours ago
Comment by SoftTalker 5 hours ago
Comment by microtonal 5 hours ago
I hope that a few years down the line there will also be great midrange Motorola phones with GrapheneOS support. But they have to start somewhere.
Comment by armadyl 1 hour ago
Comment by iteria 5 hours ago
I just keep buying phones with way more features than I desire just so that having too many apps open at once or going to the wrong Javascript laden web page doesn't slow my phone to a crawl. I just tell myself that at least I only replace my phone every 5 to 7 years. If it wasn't for work, I'd keep them longer, but the OS has to be patched for work stuff to be on it.
Comment by drnick1 4 hours ago
The Pixel phones are precisely that, and they are the only phones supported by Graphene for now. The a-series is a particularly good value and I am posting from one.
Comment by autoexec 1 hour ago
Comment by SoftTalker 5 hours ago
I think if work demands a better phone, then work should be buying you a better phone.
Comment by jrochkind1 5 hours ago
but they bumped up prices significantly a few months ago due to chip prices or tarrifs or who knows what, it's not so cheap anymore.
Comment by bossyTeacher 2 hours ago
Comment by asdff 5 hours ago
In my experience this is literally the iphone SE. Look at the chipset, its no slouch.
Comment by bityard 4 hours ago
Over decades of buying Android devices, I have yet to pay more than $300 for one. The one I'm using was actually free in exchange for buying a year of T-Mobile prepaid credits. No, it never was the fastest thing on the planet but it makes calls and runs the apps I want.
Comment by fmajid 2 hours ago
Miniaturization costs, and I would expect a flagship phone to cost at least as much as an equivalent CPU/RAM/storage laptop. The cost of miniaturization, modem, camera and OLED more than balances the bigger screen and keyboard/trackpad.
Comment by dcminter 4 hours ago
I could see myself splashing out on a more expensive phone if it were less locked down - so probably never. However I don't play games and as a Gen-Xer my laptop is where the rest of my digital life lives; it makes sense that those for whom the phone is their primary device would prioritise it more (especially with somewhat predatory financing).
Comment by franczesko 4 hours ago
That said, I will keep on replacing the battery until the circuit board itself turns into ash
Comment by hirako2000 3 hours ago
But our appreciation keep getting skewed because flagship phones make leaps forward.
Comment by deaton 3 hours ago
Comment by echelon_musk 5 hours ago
Comment by officeplant 4 hours ago
Comment by _aavaa_ 5 hours ago
Comment by horsawlarway 5 hours ago
It just puts Google in the same sandbox Google puts everyone else.
Typing this on a pixel running graphene.
Comment by drnick1 5 hours ago
Yes, you can do that, but Graphene is probably best used without Google apps at all. If you use Google Maps, sandboxed or not, Google still knows where you are, what speed you drive, etc, and can rat you out to car insurance companies or the government.
Comment by microtonal 5 hours ago
That totally depends on your goals. For some it's security, for some it's privacy from Google, for some it's removing the ability from Google to (worst case) remote brick/block your device. The latter may sound a bit far fetched, but if I was employed by, say the ICJ, I would know what system I'd run to avoid that.
One of the things that I like about GrapheneOS is that it accommodates all these use cases and on a gradient (e.g. personally privacy from Google is also important, but I like that I can use sandboxed Google Play Services with most of its permissions removed).
Comment by cherryteastain 5 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 4 hours ago
Can you provide a source that they've said this recently? This seems to be a bit of a misrepresentation.
They say:
>The Play Store app is also the most secure way to install and update apps from the Play Store.
on /usage, but this does not indicate it's the most private way or that it's the recommended way to install apps. It seems to me to indicate that this is their assessment of the security of the ways to install apps that are distributed on the Play Store, not a recommendation or privacy assessment that applies to other apps or to their users in general.
They don't recommend against Aurora Store [1], but it is not user friendly as the Play Store because app installs frequently fail and automatic updates do not work as well. Installing apps from Aurora has the advantage of no google account, but Google is still handed a list of all the apps you have installed, IP address, app details, device details, and GSF ID. It will likely stop working or become even more broken. It is useful when apps block installs from the Play Store because of play integrity.
I use it myself for the few Google apps I install like Camera because I don't want to install play services.
I would consider their actual recommendation to be their own App Store and Accrescent (alpha).
Obtainium is great but not user friendly.
The claims about problems with F-Droid are true. It's not like they oppose FOSS, their whole operating system is FOSS and they've never said anything bad about IzzyOnDroid, which fixes the problems with F-Droid and even adds a bit of security.
[1] https://nitter.freedit.eu/GrapheneOS/search?f=tweets&q=auror...
Comment by Cider9986 5 hours ago
Comment by ledoge 4 hours ago
~750€ for the Motorola Signature, with 512 GB storage
~900€ for the Pixel 10 Pro XL, with 256 GB storage (the 11 Pro XL costs much more at ~1200€, since it just came out a month ago)
Comment by fph 4 hours ago
Comment by _ink_ 5 hours ago
Get your update process working @Motorola!
Comment by _ink_ 1 hour ago
Comment by GuinansEyebrows 3 hours ago
Comment by csdreamer7 1 hour ago
Comment by gfrecvh 1 hour ago
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 3 hours ago
Comment by penguin_booze 2 hours ago
Comment by palata 1 hour ago
The only way a bank cares is if enough users complain and leave for another bank. Banks (like all companies, but especially banks) care about money and nothing else.
Comment by sigmar 4 hours ago
I presume this bit is because Motorola can't sell devices with android builds that aren't certified by google (as per Google Mobile Services contracts)
Comment by movsx 5 hours ago
Comment by ciferkey 5 hours ago
The official GrapheneOS docs contains a developer guide on how to fix banking apps when they are not working. Bank app developers have been surprisingly receptive to making the changes, weirdly enough. You can see in some of the issues tracked on the site where people reached out and the developers eventually made the apps work.
I've been running GrapheneOS for a while (I have posts on the blog in my bio if you want to see some day-to-day info) and only one bank app gave me trouble. I had to toggle a setting and then everything worked.
Separate from this is wallet and payment apps which still have not had much traction on GrapheneOS.
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago
I've heard some people had good results by going to their bank branch and demanding them to unblock their phone or they'll close their account. Apparently they have a checkbox to disable phone attestation requirements for a customer.
Comment by chneu 4 hours ago
So anyone reading this, be aware your experience may differ.
I'm on a pixel 10 pro and have never been able to get some of banking apps to work, despite the list saying they should.
Comment by estebank 4 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 5 hours ago
Curve works in Europe and Paypal has a trial thing in Germany for tap to pay IIRC. There's nothing in the US unfortunately, yet.
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 3 hours ago
Cash and Monero are private so they're in a different space and are what should be prioritized.
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 5 hours ago
GrapheneOS has convinced apps to add compatibility. Hell, Roblox has official GrapheneOS support. The idea is to get more users in order to convince the very few apps that block GrapheneOS, to support it.
Comment by drnick1 5 hours ago
Comment by microtonal 5 hours ago
At any rate, there is a well-maintained list here: https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compa...
Comment by adikso 3 hours ago
Comment by qurren 5 hours ago
I don't regularly use an actual bank account anymore, the cash management solutions from these brokerages work great and can do everything including direct deposit, payments, wire transfers, and ATM/debit cards, and have SIPC protection in place of FDIC.
Comment by armadyl 4 hours ago
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 3 hours ago
https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/is...
Comment by wing-_-nuts 4 hours ago
Comment by lawn 5 hours ago
Comment by EmbarrassedHelp 2 hours ago
Comment by Pfhortune 5 hours ago
That said, the website still works fine for that one.
Comment by madduci 5 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 4 hours ago
So, 7a at your pricepoint:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/820099695470
But, it's only supported for 1.6 more years.
So that puts it at $143 per year of support. While the 10a [1] will be supported for 6.4 more years, which puts it at $55 per year of support.
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago
Comment by dvh 2 hours ago
Comment by Joel_Mckay 2 hours ago
Comment by FlowingRiver 2 hours ago
I had a low end Oppo 'something', I remember the RAM had a 16bit data bus, the whole thing had a peak theoretical bandwidth at just over 4GB/sec. That phone sauntered through the workload at the best of times. The Mediatek chip was probably not the weaklink for once.
On the upside the battery could go well over a week between charges.
Comment by Joel_Mckay 2 hours ago
Xiaomi and Huawei will likely adapt their supply chains accordingly. =3
Comment by monegator 4 hours ago
i really like the pixels, and haven't been fond of motorolas in recent years
Comment by hiitsmyaccount 3 hours ago
Comment by excalibur 3 hours ago
Comment by preisschild 2 hours ago
If they use Google SafetyNet to basically block everything non-Google-certified™ then no.
Comment by seany 5 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 4 hours ago
Comment by ysnp 3 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 3 hours ago
Considering Motorola is doing a lot of the porting, I would guess it will be improved or will be easy.
Comment by underlipton 2 hours ago
I will also accept "Sending my consciousness back to my 2016 body." Better yet, 1996. Got some things I wanna fix.
Comment by ck2 4 hours ago
now give me a device with a mechanical switch that gaps the radio power physically
Comment by metalman 5 hours ago
Comment by hiitsmyaccount 3 hours ago
Did you mean "than"?
I love Linux (been using it as my daily desktop for decades), but we're a long ways off from a true Linux phone.
Comment by mitxela 3 hours ago