Recreating Voodoo Graphics and a Late-1990s Gaming PC on an FPGA

Posted by zdw 11 hours ago

Comments

Comment by jumploops 5 hours ago

In case it's helpful to anyone, MiSTer is a project[0] that recreates classic computers and video game consoles on hardware.

What do I mean by hardware?

Rather than emulating the device in software, which can cause various issues (especially related to timing), by mapping the actual device logic to a field programmable gate array (FPGA), you can achieve an "exact" replica of the hardware.

It's a super cool project, and I highly recommend checking it out if you have an interest in old machines (Apple II, Commodore 64, etc.).

[0]https://mister-devel.github.io/MkDocs_MiSTer/

Comment by mitxela 22 minutes ago

"exact" is still in quotation marks because things like open bus behavior still have to be explicitly simulated. It's still a very accurate simulator, not an exact replica - much more accurate than most fast software simulators can be, though.

Comment by unwind 3 hours ago

Do note that this very cool project does not run on the "default" MiSTer hardware. This board is $250 from AMD.

Comment by jumploops 2 hours ago

It's been awhile, but I believe the "default" MiSTer board is the DE10-Nano[0], which was released ~10-15 years ago?

Looks like Intel (prev Terasic) is still selling them but they're now around $300, they used to be under $150 if memory serves.

If I were jumping into this today, I'd prefer the much more powerful KV260[1] from the blog post over the DE10-Nano, that board was limited!

[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-tech...

[1]https://www.amd.com/en/products/system-on-modules/kria/k26/k...

Sidenote: somewhat sad to see the consolidation into Intel and AMD, but FPGAs have always been second class citizens in the silicon space :(

Comment by pipes 1 hour ago

Does mister work with kv260 boards "out of the box" or is the official mister target a de10 nano? (I love my mister, assembled oneba few years ago). I don't follow the project closely due to zero free time these days

Comment by utopiah 5 hours ago

Damn there is a whole ecosystem around that, e.g. https://ultimatemister.com to buy it all built, very neat.

Comment by charcircuit 2 hours ago

Both require having an understanding of what you are trying to emulate. There are systems which don't have an accurate specification so they are not implemented bug free.

Comment by monster_truck 4 hours ago

I mowed lawns for two summers to save up for a Voodoo 3000 PCI, still didn't even have half of what I needed. Parents covered the rest. Basically nothing I had hoped to be able to play worked. Spent an entire summer just trying to get Arcanum to even run, never did succeed. Learned a whole lot.

Goddamn if that buyer's remorse didn't scar me for life, the amount of researching I did before any purchase from then on was obsessive. I still think of the card fondly for what it represented to 10 year old me. This story does have a happy ending, we ended up getting a Dell XPS not long after with a Pentium 3 & a GeForce 2, back when they were still beige.

Comment by crq-yml 2 hours ago

This is exactly how it was back then, roughly from when the 386-based PC clones appeared up through Windows 7. The best thing you could do was ask the local computer stores about what configurations they were building, since they got to see more hardware come through. But they struggled too. The system the store built for me in 2001 had an Athlon Thunderbird running 1.4GHz and cooling tech hadn't caught up so it hit the failsafe temps during long sessions of Counter-Strike and Serious Sam. Later, wiser me eventually figured out, two computers later, that the power supply was probably the culprit, but this wasn't much of a topic of discussion yet - power supply efficiency wasn't a priority in the 90's.

Comment by cjrp 46 minutes ago

I remember exactly that feeling; I had a cricket game where my PC met the minimum specs, but it ran terribly. That's the day I learned that minimum is not enough.

Comment by userbinator 3 hours ago

It seems that within the past few years, there have been a great increase in the number of articles on low-level GPU internals/programming, which was previously a very niche subject. However, once you understand that a GPU is conceptually a processor specialised for graphics operations, with its own instruction set and RAM, then everything seems quite straightforward, and you can actually start thinking about how to implement one.

The specification is a behavioral target, rather than a circuit diagram.

Did anyone else get a slight feeling of LLM-ism from that sentence? Not a complaint, because I've noticed AI is definitely leading to some great boosts (the somewhat related https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49717638 is on the front page as I write this.)

Comment by shoobiedoo 8 hours ago

So bummed out that I wrecked the HDMI out on my MiSTer. I was trying to figure out a new monitor layout and unplugged/plugged it in a few times. I could SSH into it no problem, but no HDMI out. After peeking around on the forums, turns out that the MiSTer doesn't take kindly to that while it's still on-- I forget the technical reason. Oh well. Many, many hours of fun playing games with my son on the it, I got my money's worth.

Comment by hexapus 8 hours ago

Dunno which variant you bought, but the QMTech mister clones on Ali Express are affordable, work perfectly well, and come with the expanded 128MB SDRAM expansion and analog I/O board bundled up in a convenient case. I have 2 of them, along with the MiSTer Pi, and I'll probably pick up a couple more for dedicated applicaitons (3d-printed retro computer workstation, Normal/TATE mode cab builds, and a couple just to hook up to the CRTs I have lying around).

Comment by shoobiedoo 3 hours ago

Err I forget, it's the "real" one from Taiwan that was fairly expensive. Thank you for the tip though, I'd love to have one handy in the future.

Comment by wk_end 8 hours ago

Tomb Raider (1996) ostensibly required a Pentium, and I remember (though memory may be faulty) the demo refusing to run on my 486. Does this FPGA 486 support the additional Pentium instructions?

Comment by throwaway91033 2 hours ago

I think I played Tomb Raider on my 486. I also seem to remember I had an S3 ViRGE graphics card, so perhaps that helped

Comment by rasz 8 hours ago

Not require, just recommends Pentium 60 minimum. Like Quake Tomb Raider loves pipelined FPU, 30 fps on Pentium 60 vs 15 fps on 486DX2@66 and 20 on DX4@100.

Comment by tharkun__ 7 hours ago

Whoa, you took me back quite a few years there!

I really wanted a DX4@100 back then but it wasn't available in my area. I "had" to get a Pentium 60, which I was not happy about lol.

Upgraded to a Pentium 200 MMX. Whoa!

And then I also got a specific batch Celeron 300a to overclock.

"Stole" my dad's Matrox Mystique, coz what does he need a "3D" card for? Played "Destruction Derby" a lot, just coz 3D card: https://archive.org/details/dd2matrox_19961205

Wow, the times!

Comment by samuelec 59 minutes ago

If I remember correctly the Pentium 60 was the one that had math rounding errors, isn't it? What a memory

Comment by 0points 33 minutes ago

This?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

> The FDIV bug affects the 60 and 66 MHz Pentium P5 800 in stepping levels prior to D1, and the 75, 90, and 100 MHz Pentium P54C 600 in steppings prior to B5. The 120 MHz P54C and P54CQS CPUs are unaffected.

Comment by consp 3 hours ago

Iirc the only way of getting near 30fps on a socket 3 board is by bumping the bus to 50mhz, having fast cache and a 5x86 and enabling branch prediction and the fpu optimisations. And then wait for it to fault out. Never tried it with an Pentium overdrive though, maybe that will work but those do not like higher bus speeds. Might also be a nice difference in DX4s since the amd and cyrix parts have different fpu implementations to the intel ones.

Comment by Zardoz84 4 hours ago

I remember playing Star Fleet Academy demo on my 486DX5@133 and a Trident 3d SVGA card at slow motion in battles. The game requires a Pentium 75 or 90 and a DirectX accelerator.

Comment by tsunamifury 4 hours ago

Wait wait. You’re one of the rare people to ever this odd period of 486 history. What kind of overclocker did you use?

Comment by xupybd 7 hours ago

The lack of example videos is killing me!

Comment by Panzerschrek 4 hours ago

Am I right that Voodoo had no early depth test and thus triangles are textured even if they are completely obstructed?

Comment by djmips 4 hours ago

If you draw front to back that could handle some of that - it does have a Z buffer.

Comment by account42 16 minutes ago

Without an early Z test that would still do all the same calculations only to discard the fragment when it would be written to the frame buffer.

Comment by rasz 3 hours ago

The only PC desktop accelerator that could be considered early depth testing would be tile based 1996 PowerVR. ATI introduced HyperZ in 2000 Radeon DDR (R100), Nvidia followed in 2001 with GeForce 3 LMA. From what I remember Radeon compressed Z gains were surprisingly minimal, like 10-20% when turning it on/off, but Im sure it became crucial later on when real shaders (2.0) started being used.

Comment by jauntywundrkind 3 hours ago

Amusingly, open source devs are still hacking/improving HyperZ support in 2026. https://www.phoronix.com/news/ATI-R300-Occlusion-Query-Fix

The idea that we should ever allow companies to gate how we use hardware is a joke. The sustainability here is just wildly off the charts impressive. We as a species have blanket legal right to fix things we buy. Any legal monkeying that that from is us an affront to all of us, and if applicable whatever god or gods that made us.

Comment by mitxela 19 minutes ago

There's no good reason to get emotionally attached to obsolete hardware unless you are running a museum or just doing something cool. AMD doesn't hack on a Radeon R100 for the same reason everyone else doesn't: it's obsolete. It makes more sense to get a modern bargain-bin $30 fanless graphics card than to make your R100 work in any modern computer.

Comment by ggm 5 hours ago

I'd run the Virtual Notre Dame VRML demo in this, if I could!

Comment by throwitaway222 7 hours ago

I had that VooDoo card- Quake 1 was amazing on it. Of course today it's not amazing.

Comment by matwood 2 hours ago

I also had the original Voodoo card. It's rare to see a before and after divide in history so clearly. When I played Quake (and ran the time test) the first time on that Voodoo, I knew computer gaming had changed.

Comment by functionmouse 9 hours ago

Will it support 31kHz video out via VGA I wonder? Would love a period-accurate PC in my superstation one.

Comment by crtified 3 hours ago

The core is available at github and should run fine on your SS1, afaik. Be aware it's an experimental core.

https://github.com/nand2mario/z486_MiSTer

There is also a recent fork by github user janisc which is developing a direct 31khz output.

Speaking to general : To be clear, none of these MiSTer cores include the Voodoo graphics portion discussed in the parent link.

I doubt that the degree of sheer hyper-optimisation required to get a Voodoo (plus the Pentium to make it meaningful!) into a DE10-Nano necessarily exists. Never-say-never, sure, but also, just-no - hahaha.

That work is for higher specced boards like the Xilinx discussed.

Comment by hexapus 8 hours ago

I imagine it would...I haven't tried the core, but most of them maintain the original outputs over the VGA port. Even if, for some bizarre reason it didn't, you could just enable the vga_scaler and force it.

Comment by mysterydip 8 hours ago

I hadn’t thought of that possibility but it would indeed be fantastic!