Show HN: We Fixed UniFi's Slow PPPoE Performance with PPPoE Half-Bridge

Posted by uneven9434 4 hours ago

Counter33Comment12OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by sarabveer 1 hour ago

> Even in 2026, a huge number of ISPs still rely on PPPoE, including Bell Canada, AT&T Fiber, and Xfinity in the US, along with the vast majority of ISPs in Europe, Asia, and China.

Comcast (Xfinity) does not use PPPoE.

Comment by davidhariri 2 hours ago

In my specific situation I was able to use this WAS-110 to get full speed PPPoE from my fiber provider (Bell).

https://pon.wiki/guides/masquerade-as-the-bce-inc-giga-hub-2...

Comment by asniper 59 minutes ago

Sure, it bypasses the supplied hardware but does not solve PPPoE limitations on UniFi.

I use the same WAS-110 on Bell.

Comment by sage981 1 hour ago

The UCG Fiber numbers make the case: this is a SoC acceleration gap, not a PPPoE overhead problem. Half-bridge is a workaround for hardware Ubiquiti shipped.

Comment by nottorp 1 hour ago

Oh thanks. My local ISP insists on pppoe even for business lines.

I like the unifi APs but then using their gateways is a no-no.

Comment by q3k 3 hours ago

I miss when this kind of content would've just been two paragraphs and a config snippet.

(also, this isn't a "Show HN")

Comment by cr3ative 3 hours ago

I always suspected this was possible but having it demonstrated is excellent. I would assume this would be of most benefit on an OpenWRT box which _does_ support hardware offload!

Comment by simonjgreen 2 hours ago

I mean at this point just ditch the Unifi? You have a much more capable gateway in play now that needs to have equal to greater throughput than the one you are bridging for.

Comment by p_l 2 hours ago

No, the half-bridge is less capable for various functions, but happens to have hardware PPPoE offload which makes it faster for this specific function but not for others

Comment by mono442 3 hours ago

I guess what they did works but it makes some of valid ip addresses unavailable.

Comment by ksk23 2 hours ago

Was thinking along the same lines; why do we hardcode a /24? Is that reality in ISP last mile networks?!

Comment by hayleyest 9 minutes ago

AT&T offers only a /25 here. But it's just a shell script, adjust to whatever your flavor is. You can hardcode in your own netmask, bits, and gateway without any issue.

Comment by effnorwood 22 minutes ago

[dead]