Show HN: ssh ssh.place

Posted by jeninh 12 hours ago

Counter139Comment79OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by basdp 7 minutes ago

it's already littered with bots, so it's not fun for a human to go there.

Comment by 3dedb728-3f77 9 hours ago

Hey, is it not just a simple honeypot reverse hack ssh server?

People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?

Comment by arghwhat 3 hours ago

People understand that such "reverse hacking" can happen when their browser connects to any site (including all the indirect connections from dependent resources), right? Or when resolving any domain name? Or when even just pinging an IP?

The risk is far, far lower than browsing the internet. Unlike the massive surface of a browser and all the libraries and processes it is comprised of, the OpenSSH client is a tiny, with a singular purpose, contained in a small and very well-vetted codebase.

From the perspective of connecting to a foreign network service, the OpenSSH client is about the safest thing you can possibly use. Note the use of relative words here - not claiming it is 100% bug-free.

(The main caveat is that you can manually configure the client to do unsafe things, like writing a configuration by hand that enables X forwarding or agent forwarding by default for any host - but you can also actively disable sandboxing in your web browser or run everything as root, and we will never be able to stop you from actively making things insecure.)

Comment by jolmg 39 minutes ago

There's also the terminal to consider, via terminal escape sequences.

Comment by scubbo 8 hours ago

> People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?

No, actually, I've never heard of such a vector. How would that work?

Comment by mr_mitm 38 minutes ago

Here is a recent example. Currently unpatched in Debian stable.

https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-60002

As I understood this, a malicious server can change its host key somewhere during key exchange and trigger a use-after-free in the client, which might be exploitable for code execution.

Comment by jerrythegerbil 7 hours ago

An ssh server would exploit a vulnerability in the ssh client when it connects.

For example, openssh has both a client and server. There’s been vulnerabilities in openssh, in the client. Those vulnerabilities aren’t reachable unless you’re connecting to a server attempting to exploit you, so the risk is quite low because you know and trust most servers you’re connecting to with ssh.

To sum it up: Connecting to this server is probably fine, but in doing so most people are doing something significantly riskier without realizing it.

Comment by applfanboysbgon 6 hours ago

There has never been a real-world OpenSSH exploit that allows a server to RCE a client that connected to it without a bunch of dubious qualifiers. Connecting to a random SSH server is much, much less dangerous than running a random binary or executing a random curl install script, both of which people do all the time, and is probably about on par with the likelihood of a random website escaping your browser's sandbox and RCEing you.

Comment by soblemprolver 1 hour ago

I believe the recent cve-2026-55200 in libssh2 (client-side library) was allowing exactly this. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-55200 ("Remote attackers can send crafted SSH packets with excessively large packet_length values to corrupt heap memory and achieve remote code execution.")

Of course the other abouts that you whatted (such as random curl install scripts, binaries, etc.) are still more dangerous.

Comment by dinkelberg 2 hours ago

Web browsers are generally built with security in mind. Terminal emulators surely much less so. The OpenSSH client probably sits somewhat in between, generally developed with security in mind, but not necessarily consistently expecting malicious servers.

Comment by lxgr 4 hours ago

Agreed, bugs in the terminal emulator are probably more concerning. The attack surface of those is much larger (there are some pretty wild ANSI escape sequences, and terminal emulators are often granted pretty wide disk access permissions on systems that have them if they're also used for local development).

Comment by Oxodao 6 hours ago

If you properly set up your ssh client (No agent forwarding or X11 forwarding)

Comment by LoganDark 5 hours ago

Terminal, too; some escape sequences are able to perform attacks in old or buggy terminal emulators.

Comment by FooBarWidget 4 hours ago

Malicious servers can send malicious terminal escape codes. For example https://www.sentinelone.com/vulnerability-database/cve-2026-...

Comment by pydry 1 hour ago

theoretically a browser could have the same vulnerability and has a vastly higher attack surface.

has there ever been an example of such a vulnerability in openssh?

Comment by teiferer 7 hours ago

> To sum it up: Connecting to this server is probably fine

And what are you basing this statement on?

Comment by 4 hours ago

Comment by krautsauer 8 hours ago

Vulnerability in your ssh client (unlikely) or terminal emulator (more common but lower reach).

Comment by yjftsjthsd-h 5 hours ago

Terminal emulators have, on occasion, had all kinds of interesting escape codes that I wouldn't want to expose to an attacker. Whether this is even a true "vulnerability" is somewhat a matter of opinion (in the sense that the feature works as designed, but that's maybe a bad thing).

Comment by bulder 5 hours ago

Agent forwarding would be pretty big, if it for example pushed your git credentials to the remote host.

Comment by neuroticnews25 5 hours ago

Prove it, I'll connect to any server you point me to, using default openssh client flags.

Comment by bulbar 9 hours ago

Is that more likely than getting hacked when visiting a website?

Comment by xorcist 3 hours ago

Are we all pretending we have no empirical data on this? How many RCEs has there been in popular web browsers over the past two decades (dozens? hundreds?), compared to how many RCEs there has been in the OpenSSH client (perhaps we can make it one if we include xterm in that)?

Comment by jolmg 7 hours ago

Visiting a random website is the normal use of HTTP. With SSH, there might be assumptions of connecting to a trusted server you have an account with and likely own. It's not very normal to ssh to a random server.

Comment by teiferer 7 hours ago

> likely own

I don't know how you are using ssh, but most ssh servers that I have connected to in my life, and still do, I don't own. Some of them I barely trust.

Comment by QuantumNomad_ 6 hours ago

The ones I connect to the most often from my personal laptop I don’t physically own but I do pay to rent them and I installed the OS on them myself.

Comment by 52 minutes ago

Comment by hdgvhicv 3 hours ago

The main ones I don’t own are VPS servers from fairly large providers, or GitHub.

Comment by applfanboysbgon 9 hours ago

What exactly is the mechanism by which you think that an SSH RCE is "simple"?

Comment by dlgeek 9 hours ago

Not OP, but agent forwarding is a significant concern.

Comment by SXX 5 hours ago

Is it enabled by default though?

AFAIK: No

Comment by jamie0 4 hours ago

It's not, but there is likely a small number people who have something like this configured:

  Host *
  ForwardAgent yes

Comment by UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4 hours ago

Try me.

Comment by Tepix 2 hours ago

Why is there no orange? The entire colour palette is a bit depressing.

Also my terminal (Ubuntu in WSL2) had an ugly colour palette defined by default with several identical colours. I'm glad I found out!

Use this to check yours:

    for i in {0..15}; do
     printf "\e[48;5;%dm  %2d  \e[0m " "$i" "$i";     (( (i + 1) % 8 == 0 )) && echo;
    done
and then press ctrl + , to change it.

Comment by boomlinde 6 hours ago

If you have a slight interest in originality of presentation, whatever website copy first comes out of Claude is not there yet. Its preoccupation with "no x, no y" and annoying runs of sentence fragments might have been a punchy rhetoric for a short while before it became a tired cliché, but by now it stylistically makes it look more like you're bragging on LinkedIn than presenting something fun and creative.

I mention it because it's immediately off-putting even though the project itself sounds fun enough. It tarnishes it with the impression that maybe you just don't care, but maybe you just aren't attuned to the style and its strong slop connotations.

I'm genuinely fascinated by the problem and I've wondered what in the training process causes the model to develop this peculiar style of writing. Is it because it's trained on old Medium slop? Someone else replied with a link to their SSH-based VPS, where the copy is absolutely saturated with the same annoying style.

Comment by lxgr 4 hours ago

> I've wondered what in the training process causes the model to develop this peculiar style of writing

I think this might just be inherent to the currently deployed LLM architecture. If the training process works at all, any model will come out of it with some (default) voice that it'll apply everywhere.

Human voices are not like that, both because one copywriter does not write a significant fraction of all texts in the world and because unlike LLMs they remember all of their own prior writing, which gives them an opportunity to get tired of their old tropes.

Comment by myzek 4 hours ago

Yeah it kinda feels like a great, original meal but served on plasticware

Comment by lordgrenville 4 hours ago

I don't think Claude's writing style is peculiar, it is just that we are being flooded with it. Everything becomes stale with overuse.

Comment by boomlinde 4 hours ago

I think its peculiar in that it's so limited, repetitive and undiscerning in its stylistic expression.

The stylistic elements on their own wouldn't raise an eyebrow if they appeared rarely among many other stylistic devices in order to enhance drama, suspense or emphasis, but within a single completion, Claude will sometimes implement just these two several times to express the most banal things. It ends up looking like a caricature of the worst pre-LLM Medium and LinkedIn garbage.

Comment by thinkingemote 4 hours ago

> what in the training process causes

Read some early pre-mass-adoption LLM papers by the key scientists and researchers. The style is very similar...

Comment by cbarrick 10 hours ago

Are we coordinating factions here, like the original r/place? The social aspect was such a big part of the original. I'll start:

# PURPLE FRAME #

Our mission is to draw a purple frame around the canvas. 2 rows of blank space between the frame and the top/bottom of the canvas. 4 cols of blank space between the frame and the left/right of the canvas.

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

I'm wondering if there is a better way to do this. On one hand, we could just do it here but then I can't link people to this page or it'll harm the post. I could also just use a subreddit or make a forum on https://ssh.place

Comment by teiferer 6 hours ago

Building in support for that into the site itself kinda goes against the spirit.

It's understandable that you as the maker want to flame the hype as much as possible, but by making it too obvious you are kinda working against that goal.

Comment by cbarrick 10 hours ago

The organicness of the original was really fun. Dunno if coordinating here really fits the HN vibe, but also go where the people are.

Comment by jetbalsa 3 hours ago

Place 2 wasn't too bad, it did get botted to all hell. I handled some the early recordings of the canvas to make live time lapses of it. I've done the same here just to have something to mess about with.

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

I'm just wondering what to do when this post dies down. Then I guess I could link to it... It's not like it's going to go back to the front page anyways

Comment by christian_well 2 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by cbarrick 11 hours ago

I can't see my cursor if it is placed on top of a cell that has already been colored.

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

Oops. I'll fix that right now

Comment by Heliodex 8 hours ago

Nice, I first saw this on Hack Club ;) Check your terminal to see if it supports certain colours, on mine the darker and lighter colours (eg. maroon/red, purple/magenta) look identical.

Comment by bestony 10 hours ago

So cool! If I wanted to make a similar product, how should I do it? Do you have any advice or research directions? I saw a company using SSH for hiring a couple of days ago, and I thought it was really cool. I also want to build something similar.

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

I'm going to be so honest, I don't have much advice for you. I'm a teenager who's part of Hack Club (https://hackclub.com) who made this entirely for fun.

I was inspired by @zachlatta's SSHtron (https://github.com/zachlatta/sshtron) and wanted to make an SSH game. I loved how easy it was for him to promote it too, he made a HN post with title "ssh sshtron.zachlatta.com" because it gets people to try out the actual game rather than look at a README. If you have a business, find something useful that would help! Or in my case, find something fun you want to make/remake to be used in the terminal over SSH. Hack Club also used to have a hiring page over SSH, if I recall correctly.

My code uses wish, bubbletea and lipgloss from Charm. You can look at the code over at https://github.com/jeninh/ssh.place

Good luck!

Comment by Retr0id 11 hours ago

> Your cooldown is tied to your SSH key

This sounds like a recipe for bots that bypass the cooldown...

Comment by jeninh 11 hours ago

I also have limits for IP and device + some other factors :) The full details are in the README on GitHub. But also I don't expect too many people to find this, it's one of my first public projects. If we do get a surge of people then I'll implement something better.

Comment by koolala 8 hours ago

Wish we had a WebSSH like WebSockets / IRC v3.

Comment by messh 11 hours ago

I love ssh apps! See also late.sh, and my own https://shellbox.dev

Comment by somat 9 hours ago

Mine is hard to get to(ip6 only) but was started around the idea of a shared postgres database.

ssh applicant@register.public.outband.net

The web page https://www.public.outband.net hosted on the same box, if you can see it you have the needed ip6.

No users yet but feel free to try it out.

Comment by miyuru 4 hours ago

your dns server is down.

;; communications error to 2001:470:4b:27e:8::#53: timed out

Comment by somat 1 hour ago

Salutes, I had just redone the firewall and forgot to check external access, Works for me herp derp. I guess everything is fine. sigh Should be up now.

Comment by Hugsbox 3 hours ago

Ayy late.sh called out, my favourite hangout on the internet :) I'm in there every evening antagonizing the bartender

Comment by nickzelei 10 hours ago

Shellbox looks really cool! I love the proliferation of ssh apps lately… Ever since I saw the terminal coffee I’ve been inspired. I’ve been working on https://billard.sh myself for a bit.

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

Shellbox is so sick!!! I'm going to look into implementing it into a project I'm working on.

Comment by BetterThanSober 9 hours ago

Parked means the storage is kept, right?

Comment by messh 8 hours ago

Yes, storage and memory/processes. It is basically suspended, not running

Comment by qudat 8 hours ago

another one: https://pico.sh

Comment by fragmede 11 hours ago

and funky.nondeterministic.computer

Comment by quietsegfault 11 hours ago

Make sure to not be forwarding ssh agents! :)

Comment by erikschoster 11 hours ago

This is fun, I tried to draw a flower but it sucks.

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

It's a pretty flower :-) I hope it wasn't you who put that red line through it

Comment by erikschoster 10 hours ago

lol no someone else did that while i was drawing it. thanks :)

Comment by jeninh 10 hours ago

Aww...

Comment by dhotson 4 hours ago

Hah nice! I made something a bit like this too:

    ssh paint.dn.ht
It's using kitty/iTerm2/Ghostty image placement + pixel mouse reporting support for drawing.

..and for more fun:

    ssh ski.dn.ht
:-)

Comment by mplewis 9 hours ago

Takes all the fun out of it when people are multiboxing for the sake of posting an advertisement. Oh well.

Comment by buffer_overlord 10 hours ago

ssh join@bbs.profullstack.com

Comment by raggi 9 hours ago

Time for your regular reminder that ssh has no PKI and is trivial to mitm during tofu.

Comment by sph 4 hours ago

Acronyms are supposed to be capitalised. I do not belive you are talking about the soy product.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-in-the-middle_attack

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_on_first_use

Comment by kro 8 hours ago

I understand that most people don't use it and indeed rely on tofu, but the statement is not absolutely correct.

ssh server keys can be authenticated using (the DNSSEC "CA" system and) SSHFP, and it's possible to setup a signing CA for the host key (similar to ssh certificates, however not applicable for foreign servers). And of course, the fingerprint could be advertised out of band e.g. on the homepage with tls

Comment by raggi 6 hours ago

sshfp is not PKI. It's an option and it is off by default in ssh(1). In practice no one actually deploys it, exe.dev, terminal.shop, jobs.{whoever.com}, etc. I've yet to see an in the wild deployment. The aforementioned sites let you perform electronic payment transactions over ssh without it, which is probably a PCI violation tbh, but auditors aren't good enough.

webpki is on by default.

Comment by pzacik 8 hours ago

Yes, but what exactly would an attacker achieve by doing mitm here?

Comment by raggi 6 hours ago

here, less than most, but look for ssh agents

on terminal.shop, steal credit cards on jobs endpoints, perform identity theft on exe.dev, whatever you put on there

Comment by rvz 5 hours ago

Agreed. Amid all this hype, once again we continue to see such disregard for basic security implications and using ssh outside it's intended use-case; especially sshing into random servers.

Now we wait for the discovery of an RCE, key leakage vulnerability or a security bypass that leads to a trivial mitm attack to magnify why ssh apps make no sense security wise.

Comment by cdelsolar 9 hours ago

aw it didn't work with kitty. i get logged out.