When transit passes were designed by hand (2022)
Posted by nate 3 days ago
Comments
Comment by rsynnott 21 hours ago
… so, really? In the 20th century? I’m _almost_ certain that the Dublin and Kingstown Railway (1834) did season tickets; remember seeing one once. Even if not that, surely some one did in the century between the invention of commuter rail and the Milwaukee one?
(The Dublin and Kingstown railway, allegedly the first commuter railway in the world, is interesting in that it was clearly designed before people had figured out what commuter rail was _for_; on launch it was every half hour on weekdays… and every 15 mins on Sunday. These days it’s every ten mins on weekdays and every 20 mins on Sunday… But in the very early days there was definitely an impression that using commuter rail was a leisure activity.
It was also extended with the world’s first atmospheric railway, which lasted about ten years before being replaced with something more sensible. Today, Dublin has about four commuter lines, which just goes to show that first mover advantage doesn’t count for much.)
Comment by scoot 16 hours ago
Season and weekly are different things (obviously). If you narrow your claim down enough, of course you can be the first (patents or Guinness book of world records being prome examples.)
But the article isn't about that, it's about the design of the tickets. And they are a thing of beauty.
Comment by pasc1878 7 hours ago
What is this separation of weekly?
Comment by sharms 22 hours ago
Comment by mrweasel 19 hours ago
If you have children, let them pick colours, they aren't yet scared of bold choices and don't needs to explain why your hen house if some weird shade of pink or why that one rooms is a random shade of mint green. They just liked the colour and thought it would be awesome.
Comment by masfuerte 20 hours ago
Comment by rob74 16 hours ago
Comment by smallerize 14 hours ago
Comment by Schiendelman 21 hours ago
This kind of thing is illegible (not to mention inaccessible) for visitors. Someone comes to your city and they want to ride a train instead of driving their rental car into your downtown. Your transit requires a card. They're not comfortable with your language, they have to find a machine, and the first one doesn't work right.
They finally get a machine that works, after standing in line behind several other people. It turns out they need to buy a new special card and then load it with one of a number of confusing products.
They get your pretty card. Then they have to pay attention to where that card is at all times, and buy exactly the right number of tokens to load onto it (potentially). They can only buy tokens in a few select locations in your city, realize they have run out, and end up Ubering for the rest of their trip. Or they have to buy the timed card that expires in four days, halfway through their trip, and remember to get the next one in two days because it's not on sale yet.
We have wallets built into our phones now. Transit is a utility - it should universally take tap to pay, and more major cities are now rolling that out. Zero planning, zero extra "new and unique" objects to keep track of.
If you want a date based pass for a long visit instead of paying per trip, both Apple and Google have a way for you to buy transit passes directly from their wallet. You can always make that virtual card pretty.
Comment by pibaker 20 hours ago
Tap to pay may work if you actually use your phone as your wallet. From what I see around me, most people don't. And on this website in particular you have surely seen people advocating for cash over privacy concerns. Nor would I be confident that my card will work flawlessly in another city half a planet away before I get there. I will buy a weekly pass from a machine, though, especially if it looks cute enough that I can bring it home as souvenir.
Comment by refactor_master 17 hours ago
Comment by mschuster91 5 hours ago
They are not wrong, just look at Germany before the Deutschlandticket, but that one is useless for tourists so they still are stuck in the Holy Roman Empire of Public Transport Systems [1].
[1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Karte_de...
Comment by anigbrowl 16 hours ago
> Insist that everything work indistinguishably from how it works at home
Not gonna make it
Comment by kccqzy 21 hours ago
Comment by HumblyTossed 21 hours ago
Comment by clickety_clack 21 hours ago
Comment by bluGill 21 hours ago
Comment by rob74 16 hours ago
Comment by bluGill 3 hours ago
I want to get places and the money spent on beautiful means despite being a rich country the us cannot afford great transit.
Comment by Schiendelman 20 hours ago
Comment by rob74 16 hours ago
Comment by reaperducer 16 hours ago
Sure you can.
At least in the United States, there are many state and local laws requiring a certain percentage of the money spent on building projects be dedicated to making them look good, and to putting art inside them.
One example of many: https://sfca.hawaii.gov/art-in-public-places-program/percent...
Usually it's public projects, but often it's both public and private construction.
Comment by jmward01 22 hours ago
Carrying cash/something physical in general to pay for transit has basically gone away. I suspect this has helped ridership but there are a few losses too.
Comment by CalRobert 21 hours ago
On the other hand, a few years ago I was in Paris and when the metro spit my ticket back at me it blew away in the wind. I suppose there were some downsides…
Comment by pepperoni_pizza 21 hours ago
Comment by dfxm12 21 hours ago
Transit passes may have been phased out in a lot of places, but there are lots of opportunities for a city to design and display public art.
Comment by gblargg 7 hours ago
Comment by someperson 20 hours ago
Comment by yard2010 19 hours ago
Comment by Gigachad 15 hours ago
Comment by ggm 11 hours ago
Comment by mc32 22 hours ago
Comment by keeganpoppen 17 hours ago