Atomarine: Nuclear Data Centers at Sea
Posted by ndr 4 days ago
Comments
Comment by class3shock 3 days ago
1. 4-5x faster deployment than on land
- Not that this will ever be built but if it were, I assume Newport News or Electric Boat would be fitting the nuclear reactor (unless they cheap out and go with an import). Given they are booked solid until the 2040s somehow this company is even slower than the nuclear industry at building land based plants.
2. 1.5 GW deployed per year
- Starting in which year?
3. 1.1 PUE seawater cooling, modeled.
- Well there you have it, they modeled it, so it's basically already built.
4. 20-40 year infrastructure life
- Remind me how many 20 year old servers are currently running AI workloads? Oh, I guess that just means the ships and the nuclear reactor. I mean I guess that's good, it's not like a building on land would last that long...
Oh but I guess they will just be using LNG to start with, thank goodness that is alot easier to get than nuclear. In fact now is a really good time to start this as I heard there's some companies looking to offload a few LNG tankers somewhere in the gulf for a steal!
Comment by voakbasda 3 days ago
Comment by class3shock 2 days ago
Comment by tatersolid 4 days ago
Have these guys factored in the cost of a task force of protective missile frigates, subs, and destroyers at each site?
Comment by _n_b_ 4 days ago
I wouldn’t touch civil maritime nuclear with a barge pole, and if I did, the clear win is decarbonizing big cargo ships.
Comment by trencedamp 4 days ago
But the people championing nuclear data centers are not trying to solve climate change
Comment by fuoqi 4 days ago
Comment by glitchcrab 3 days ago
Correct. That's where the GPs comment regarding stealth comes into play.
Comment by fc417fc802 3 days ago
Comment by citrin_ru 4 days ago
Comment by joshuanapoli 4 days ago
Comment by Fluorescence 4 days ago
I imagine land is a lower bar to entry, accessible to a much larger criminal base, but security response times and road surveillance is tough.
I'm too much of a land-lubber to know how easy it is vanish from a coastal crime scene by ship. The sea... nowhere to hide but very big. Can satellites track you these days? If wanting to nab a container or two that's a big ship. Not much you could put in a minisub or sub-surface thing. A James Bond villain could cut the supports and drag the whole thing to the hollowed out mountain of their island lair.
I need Michael Mann to make "Heat but on a boat" to educate me.
Comment by AtlasBarfed 3 days ago
Like.... LFTR
Basically, the normal operation of the reactor doesn't allow the production of weapons-useful nuclear isotopes.
You'll probably also need a smaller footprint reactor
Like.... LFTR
And you'll want something that can be turned on, shut off, and has natural anti-meltdown abilities in case hurricanes or other disasters threaten the ractor
Like ... LFTR
Comment by preisschild 4 days ago
Comment by kingleopold 4 days ago
Comment by zombot 4 days ago
Comment by fulafel 4 days ago
Comment by Hamuko 4 days ago
Comment by throwawayffffas 4 days ago
Comment by highvoltageguy 4 days ago
Comment by JodieBenitez 4 days ago
Comment by UnfitFootprint 4 days ago
I’d be stunned if anyone takes this seriously
Comment by forgottentea 4 days ago
Comment by voakbasda 3 days ago
Comment by alansaber 4 days ago
Comment by sschueller 4 days ago
Comment by LargoLasskhyfv 6 hours ago
Comment by noosphr 4 days ago
The fact you're surrounded by coolant, can use intrinsically safe versions of high pressure reactors and have low latency between multiple markets with one datacenter is a big plus.
That you're not competing with humans for electricity or water is another.
That said you'd want to build a semi submersible platform with the nuclear reactors in the pontoons and the superstructure able to house container based datacenter units. The only place with enough experience to build these is South Korea which isn't a deal breaker per se, but Samsung can pretty much eat your lunch if these get successful.
Comment by mjhay 4 days ago
Comment by noosphr 4 days ago
Comment by citadel_melon 4 days ago
Trust but verify
Comment by noosphr 3 days ago
Comment by formvoltron 4 days ago
Comment by cryo32 4 days ago
Bring on the exploding drone boats.
Comment by Imustaskforhelp 4 days ago
Also regulation and tax by being offshore have much easier ways to be bypassed and which are already being done effectively so by utilizing already existing legal structures and jurisdictions I think.
Comment by heyjstn 4 days ago
Comment by iancutzul 4 days ago
Comment by beloch 4 days ago
https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/pangeos-terayacht-turtle/
TL;DR: Pangeos was a concept for a floating free city that trended a few years back, but was never built for obvious reasons, just like how these floating data centres will never be built. Presumably some people were bilked into paying money to the Pangeos scammers, just like there will be those who "invest" in this.
The problem is that it costs a lot more to put a nuclear reactor into a permanently sea-worthy form-factor than it does to build on land and put up with some pesky taxes. There are plenty of places with lax regulations (environmental and otherwise) that will be happy to let you build whatever size data centre you want if you're willing to build the power generation too.
Comment by Faaak 4 days ago
The sensible way would be to use the waste heat for district heating, but let's heat the fish instead
Comment by pbmonster 4 days ago
Comment by goodpoint 4 days ago
Comment by fc417fc802 3 days ago
Comment by Theodores 4 days ago
What happened to that?
Given the expense of the latest AI chips, or just the RAM for them, the price of land, cooling and power is not top of the expenses bill, so all talk of sea-based or space-based data centres has to be regarded as having jumped the shark.
As of yet I have not seen the use of server racks as structural architectural features. They always seem to need a vast shed that has its own supports, when server racks could also be the walls and supports for much of the building, or some other structure, maybe a road bridge.
Comment by 2PqboPPmKegvanx 4 days ago
Project Natnick!
It was a success, the research concluded and it is no longer active.
Article: https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/sustainability/pr...
Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Natick
In June, China opened a $236 M wind powered underwater data center. Article references another commercial underwater data center they opened in 2023.
https://www.wired.com/story/china-opens-worlds-first-wind-po...
Comment by throwoutway 3 days ago
Comment by Imustaskforhelp 4 days ago
That being said, the shipping container idea is decent but the bottleneck is still power not so much cooling, so unless someone figures out a way to have an actual nuclear power reactor, there are issues.
Also oh the issue isn't that there aren't nuclear power reactors but that they aren't large enough. Some nuclear powered datacenters exist in some experimental settngs but these new Datacenters are trying to take a magnitude more and they can't wait for the production of those things and further research.
Comment by emifo3 4 days ago
Comment by vincnetas 4 days ago
Comment by Imustaskforhelp 4 days ago
Comment by AnthonyMouse 4 days ago
The obvious answer is NIMBYs.
Comment by getmoheb 4 days ago
Comment by danofsteel32 3 days ago
Since most people live near a coast this could power more than just data centers.
Comment by tavavex 3 days ago
Data centers! Everyone wants more data centers! But how do I get in on the craze? I think the brightest investors of our generation are hungry for data centers placed in weird places. Space data centers, underwater data centers, data centers in the Earth's core and on a space elevator! I got it - sea data centers! Now, to make this idea not sound crazy, we'll just pretend there's literally not a single shred of buildable land on the entire planet. So now we've established that land data centers suck, all we need to do is to figure out the easy parts, such as shipbuilding, propulsion, creating our own power grid (no worries, we'll just pretend that designing, building, maintaining and scaling a state of the art nuclear reactor at sea is easier than building a power line on land or even just constructing a normal land power plant), repairs, staffing, scaling construction (got to make building ships cheaper than a warehouse) and about a billion other things. I think we'll just try to think of the smallest numbers we can, no one will check. Oh, and since that nuclear thing is so hard, we'll actually just get tons of fossil fuels instead and pollute away in international waters, we promise we'll switch to that miracle nuclear mega reactor we're building! Now all that's left is to AI generate us some text, AI generate some images, AI generate us a website and that's it! YC26 baby!
Did I get that right? This is like investing into a perpetual motion machine on Kickstarter level crazy. Am I still living on the same planet?
Comment by subpixel 3 days ago
Comment by fc417fc802 3 days ago
Note that there are already some pilot ocean based datacenter projects. The most recent one I'm aware of is attached to nearshore wind. I have to imagine that makes far more sense than floating a civilian nuclear reactor on the high seas.
Comment by gmuslera 4 days ago
Comment by fluxflexer 4 days ago
Comment by antonvs 4 days ago
Comment by davidricodias 4 days ago
Comment by sdoering 4 days ago
Comment by imglorp 4 days ago
Comment by simoncrosby1 3 days ago
Comment by avens19 4 days ago
Comment by V__ 4 days ago
Comment by lgl 4 days ago
Guys, guys, guys... so hear me out - remember last month when we were all giddy about datacenters in space? Well, apparently investors weren't too keen on that idea so we've come up with something much better: Nuclear datacenters at sea!
Now this is truly a visionary proposition that will certainly become another unicorn and have no issues whatsoever.
Comment by st_goliath 4 days ago
Innovative new air cooling: instead of using lots of tiny fans to move air through the servers, we simply use 2 big fans to move the servers through the air!
And while we're at it, we'll completely disrupt the existing Zeppelin market that depends on expensive helium for some reason. We use daring, innovative hydrogen technology, enabling a massive cost reduction!
Comment by 2PqboPPmKegvanx 4 days ago
love this idea, where do i mail my money to invest!!!!!
Comment by lgl 3 days ago
Comment by throwawayffffas 4 days ago
Comment by Imustaskforhelp 4 days ago
As many countries are now trying to suggest, bring your own power and we are happy.
So in that sense, Nuclear? sure, already being tried but not fast or big enough right now.
Sea? I don't think so. You literally get into murky waters on the future of the project and this part feels really hype based, atleast to me.
Perhaps some people feel that Sea could cool things off but in my understanding, if you already have nuclear, it would be better building Datacenters in colder stranded regions then to have really effective temperature/natural cooling.
Power is the core issue, Everything else is bolted on top of it in my opinion.
Comment by trencedamp 4 days ago
Comment by sgt 4 days ago
Comment by popPopBoom 3 days ago
Comment by rtmkrptn 4 days ago