A.I. companies are recruiting electricians and carpenters by the thousands
Posted by thm 5 days ago
Comments
Comment by eddyg 5 days ago
Comment by xur17 5 days ago
Comment by kvisner 5 days ago
Comment by axus 5 days ago
IBEW (Union electricians) have been doing really well this decade. Another option if you don't want to be a contractor or an Anthropic employee. But they've also gone years without enough work to go around.
Scroll down to this comment for a better discussion than I could give: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098874
Comment by nerdbaggy 4 days ago
Comment by axus 4 days ago
Comment by 4d4m 4 days ago
Comment by pfdietz 4 days ago
Comment by throwup238 4 days ago
That doesn’t mean your specific local market won’t be cyclical though. As usual the electricians in higher densities metros will probably do better with aggregate demand.
Comment by limecherrysoda 4 days ago
While DC is driving electrons down the line, AC is basically just when you vibrate them around.
Anyway my point is the field (no pun intended) may change drastically in the increasingly electrified future. I'm personally excited for more wireless power in areas, and the concept of ambient energy - harvesting power out of the already vibrating electrons in the static in the air.
Comment by mjevans 4 days ago
Think of DC more like you're trying to pump a frozen ice mixture drink (trying to avoid any of the major brand names) down a straw. If you melt it, that's loss to heat. If the pressure gets there that's DC current.
The AC vibrations are the same thing except it's like the lever action on a steam locomotive. Translating the motor's spin into a back and forth wave in the line.
This is why AC is rather useful for making other things spin or vibrate to the point of being emissive.
Comment by leonidasrup 4 days ago
"How Electricity Actually Works"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI_X2cMHNe0
"The Biggest Misconception About Electricity"
Comment by perpetuallunch 4 days ago
https://youtube.com/@electroboom?si=HqjCoJtrn6ci41uw
Others that deserve a mention:
styropyro
https://youtube.com/@styropyro?si=aPBPXdj42Oo0UzC2
The Angry Pixie herder, Uncle Bumblefuck aka AvE:
https://youtube.com/@arduinoversusevil2025?si=f1LHLwVdQTn0O8...
And that guy with the multi gigawatt 150,000 volt Lorentz Cannon:
https://youtu.be/lix-vr_AF38?si=P_WLCJFAUOD01pEF
I’m sure I forgot someone?
AlphaPhoenix’s response to Veritasium:
Comment by doubleg72 3 days ago
Comment by perpetuallunch 3 days ago
Comment by vitally3643 4 days ago
Sure, they're real phenomena that actually do exist, but the physics are such that they're almost entirely useless beyond extremely specific and very limited applications.
These things have been known and studied for decades now, and the best use we have is charging your phone when you set it down on a special pad. Energy harvesting applications are good for sending a single radio packet once a week. It's just fundamental limitations of the universe.
Anyone excited about wireless power or energy harvesting hasn't read any further than "wireless power and energy harvesting". They aren't what you think they are.
Comment by paxys 4 days ago
I’d go as far as to say that for someone in their teens electrician (or trades in general) is a more stable long term career path than software engineer.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by esikich 4 days ago
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by 8note 4 days ago
Comment by Jolter 4 days ago
Comment by throwitaway222 4 days ago
Comment by oblio 4 days ago
Useful to keep in mind when choosing a new career.
Comment by throwitaway222 4 days ago
Comment by oblio 3 days ago
Comment by someothherguyy 4 days ago
sure they will, all it takes is automating running wire and making connections. when the cost is low enough to do so, it will happen.
drones are already used to somewhat automate line inspection, etc.
imo, there are plenty of companies attempting to automate traditional trade jobs, and increasing automation for knowledge roles in those companies will accelerate those initiatives.
Comment by jaredhallen 4 days ago
Comment by someothherguyy 4 days ago
not commercially, but i worked as a residential electrician and contractor for half a decade, if we are doing ad hominems
Comment by Mawr 4 days ago
Can't imagine where I'd even start with automating the work of an electrician. Even something as basic as robots grabbing regular objects is intractable right now, much less handling wire.
You'd have to have a project of massive scale that's designed specifically to aid automation and then have a fairly straightforward robot doing the work.
"Send a robot to arbitrary location X and do arbitrary electrician job Z" is fantasy land.
Comment by archonis 4 days ago
If datacenter demand doesn't evaporate, mega scale datacenters sound like the most probable candidates for this.
Comment by trhway 4 days ago
In such a module-based construction you can optimize layout and the fabrication sequence so that the labor is minimized and simplified - like for example you'd be simply laying down wire instead of running it.
Thus the modules can be fabricated where the labor is cheap and plentiful and with high degree of robots usage while only final assembly would require high cost labor at the target location.
Comment by seanmcdirmid 4 days ago
Comment by trhway 4 days ago
Anyway, that demonstrates another way of datacenters getting modularized. The point is that the actual volume of datacenters to be produced calls for the mass production assembly line style. The one-off custom built approach becomes unsustainable.
Comment by someothherguyy 4 days ago
installation systems are currently made for humans, so one has to do some fantasizing to see a future where installs can be done completely by non-human agents or by automated orchestration of low skill human agents.
Comment by nik282000 4 days ago
The only way to really automate electrical installation is at the source (ha), when the construction materials are manufactured. I can imagine some god awful system of snap-together conduit prefilled with conductor, and junction boxes with monster dip switches to replace manual connections. It will cost 10x the price of standard materials, and it will be horribly wastful, but the labour costs will be negligible if it can be done by a robot or unskilled labourer.
Comment by democracy 4 days ago
Comment by chasd00 5 days ago
Comment by mike_bob 4 days ago
This cry of "OMG dues suck" is so stupid for what you get in return. But go ahead and buy more into republican propaganda.
Comment by ransom1538 4 days ago
Comment by gosub100 4 days ago
Comment by SirHackalot 4 days ago
Comment by nekusar 4 days ago
"For the Epsteinth time, class unity is only for the upper classes"
Comment by webstrand 4 days ago
Comment by asats 4 days ago
Comment by SirHackalot 4 days ago
I haven’t been on Reddit in ages, if that helps :)
Comment by stasomatic 4 days ago
Comment by therein 4 days ago
Comment by Cthulhu_ 4 days ago
Comment by ceroxylon 4 days ago
Comment by bespokedevelopr 4 days ago
Comment by tedmiston 4 days ago
Comment by axus 4 days ago
Comment by bespokedevelopr 4 days ago
Comment by 8note 4 days ago
Comment by nekooooo 4 days ago
Comment by astura 4 days ago
Comment by bandrami 4 days ago
Comment by cucumber3732842 4 days ago
Comment by icehawk 4 days ago
I can see exactly where the practical experience would be invaluable.
Comment by AnthonyMouse 4 days ago
The way an apprenticeship works is that the apprentice does the work, then the contractor signs off on it, then the government inspector signs off on it.
This obviously makes no sense, right? If the apprentice does work that won't pass inspection then it won't pass inspection regardless of whether an existing contractor looks at it first, so no one is being protected from anything by that. If they do work that will pass inspection then what non-protectionist purpose is there in forcing them to have a competing existing contractor sign off on it before they can have it inspected for real?
In theory the competing contractor could be supervising the apprentice while they're doing the work instead of giving them some work to do and then leaving them to it while they do some other work themselves or take a long lunch, but there is nothing to enforce that happening and therefore the expectation that it reliably does is a fictional academic reality inconsistent with real incentives.
Comment by Moto7451 4 days ago
Comment by cucumber3732842 4 days ago
Who do you think has more practical experience that will be relevant to spotting an error in a plan for some circuits that will bring power to some chillers?
Some guy who's spent 5yr installing outlets and light fixtures in luxury 5-over-1 apartment buildings for FANNG-twats and has the license to go with or some guy who's spent 5yr doing the machinery wiring and controls (i.e. "after the outlet" stuff you don't need a license for) in an cardboard manufacturing facility?
I'm not saying these people should be unlicensed. Frankly I don't care. If they're gonna be licensed though then the license should be accessible to those with the relevant skill and knowledge and not be a protectionist gate keeping exercise at the expense of everyone in society that needs access to this kind of labor.
The comments in here speak volumes. Talk about being blinded by ideology.
Comment by inigyou 4 days ago
Comment by akersten 4 days ago
Comment by bdangubic 4 days ago
Comment by cucumber3732842 4 days ago
Comment by xtajv 4 days ago
I'm also tempted to point out that anybody can give high-voltage work a whirl.... once.
---
But what do I know, I'm not a sparky, I'm one of them snot-nosed software engineering types. Y'know, the one engineering field that's too free and clever to get licensed, bonded, insured, or unionized. /s
Who needs regulation, anyways? I bet Matthew Broderick's Wargames was pure science fiction, and Upton Sinclair's The Jungle was just an exaggeration. Let's go burn some OSHA manuals and start up an Ayn Rand bookclub! /s
Comment by cucumber3732842 4 days ago
The guy who's day job includes dealing with "after the outlet" electrical stuff in an industrial setting is gonna be just as if not more qualified to hop on over into a data center or other industrial setting and to the actual "affixed to the building" wiring than some guy who's been doing residential houses and apartments for most of his career but holds the magic piece of paper that the ignorant think is more valuable than it is. He should be allowed to pay money, take whatever education to fill in gaps and take the tests and get the license without wasting years.
Comment by pianopatrick 4 days ago
Comment by barbazoo 5 days ago
Comment by HeyLaughingBoy 5 days ago
Comment by badc0ffee 4 days ago
Comment by csdreamer7 4 days ago
To add to this there are jurisdictions that will require you to still pay a small monthly fee to support the gas pipes if you cut off gas service.
It is really nice not having a gas bill and not requiring maintenance for gas appliances, but most people won't care if they lived with it for long enough.
The only case I see it working is in a disaster area or blighted areas where the builder decided to bulldoze and rebuild the houses. The southern California fires for example; the city gave priority to permits to houses that went all electric since the gas pipes were destroyed. Permitting and inspection is so much simpler with all electric.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by wffurr 5 days ago
Comment by mjevans 4 days ago
Yes, people should make efforts to not waste electricity (use more effective lights, etc). However the demand is _never_ going to go down. Progress utilizes more energy. Make stuff more efficient, or less expensive, and people will do more things, or more people will do things. That's how quality of live goes up.
Comment by oblio 4 days ago
Comment by AnthonyMouse 4 days ago
Comment by barbazoo 4 days ago
I'm thinking learning something in that field might be an option.
Comment by Gigachad 4 days ago
Comment by throw0101d 4 days ago
HVAC and electrical (e.g. UPSes) need somewhat regular maintenance, so once build-out is done, if you're with one of the OEMs, you'll probably have regular work babysitting the gear.
Comment by andsoitis 4 days ago
That averages to 150k per annum, which is more than double the median salary in the US.
Comment by NichoPaolucci 5 days ago
Comment by boelboel 4 days ago
Comment by newtonianrules 4 days ago
Comment by solenoid0937 4 days ago
IMO taxes should be on the rolling average of your income so two good years does not mean you get taxed as if that's your steady state
Comment by seanmcdirmid 4 days ago
Comment by bell-cot 4 days ago
But if not...
Comment by foobarian 4 days ago
Comment by qup 4 days ago
Comment by obmelvin 4 days ago
Comment by AnthonyMouse 4 days ago
Comment by Analemma_ 4 days ago
Comment by jillesvangurp 4 days ago
This is being driven by the plummeting cost of electricity. Mostly our inefficient and obsolete grids somewhat hide this trend. But those that have been experimenting with off grid installations or are playing early adopters by putting a lot of solar panels and batteries in/on their houses are starting to figure out that once you have these in place, the marginal cost of power is basically zero. The hardware isn't that expensive. The process of getting it installed currently is. Mainly because of the scarcity of skilled labor and the amount of bureaucratic overhead needed for permitting, certification, and the cost of the people doing that work.
But the big picture here is enormous amounts of industrial processes, domestic heating, charging infrastructure, grid infrastructure, etc. related hardware will need installing over the next decades. And most of that will involve electricians. Data centers might be a bit of a bubble. But I don't think that will go away completely and there's going to be no shortage of other stuff that also needs to be installing.
Comment by smrtinsert 4 days ago
Comment by AnthonyMouse 4 days ago
Comment by vivekd 4 days ago
Comment by dismalaf 4 days ago
Comment by rayiner 4 days ago
Comment by thedreammachine 4 days ago
Comment by bawolff 4 days ago
Comment by AnthonyMouse 4 days ago
Comment by brcmthrowaway 4 days ago
Comment by notyourwork 4 days ago
Comment by kelvinjps10 4 days ago
Comment by obligor_io 4 days ago
Comment by throwitaway222 4 days ago
Comment by kristov 5 days ago
Comment by willis936 5 days ago
Comment by DEF14A 4 days ago
"Projects I work on..."
Comment by estearum 4 days ago
Comment by Permit 4 days ago
More directly: I doubt there will be a meaningful increase in housing in states that have banned construction of new data centers (NY, Maine) than those where data centers are allowed to be built.
Comment by estearum 4 days ago
Lack of skilled tradesmen is a widespread problem and a major source of project delay (on top of massively higher housing production costs).
I assume next comes the zoning-causes-all-shortages and if only we could fix zoning then we'd solve housing – a thesis for which there's zero evidence.
Comment by AngryData 4 days ago
If the AI boom crashes, how many of these people will get laid off and unable to find comparable paying work for years afterward? Even if it picks up again 5 years later, many of those people have moved on to new careers. And the only way to get them back, even temporarily, is pay them way more than their current career to pay for their losses and hardships of quiting their current career path. So ultimately boils down to "pay people more" because you aren't just incentivizing people to work for you specifically during a boom cycle, you are also trying to poach workers out of other industries for a job they know is temporary.
Comment by estearum 4 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 4 days ago
Comment by Marsymars 4 days ago
This is baffling to me from the homeowner's perspective.
I just checked the last invoice I had for electrical work - $300 for something that took <30 minutes and <$20 of supplies.
(And like, he did good work and I'd hire him again... but at those rates it's worth me doing anything I can myself even if it takes me 5x longer.)
Comment by quickthrowman 4 days ago
Comment by rogerrogerr 4 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 3 days ago
Comment by lotsofpulp 4 days ago
Comment by danans 4 days ago
Don't forget health insurance for when they have to use that sick time to get treatment - so they can get back to work ASAP. Plus, during a bust if they get laid off, we don't have universal health insurance, so they have to factor that in as well.
Comment by Marsymars 4 days ago
Obviously my electrician isn't making anywhere close to $30040 hours52 weeks = $600k+/year - and I don't begrudge my electrician making a good living.
But from my perspective as a homeowner, skilled trades are punishingly expensive, and my response was to a post specifically claiming that the pay sucks.
Comment by lotsofpulp 4 days ago
My post is a response to yours, showing that the provider’s pay can suck even if you find a service punishingly expensive.
Volatility of pay, body wear and tear, hours per day and flexibility of schedule, extensive travel greatly increasing morbidity/mortality risk, and other components go into whether or not pay sucks or not.
Comment by estearum 4 days ago
Comment by hyperbovine 5 days ago
Comment by HeyLaughingBoy 5 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 5 days ago
Could you be more specific? Things are still competitive in the large commercial electrical market I am bidding in, if you’re bidding to make more than 10-15% you’ll get underbid by someone willing to accept a lower profit margin.
Comment by metalman 5 days ago
Comment by bpodgursky 5 days ago
AI unemploys middle-class workers: AI is stealing jobs from the middle class!
AI employs unionized middle-class workers: AI is stealing cheap labor from the rest of us!
Comment by customguy 5 days ago
And "AI" as a concept has has no agency. This is all about humans who seek to further concentrate wealth.
Comment by gib444 5 days ago
What cheap labour? Tradespeople are not cheap (especially if you factor in the quality of the work). This just makes them even more expensive. Meaning a big impact on homes – you know, the things people and families live in, in order to survive. Pretty important
Comment by logicchains 5 days ago
Maybe those people should pay their tradespeople better then. Everybody's all "workers should be paid more" until they're the one paying the worker.
Comment by decidu0us9034 4 days ago
Comment by gib444 5 days ago
Sounds like you're assuming people are paying pennies for labour. I don't think that's true at all
While we're at it, how much should small bathroom, 2 week renovation cost? $100,000 in labour?
Comment by kasey_junk 5 days ago
The residential buyer is the source of much less repeat work, is harder to deal with, more price conscious and harder to collect from than the commercial buyer they could be working for.
Anyone that can competently market, manage, and execute that small job can do the same for better customers.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
The crew that can build a driveway cannot build a parking lot, and they will never be able to break into that market because it requires experience that a driveway cannot give. From a parking lot there is then road building - the previous companies cannot break into them. Again there are just not enough projects of the size that sits in between to build experience.
Comment by ProfessorLayton 4 days ago
This is not true at all! Parking lots are not particularly complicated, with the main obstacle being machinery and logistics. I know folks that started off residential and moved to commercial once they accumulated enough capital to buy the necessary machines to take on bigger commercial work.
Comment by lotsofpulp 4 days ago
Highly questionable premise. I bet very few people are going to gamble their most valuable asset on a newbie trying to learn the ropes. I’ll pay someone experienced multiples more for my once in a decade or two capital projects on my home.
Comment by SoftTalker 4 days ago
Comment by phil21 4 days ago
Obviously much more than 2 weeks worth of work at a commercial job, since that's the worst possible kind of work you could ever offer any tradesman. Maybe 8x the hourly rate would be fair since it's intermittent work with generally horrible customers?
It's been interesting to watch the IT/engineering classes all of a sudden pretend to care about labor costs and outsourcing/job loss. As an industry they have been by far the most impactful in reducing wages, enabling outsourcing, and "gaining efficiency" via automation while as a class being paid top-tier wages for doing so. There is not another industry more directly culpable for blue collar job loss except perhaps finance and banking.
Only now when the shoe is on the other foot do such folks seem to care at all.
Learn to code indeed.
For any electricians/plumbers/etc. out there? Go get yours. When the shoe was on the other foot you were mocked and told to switch careers, lowballed on horrible residential projects, told to skill up and get better if you wanted to get paid more, there was no future in the trades, etc. Make hay while the sun shines and ignore the bleating. At least this time around the bubble is sharing a bit of that tech wealth.
Comment by ieatcandlewax 4 days ago
yeah instead they did the smart thing and they got together and passed protectionist policy to artificially inflate the value of their labor. Let's see how union tough you are when the administration changes and you have to compete with a global labor pool again.
Comment by bbradley406 4 days ago
I don't really think electricians have to worry about that. There may be the some shops that employ immigrants as helpers, but most electricians have spent at least several years getting their hours, building their kit and learning the NEC + local codes. It's hard to picture companies importing labor and training them for so long.
Comment by gib444 4 days ago
Comment by paul7986 5 days ago
Just learned of a new acronym today "NILF," not in the labor force with over one million supposed NILFs out there -- dropped out and gave up.
Comment by anthk 4 days ago
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by rootsudo 4 days ago
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Working day and night isn't helpful as the limit to speed is waiting for the mortar to cure before doing the next row. (Generally you do about 5 rows and then wait a day)
Comment by rootsudo 1 day ago
Comment by paul7986 4 days ago
The blue collar job boom is great present day, but what they are helping build is their machine driven replacement.
Maybe this all sounds hyperbolic, but it's what Musk and all the AI overlords have said as far back as a 2013 or prior. Musk and Altman have noted the need for everyone to be on welfare (Universal Basic Income) since then. And no doubt we see this taking shape now within white collar jobs that once we held in high regard like programming being replaced by AI. I just created a whole startup web design, front-end, back-end development, native iPhone app, Android app and more using Codex (previously i hired others to help me a UI Design Front End guy).
Comment by Shitty-kitty 4 days ago
Comment by captainbland 4 days ago
Comment by danans 4 days ago
Hate to break it to you but it is happening, increasingly at the business stakeholder interface later.
> A compiler is already doing 99% of the actual coding when you realize that the only language computers understand is assembly.
Most of the value in the software engineering process isn't in the compiler, it's in deducing the requirements and weighing tradeoffs for various solution paths. LLMs have now automated the next step: translating human language requirements and specifications to code.
The compiler is just the last deterministic step, which while essential, is entirely commoditized in the value chain. When was the last time you paid for a compiler?
Comment by paul7986 4 days ago
But, Codex does and just by typing I just published a startup in python in two weeks using Codex and it's iPhone app will be available soon.
How do you not think AI will not destroy programming jobs if anyone can type to create anything they want or share your screen with Codex and have it guide you via voice? I just feed screenshot after screenshot to Codex to understand what I need to do next. Look forward to being able to share my screen and have it guide me via a voice conversation.
Comment by someothherguyy 4 days ago
Extrapolate that to any other engineering or even medical discipline and you will understand that your conclusion has some flaws.
Comment by paul7986 4 days ago
Comment by Shitty-kitty 3 days ago
Comment by Shitty-kitty 4 days ago
Similarly, programmers have a name for code generated without a coder guiding and reviewing, A.I slop.
Comment by paul7986 4 days ago
Things change and this change is hard for sure ... i'm living it and embracing the change by becoming a vibe coder and starting up businesses.
As for UI Gemini created the same type of UI I would've yet I did tell it what was needed following my years/years of design experience (less is always more).
Comment by Shitty-kitty 4 days ago
Comment by paul7986 4 days ago
Comment by anigbrowl 5 days ago
The people losing jobs to AI can't just pivot into the trades. When you think about it, companies announcing they're pivoting into some other area where they have no prior background is usually a bit of a desperation move, aided by the fact that companies don't need to be licensed in any way to offer particular services, other than maybe in the military/national security sector.
As for the second point, it's true that this is just old-fashioned supply and demand. I predict the outcome is that there's a rush into the construction/contracting sector followed by a bust due to either the tech bubble popping and construction slowing way down, or the replacement of construction workers by humanoid robots, or perhaps some better form factor like robot spiders that can squeeze into small places - all the benefits of child labor but with double the appendages and double the productivity!
However, I'm not worried about the possibility of a robot takeover. The American people's final safeguard against a robot uprising is the irrationality of imperial weights and measures. Robots are digitals and can't do fractions like us higher beings. That's why I'm building my data centers measuring everything in cubits.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by anigbrowl 3 days ago
Comment by vouaobrasil 5 days ago
Comment by palmotea 5 days ago
> AI unemploys middle-class workers: AI is stealing jobs from the middle class!
> AI employs unionized middle-class workers: AI is stealing cheap labor from the rest of us!
Come on, you've got to know it's not going to employ those "unionized middle-class workers" for long. Their jobs are sort of like these jobs: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/10/business/ai-white-collar-... ("people participat[ing] in feeding their own careers into the A.I. wood chipper...Many people who contract for these companies understand that this is a short-term opportunity...before they themselves are automated out of the job").
And yeah, there's "sort of no winning" when you're gobbling up resources to build stuff people don't like.
Comment by SR2Z 5 days ago
I'm not even sure it's as simple as "stuff people don't like." Many of the anti-AI crowd use ChatGPT which kind of complicates the question of "do they REALLY dislike it?"
I guess you could complain that robots will replace electricians and carpenters, but it's still going to be a decade before anyone trusts an LLM to wire a house.
Comment by palmotea 5 days ago
Not more "revealed choice" BS. There's no free choice: even if someone doesn't want to use ChatGPT, they may not be allowed to avoid it. I'm literally forced to use it at work, for instance. Others may be forced to use it due to market or other pressures.
Personally, I wouldn't mind of someone dropped a couple cluster bombs on each of these AI data centers, after construction is complete, and LLMs just disappeared as a practical technology.
> I don't think that ANY project employs electricians and carpenters for long, because they are there to build something that will ideally last decades or more...
See my reply to the other guy who made the same point before you did.
Comment by SR2Z 5 days ago
I'm not even talking about at work, I'm saying that a large majority of Americans are using AI of their own free will in situations where it's not required but is genuinely useful. The sheer number of people means that a lot of them must also say they're anti-AI, and my point is that whether or not they say they like it they're undeniably choosing to use it.
> Personally, I wouldn't mind of someone dropped a couple cluster bombs on each of these AI data centers, after construction is complete, and LLMs just disappeared as a practical technology.
This would be great if your goal was limiting AI access to the rich, but I'm pretty sure that would be much worse than democratizing access.
> See my reply to the other guy who made the same point before you did.
Yeah, and I still don't get it. Do you think that qualified electricians struggle to find work? They generally don't, these skills are in high demand and have been for decades. You really haven't made the case for "after they gain more experience on a difficult and high-paying job, they're gonna be unemployed." Everyone in these comments is complaining about waiting lists and backlogs and you're acting like the opposite is true.
Comment by fluoridation 5 days ago
I don't think there's really a contradiction there. You can recognize the utility of something while acknowledging that, on the whole, it'd be better if it didn't exist.
Comment by SR2Z 4 days ago
Datacenters are fine. They're better than most kinds of industrial buildings, by and large they don't illegally set up fields of gas turbines, and their water usage is really not that bad compared to other large users. They make for a few nice, high-paying jobs. Sure, they're ugly and large, but this is America and we have no shortage of ugly, large buildings.
Comment by fluoridation 4 days ago
No, one does not follow from the other. I might campaign against the building of a road because I believe the funds could be better spent on something else. If the road is built, am I a hypocrite for using it? No. The road is already there. Whether I use it or not, the funds are already spent. I may as well use it.
Something can be positive under a narrow lens, and a negative under a broader one. There's no hypocrisy in acknowledging both realities.
>Datacenters are fine.
Datacenters and AI are distinct things. Someone can be in favor of one and not the other, with no contradiction.
Comment by SR2Z 4 days ago
Sure, great, but the two seem to be treated as one issue and opinions are rarely stated in clear and falsifiable terms. They stay vague because there really aren't that many good reasons to oppose them, and IMO sane discussion on the subject leads to "building these really doesn't change that much" or "AI slop is really not that different from any other kind of slop."
> The road is already there. Whether I use it or not, the funds are already spent. I may as well use it.
If you then hear about someone building a new road and you go "I hate roads and I resent these guys for building a new road" and then you go and use the new road too, I'm gonna be suspicious of your motivations because clearly you don't hate roads that much. If you said "I think we should build fewer roads because adding more lanes doesn't really work that well to reduce traffic" then that would be different; you wouldn't be a hypocrite for saying that.
See my above statement. Opponents of AI and/or datacenters rarely seem to say what it is about them that they actually dislike. Yes, I suppose they could be thinking clearly on the topic and have internally consistent takes, but then why the hell can't they articulate complaints that make sense?
Comment by fluoridation 4 days ago
I don't care. I'm responding on the topic of AI. I won't let you treat them as interchangeable just because you perceive them as treated that way.
>If you then hear about someone building a new road and you go "I hate roads and I resent these guys for building a new road" and then you go and use the new road too, I'm gonna be suspicious of your motivations because clearly you don't hate roads that much.
Cool, but you've specifically constructed a person that fits your narrative. What you said originally what the sheer number of users of AI means that some of them must be anti-AI. You went from a deduced existence of a broad kind of person to an asserted existence of a specific one, with no justification. I'm not sure your opponents are the only ones guilty of not thinking clearly.
>Yes, I suppose they could be thinking clearly on the topic and have internally consistent takes, but then why the hell can't they articulate complaints that make sense?
I don't know. Can't they? I don't even know who you're talking about because you're treating complaints about datacenters and about AI as equivalent. Myself, I don't think I've seen anyone be just anti-AI in the sense you said, of despising the existence and development of generative models, wholly and completely. Some people are concerned about the business practices of the AI industry; some resent the effect of AI on the hardware market; some are concerned about the labor market (even if they don't think they're in danger of being replaced); some look at it from the more physical aspect of it, as you've said the construction and operation of datacenters. If you treat these swaths of people as just one person, it's small wonder you'll think they flip-flop from one position to another.
Comment by danans 4 days ago
Something can have a great deal of utility to everyone while simultaneously causing damage to a subset of people. Electricity is universally useful, but anyone downwind of a coal plant is hurt by air pollution even if they benefit from electricity. It's not contradictory for those people to ask for stricter controls on pollutant emissions.
Likewise with LLMs, they can provide a lot of utility to enterprises and individuals, while simultaneously causing damage to those individuals.
Hordes of now-fragile white collar workers are currently trying to use AI to figure out how not to be rendered obsolete by AI.
People who live near proposed datacenter sites are using LLMs, while also facing spiking utility costs due to the AI datacenters, and maybe significant quality of life regressions.
Everyone is trying to figure out how to maximize their own benefit from LLMs while simultaneously trying to put the costs of this technological revolution on others, and everyone has different positioning in that race, depending on their skills, adaptability, and privilege. This situation will test all individuals, institutions, and societies.
Comment by logicchains 5 days ago
There's a word for that: hypocrisy.
Comment by customguy 5 days ago
I don't like the parts of the city that are full of concrete and (edit: lacking) trees. I still walk or drive through there instead of making a huge detour, I still use them because that's what's there, currently. I know processed food sucks, sometimes it's easiest to grab something that's quick to make or can be eaten instantly because the supermarket is full of them.
And even assuming it means hypocrisy, so? You think you'd withstand examination? Face the arguments, instead of using some abstract fantasies about some average AI critic that doesn't exist as an excuse. At least they're only hypocritical like everyone else including you, instead of acting like a 3 yo, "yeah but you're stupid, so".
Comment by fluoridation 4 days ago
Comment by palmotea 5 days ago
Where is your data to back up such an assertion? I'm not even sure how you could determine "of their own free will in situations where it's not required but is genuinely useful," except maybe in a yes/no survey question, which is suspect.
It's also worth noting that AI is getting shoved down peoples throats. Want to do a Google Search? Congratulations, you're now using AI of your own "free will"!
> The sheer number of people means that a lot of them must also say they're anti-AI, and my point is that whether or not they say they like it they're undeniably choosing to use it.
Usually when people like you make points like that, they're trying to undermine the "anti" argument by implying hypocrisy. My point is "choice" can't actually reveal that, because the environment of that choice is too complex. The observation is a meaningless factoid.
Comment by triceratops 5 days ago
Comment by palmotea 5 days ago
And then there's the fucked up resource allocation: throwing around insane amounts of money, driving up the prices of things the people actually want, to build hated things for investors and billionaires, which is a separate issue.
Comment by triceratops 4 days ago
The fucked up resource allocation is itself an indicator of wealth inequality. A generation ago growing companies had to go public to access funding. Now they can find all the capital they need in private markets.
Comment by higginsniggins 4 days ago
Comment by jorblumesea 4 days ago
Comment by heaney-555 5 days ago
Who on Earth are you to decide what is the "better" use for labor? And do you scrutinize every construction project or only AI?
Is it a waste when contractors build a temporary set for a trashy reality TV show? A factory that makes cosmetics for dogs?
Having someone the arbiter of what is the "right" use of labor is communism. In capitalism, people get to decide for themselves what they work on and what they buy.
Comment by Teever 4 days ago
Comment by Gud 4 days ago
Comment by 4chandaily 4 days ago
Comment by Gud 4 days ago
FWIW I am a high voltage test engineer.
I used to be an electrician.
I would prefer to build the substations that power machines for the benefit of all mankind, rather than data centers that feed the already wealthy.
For example, keep the lights on for schools.
You have a warped view of the world if you believe anything should be allowed to be built just because someone has the capital to build it.
Comment by munksbeer 4 days ago
Comment by Gud 4 days ago
Comment by munksbeer 4 days ago
That's a fallacy, and it is moral grandstanding. It's a useful way to win internet arguments (and internet points), but it is just a debate ending strategy.
Comment by Gud 4 days ago
I argued against “if you have capital, you can do what the fuck you want”.
Comment by kraquepype 4 days ago
> In capitalism, people get to decide for themselves what they work on
Feels like there are some mixed signals here.
Comment by fl4regun 5 days ago
Comment by jeffbee 5 days ago
Comment by danny_codes 4 days ago
Comment by ElProlactin 4 days ago
You're missing the /s?
The only thing that has been keeping the US population from declining is immigration, and the US isn't exactly the most welcoming country anymore.
Comment by HDBaseT 4 days ago
Most electricians will make more than the average sysadmin, senior developer or network engineer here.
The amount of people getting into trades over the past decade has dropped drastically. There is no reason a fully qualified, even residential electrician cannot make 200k a year. Electricians aren't even the highest paid trade, plumbers are.
Comment by someothherguyy 4 days ago
Where?
BLS Data
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/electric...
"The median annual wage for electricians was $62,350 in May 2024. The median wage is the wage at which half the workers in an occupation earned more than that amount and half earned less. The lowest 10 percent earned less than $39,430, and the highest 10 percent earned more than $106,030."
Seems like there is overwhelming reason for one to not make $200k/year.
Comment by dahart 4 days ago
Where are you getting this? The median plumber in the US makes just under $63k, which is below the ~$65k median pay for all jobs in the US. The median sysadmin makes over $96k - a more than 50% higher median. The top 10% bracket for sysadmins is also 50% higher than plumbers. Why are people claiming that plumbers and tradespeople are raking it in when they’re clearly not?
> The amount of people getting into trades over the past decade has dropped drastically
The BLS projections for the next decade have plumbers at 4% growth and sysadmins at -4% - in decline.
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/plumbers...
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/...
Comment by emsign 5 days ago
Comment by jareklupinski 5 days ago
i like how you differentiated "normal people"
Comment by duplessitous 5 days ago
Comment by therealdrag0 4 days ago
Comment by duplessitous 4 days ago
I guess us "Normal" people prefer to discuss all relevant information and not just post jaded comments that defy reality
Comment by therealdrag0 4 days ago
Wouldn’t detached homes still need electricians and carpenters and their pricing be impacted by their demand elsewhere?
Comment by Theodores 5 days ago
But now I see the light. Jesus was a carpenter, right?
I am imagining that Jesus, with his carpentry skills, is driving right now in his Chevy truck to the job site, to help erect that data centre for one of our billionaire overlords.
Just saying, it could happen, and is probably needed to happen, if this data centre build out is to get anywhere near completion.
Comment by krapp 5 days ago
It's explained in the Book of Revelations - Jesus comes back and kills everyone who isn't Christian (and actually most Christians too) with plagues and fire and violence and burns the world down to ashes. And then (something something multi-headed dragon something something Whore of Babylon) a giant cube-shaped crystal city drops down from space lit by God's radiance and all of the dead Christians come back wearing white robes to live there and eat and drink and praise Jesus forever and never leave because why would you?
And belief in this is legitimately a big part of why we will never take climate change seriously.
Comment by michaelfm1211 4 days ago
Comment by MSFT_Edging 4 days ago
It doesn't matter that most Christians don't believe it. Most Muslims don't do violent attacks on civilians, yet they all seem to pay the price either in their home countries or in the US.
It seems world-wide, a hard-right extremist subset of religious believers are ruining things for everyone else.
Comment by Johanx64 4 days ago
It's actually not that particularly relevant what Christians believe exactly (and they do believe that the world will be destroyed as-is), what's relevant is what the actual crazy book says.
And if you believe the book that says crazy things, or perhaps you cherry pick and interpret the crazy things to your liking and convenience - his point stands.
And the crazy book days say that the non Christians will burn (for eternity?) in flames of hell and that great many Christians won't be able to get through the narrow gate (and also be tortured to death in hot lava).
Comment by calvinmorrison 4 days ago
Comment by krapp 4 days ago
You might have a point about Catholics in terms of sheer numbers, but... the only people still listening to Catholics are right wing chuds and Warhammer fans - and even the former aren't listening anymore because the Pope is too "woke" for them. The days when the Pope's word mattered are long, long gone. What happened when he gave his encyclical on AI? It made headlines for a day or two then the world proceeded to ignore the silly hat man as usual.
So I stand by my point. The Christians who matter as far as climate change policy is concerned don't care because as far as they're concerned this world just exists for God to burn anyway.
Comment by smalltorch 4 days ago
I don't recall this part what's the reference
Comment by krapp 4 days ago
The entire thesis of Christian eschatology is that everyone who isn't Christian burns in hell. And Matthew says regarding the end times "Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
Maybe you should read your Bible again, it's pretty clear that Heaven is meant to be a very exclusive club that even most Christians won't get into.
Comment by smalltorch 4 days ago
It's in the context of describing false prophets? It makes sense.
>Heaven is meant to be a very exclusive club that even most Christians won't get into
This is just false. At least be accurate if you have a major problem with the bible? I'm not really sure this is a great context to discuss further.
I was just looking for your reference about Jesus coming back to kill all the christians. Unfair to spout these types of things without some sort of basis right?
Comment by krapp 4 days ago
I see no evidence from the text that false prophets are being described. False prophets don't cast out demons and do miracles. I know the prior verse talks about false prophets (and do please give me a definition for that which doesn't encompass most Christians) but it's just an assumption on your part that this verse is exclusively talking about false prophets. False prophets don't tend to do miracles, cast out demons, and witness. These are people who seem to put in more effort than most, and are sincere in their belief.
>I was just looking for your reference about Jesus coming back to kill all the christians. Unfair to spout these types of things without some sort of basis right?
I never said Jesus was coming back to kill all the Christians, I said Jesus was coming back to kill most Christians and all of everyone else.
And that is simply and unambiguously the canon. The only point that can be argued is how many Christians are a part of the body count. It certainly isn't zero.
Comment by arkey 4 days ago
No, check this out:
"have WE not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?"
They are not sincere in their belief. Real Christians believe and rely in Christ and His work alone. The people this verse refers to are to the end clinging to their own merit and trying to earn their salvation through their own works rather than rely on Christ's perfect work on the cross.
Saved by Grace alone through Faith alone.
Comment by Johanx64 4 days ago
Man, this is bloody convenient innit.
"Yo, amma big piece of shit, but lets be real here, ain't gonna self correct that shit by my own merit and by doing good work!
Hell nah!
All I have to do is nothing, uh, i mean, believe in Santa for he died on the cross. That's all!"
Comment by ammojamo 4 days ago
Comment by arkey 4 days ago
But simplified, say you have a spouse who you dearly love. And say you found out that said spouse would forgive and get over any nasty thing you did to them.
Would that mean that you'd start being evil to them just because you can?
Or would that be yet another reason to try to live up to what such a spouse deserves?
edit: Actually, I think I misunderstood your issue with what I said. To clarify, a Christian will strive to do good and be better, but knowing that we'd never be able to be good enough, and that we can only be/do good through Christ, so we never deserve or earn our salvation (hence Grace), but we put our hope in Christ (hence Faith).
Comment by Johanx64 4 days ago
The incentive structure is set up to produce bad people.
Kind of reminds of the sight where MMA fighters brutally mash some dudes head in, and then afterwards starts praising the Lord and that only through Lord he has gotten where he is. Weirdest shit ever, and yet it's not uncommon to see it.
Imagine you have two neighboors - neighboor A and neighboor B. As they walk past you, they say hello and smile. But other than that they don't leave their house very much.
One of the neighboors prays for the humanity and wishes the best to everyone all the time.
The other neighboor fantasizes about torturing people and animals.
Now tell me, which one is neighboor A and which one is neighboor B?
That's right, you can't tell, because from any observable thing in the world, they are virtually equivalent, A is as good and as bad as B. Their inaction in the real world are virtually equivalent.
The only way you can tell who's "good" and "bad" is only and only through actions and results of their actions. Not their thoughts, best intentions or prayers. Only through their actions and results of said actions.
If they represent themselves through inaction, they are virtually equivalent - equally as bad.
Like if somebody steals your bike? Do you want (a) their forgiveness ("i wont steal again I promise") or (b) your bike back + due compensation for caused distress?
Thus - if you do and have done bad things - and you don't make up for them via direct sustained remedial action, but mere prayer and "asking for forgiveness", you're a piece of shit that deserves to burn in the deepest depths of hell.
For better or worse, this applies to so many so called "Christians".
Comment by arkey 4 days ago
But stuff like "but never really have try that hard" and "(but never actually do anything)" are your own assumptions and silly ones at that, you're putting too many people in the same bucket.
> If they represent themselves through inaction, they are virtually equivalent - equally as bad.
In regards to Neighbours A nd B, you're also right, but that's a bad scenario. Christians should thrive to lead a life that reflects the goodness of God and the grace they have received.
Some are rubbish at it, some are better and do amazing things. Same for non-Christian people, mind you.
But ultimately it comes down to: Christ died on the cross to pay for your sins. Are you going to accept that, repent, and follow Him? or are you going to disregard it?
The first option, if done from the heart, WILL bear good fruit.
Comment by Johanx64 3 days ago
Yes, but with Christians there's always some sort of thick-layer of self-serving dishonesty on top of it all.
Imagine a person goes out of his way and really helps you out in a tough situation, would you rather have it:
1. Be a person who does it out of his own volition - out of his own will and mind decided to do that - because that's the right thing to do!
2. Be a person who did it, because a book told him to do so - under a threat of violence no less (being tortured in hot lava!)
I'd always take (1) over somebody who's operating held at gunpoint (2) - threatened with torture for misbehaving.
> But ultimately it comes down to: Christ died on the cross to pay for your sins. Are you going to accept that, repent, and follow Him? or are you going to disregard it?
This is not a free choice! This is thinly veiled threat of violence!
And what happens if I "disregard it" (It being what exactly? Also - what sins?)?
Ah, yes, you get tortured in lake of fire!
The whole thing is just layers and layers of manipulative dishonesty stacked on top of each other.
Comment by arkey 3 days ago
At this point you're just rooted in absurd prejudice, this conversation is getting nowhere.
> because that's the right thing to do!
Quick question, how do you know what's right and what's wrong? Who says helping others and doing good to others is the right thing to do? Where does that come from?
Anyway, if you think Christians operate under/from fear, you understand nothing about Christianity.
Peace.
Comment by Johanx64 2 days ago
So, wait a minute, you've got no idea what's right or wrong - and you're incapable deriving and figuring it out on your own?
Thus, without delegating your thinking to somebody else or some book telling you what to do - you'd have no clue what's good and what's bad?
Imagine if instead of The Bible you happened to run upon a different book that says different things, like how killing the nonbelievers is right and blowing yourself up along with bunch of nonbelievers will guarantee you 10 beautiful virgins in heaven.
I mean, you don't know what's right or wrong on your own right, so you'd go ahead and do it?
See - if you can't figure out whats right or wrong on your own - without somebody else telling you (and threatening noncompliance with being burned alive or being promised immortality and goodies) - you are fundamentally incapable of being a good person, if only by accident - as running onto one book over another would completely changes your perception of "right and wrong".
It's pretty crazy if you ask me!
> this conversation is getting nowhere.
This conversation is going somewhere, it's just not going where you want it to go at all. Sorry about that!
Comment by arkey 2 days ago
I'll assume you think cutting the hands off someone who stole something from you is wrong. But some other people think it's the right thing to do.
What? Are you simply morally superior to them? Or is it that you've received from other sources than them?
Long ago slavery was globally mainstream and accepted until 'some weirdos' pointed to the Bible and said 'Hey, maybe slavery is wrong, according to this we're all created equal under God so we should not hold slaves'.
But no, I guess If you'd been born a thousand years ago you'd just simply have the moral clarity of condemning slavery, honor killings, and other things the rest of the world was happy doing?
> So, wait a minute, you've got no idea what's right or wrong - and you're incapable deriving and figuring it out on your own?
Would this mean that good and evil as absolutes exist?
edit: By they way, you never actually answered my question. Again, how do YOU know what's right and what's wrong?
Comment by Johanx64 2 days ago
Bible does NOT directly condemn slavery. Kind of worse than that, in the Old Testament it accepts it and puts out rules on how slaves are to be treated. The statement that Christianity is directly responsible for - or has anything to do with abolishment of slavery is absolutely baseless.
As far as Bible is concerned, it's “pro-status quo” as far as slavery is concerned.
> I'll assume you think cutting the hands off someone who stole something from you is wrong. But some other people think it's the right thing to do.
What's right or wrong doesn't change one bit depending on what other people think or what some random book says.
The goal here is to prevent theft, recidivism and to wholly compensate damages, right?
So, if you can achieve that goal causing less damage and suffering than chopping someones hands off, then that is objectively the morally superior thing to do.
You know there's this thing called a human brain, and if you can't use it and on your own derive some sort of Negative Utilitarianism or alike as your moral framework, then you're way too stupid to be a good person.
A person who can stop doing bad only via threats of most gruesome torture and promise of immortaltity and blissful after life, and wouldn't have no clue otherwise - fundamentally can't be a good person.
Imagine you're a God and you want to create freethinking beings that have free will, but you (for some reason, huh) can't create all of them "very good" to begin with, but it's more like random process - and large amounts of people created are inadvertently "bad". (seems pretty incompetent if you ask me)
So you have no other choice, but spawn them lots of them and let them "do their thing" and then at the end of it pick out the ones act well and DO the most good, and do the least bad.
Now, if you told them that doing good will let them into "heaven" and the "bad ones" will be tortured and burned alive, you're literally incentivizing (some of the most gullible of) bad people to merely "act good" under threat of gruesome torture.
You've created fakes and pretend do goodies - the self-serving dishonest kind of so called Christians (ie. vast majority of them)
The ones that don't do bad things on their own volition and do good, because it's the right thing to do, but merely because somebody is threatening them with violence, and promise of eternal bliss.
Purely on societal level - if you can manipulate bad and stupid people to do less crime and less bad things - using nothing, but make believe threats of gruesome torture and such, that's a great brainwashing tool to have. That however doesn't turn them into "good people" that can be trusted.
Comment by arkey 1 day ago
I politely invite you to do your own research, so you don't have to take my word for it.
> What's right or wrong doesn't change one bit depending on what other people think or what some random book says.
So you do acknowledge an absolute of good and evil, right and wrong. Good. We got somewhere.
In regards to the rest, you're drastically limited by your ignorance and misunderstanding of basic Christian concepts, most probably conditioned by your radical prejudices and already formed opinions.
This conversation has become absurd in the sense that you're trying to convince me, a Christian, about what motivates me, or moves me, or about my understanding of reality and absolutes.
Keep your prejudices, you're free to decide, and you're responsible of your decisions.
You still haven't directly answered my question.
Have a good one.
Comment by Johanx64 1 day ago
I did actually!
> So you do acknowledge an absolute of good and evil, right and wrong. Good. We got somewhere.
It's not an absolute. "Right and wrong" exists only within framing of living beings or atleast the humans with a functional brain.
And humans who don't believe Santa and alike will derive their moral framework from simple axioms (such as pain and suffering is bad) that are universal across living beings on Earth arriving at something along the lines of Negative Utilitarianism.
> This conversation has become absurd in the sense that you're trying to convince me, a Christian, about what motivates me, or moves me, or about my understanding of reality and absolutes.
The absurd part is that you think this conversation is about you.
Not everything revolves around you. Ground breaking thought, I know.
> In regards to the rest, you're drastically limited by your ignorance and misunderstanding of basic Christian concepts, most probably conditioned by your radical prejudices and already formed opinions.
So you're attacking me instead of refuting my argument or providing a well reasoned counterpoint.
Not that I expected more from a Christian. Sigh
Comment by Theodores 4 days ago
I had the guy rocking up in his truck to spend a day doing carpentry for our AI overlords, and could not see the magic wand.
So now we have him solving the world's problems by killing everyone, apart from a few good people, so have we moved on from a magic wand to a magic wonder weapon?
We should be scared of this man coming back, not waiting patiently for thousands of years. Honestly, I try my hardest to understand it, but I see a greater chance of vast AI data centers in space due to a shortage of resources on earth.It is not going to happen.
Comment by zapataband1 5 days ago
Comment by goodpoint 5 days ago
Comment by autoexec 4 days ago
I don't think we have to worry about "AI" being capable of replacing electricians and carpenters any time soon and that's ignoring all the unsolved problems with the robotics.
It's nice to have sci-fi fantasies and everything, but in the real world tradespeople are going to be around for a very very long time. They won't be building data centers for that long though. This is a short term hike in demand that just isn't going to last.
Comment by goatlover 5 days ago
Comment by saturn8601 5 days ago
I hear China is doing a lot of this already to stave off their upcoming demographic collapse. I haven't seen raw details or videos though other than demonstration stuff (anyone have anything to share?)
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Factories have been automating for decades. Last factory tour I took they said in 1950 this plant had over 2000 employees working, now (2019) about 200. Then he pointed to the laser cutter which alone replaced 150 workers with just 2. This factory is not considered very automated by modern standards either.
Comment by saturn8601 4 days ago
Already products are designed for robotic automation: reduce fasteners, make a single piece do more, make sure a blind one armed dumb person can put the thing together(thats basically the industrial single arm robots you have in factories today).
Still maybe this time is different...but to be fair I put the caveat that you must design the product from the ground up for this new kind of potential automation. (I was talking about the new bipedal vision robots not the old school industrial robot arms) What that looks like? Well the Chinese are probably cooking something up for sure and hopefully somewhere in the US its happening as well.
Comment by anigbrowl 4 days ago
Repair/remodeling is challenging because you need (approximate) knowledge of construction techniques from across a 150 year timespan, buildings settle and change shape over time, and generally owners don't usually want the building completely gutted and rebuilt from scratch. But it's not that hard. New construction is relatively straightforward. The biggest challenges for construction robots will be handling dust/debris (25% of construction work is cleaning things up) and maintaining health and safety (of the robots themselves; self-preservation is a skill that has to be learned).
That said I don't think you'll see this with the current generation of humanoid robots. A lot of the design assumptions seem almost comically wrong to me.
Comment by Mawr 4 days ago
It all comes down to robots being unable to hold and operate anything in 3d space, much less precision tooling in arbitrary environments, which is basically what construction is. Everything in construction needs extensive planning, then to be done in the exact right order, with almost perfect precision.
The idea that you could tell a robot how you want a house remodeled and that it'd be able to go from there to actually do it is frankly asinine.
We don't have robots at all, much less humanoid ones, not even doing comparatively trivial, fixed tasks like laundry or the dishes, and you think we're going to have them manage the infinitely complex task of remodeling a house? Your mental model of robotics is completely wrong.
Comment by anigbrowl 3 days ago
Comment by netsharc 5 days ago
Comment by heaney-555 5 days ago
Comment by Animats 4 days ago
For those who haven't noticed, the US/Israel/Iran war and the Ukraine/Russia war just merged. Countries currently shooting at each other: Ukraine, Russia, Iran, Israel, US, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Jordan, Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait... See the lead story in the New York Times for the past two days.
This war has crossed an important threshold. No pair of countries, one on each side, can stop the war now. The US and Iran can no longer stop it alone. Ukraine and Russia can no longer stop it alone. This is very like WWI - too many combatants with differing motivations. This much isn't a projection. This is the current reality.
It looks like a long war. Expect a very large, expensive military buildup. That's going to need war plants, built in a hurry. Ammunition. Weapons. Drones by the millions.
Comment by gpt5 4 days ago
You are reading too much into the current media hype cycle, and not really reading the geopolitics in place, which puts a lot of pressure internally on these countries to not escalate further. This includes both Ukraine / Russia and the middle east which you are so eager to tie together on the slightest connection.
Comment by bawolff 4 days ago
Iran is friends with Russia and has helped them with their weapons program in the past. None of the countries allied with Ukraine like Iran. Iran (and its allies) have almost no ability to counter strike Ukraine.
Ukraine picking a fight with Iran, or at least stopping their boats from visiting Russian ports, seems like a strategy Ukraine could plausibly persue without too much downside.
Comment by dgoldstein0 4 days ago
Comment by bawolff 4 days ago
True, but those are probably in relatively short supply for them at this point. I'd imagine they would want to save them for Israel.
Comment by tedd4u 4 days ago
Comment by Animats 3 days ago
Comment by hermitShell 4 days ago
Comment by bawolff 4 days ago
Comment by afavour 4 days ago
In what way?
> No pair of countries, one on each side, can stop the war now. The US and Iran can no longer stop it alone. Ukraine and Russia can no longer stop it alone.
It seems to me like you’re undermining your point here. No two sides can stop it alone because they are separate conflicts. The US and Iran can agree to stop fighting. Ukraine and Russia can do the same. The reason they don’t affect each other is because they’re separate conflicts.
Comment by bawolff 4 days ago
> In what way?
Presumably they are referencing Ukraine recently shooting an Iranian (i believe) merchant ship.
However its kind of silly to say the wars have merged based on a single incident. We dont even know if it was intentional.
Comment by RussianBot9580 4 days ago
In the case of USA/Iran the US is essentially Israel's proxy. It's up to Israel to decide when the fighting stops. OK, fine, Iran could capitulate and essentially stop being a country. They'll get right on that.
In the case of Ukraine/Russia Ukraine is a US+EU proxy. It is up to the EU leadership to decide when the fighting stops. OK, fine, Russia could capitulate and stop being a country. They'll get right on that.
Comment by altmanaltman 4 days ago
Also why would you not include Afghanistan and its war with Pakistan or China's various diplomatic issues with its neighbors?
Why would you ignore all the wars and conflict going on in rest of the African continent?
Your comment come across trying to piece together a particular vision of world conflicts that maps neatly into suiting a narrative. You say its the current reality but its only a slice of the current reality and a lot of it is factually wrong.
Comment by Animats 4 days ago
Comment by lelanthran 4 days ago
Maybe it's a non-conductive oil? I recall seeing someone who overclocked their PC (circa 2005) to 5GHz, and ran the motherboard completely submerged in an oil bath.
Comment by quickthrowman 4 days ago
It works like a nuclear power plant cooling system if you want to look an a diagram that is easily available. The radiated core water loop is equivalent to the rack water loop and the cooling water piping is equivalent to the chilled water loop, the difference being that data centers recirculate their chilled water loop water while nuclear plants generally discharge the water after it has passed through cooling towers.
Comment by CuriouslyC 4 days ago
Comment by Esras 4 days ago
Comment by Animats 4 days ago
This was being talked about more in 2025 than it is now. Nobody seems to have deployed a 1MW rack yet. There are major problems to be solved for that level of power density. The fire protection people want racks in fireproof enclosures with a built in inert gas extinguishing system and smoke detectors that pull in air from many points for very fast detection. The cooling people talk about 400 gallons per minute of chilled glycol. The power people talk about arc flash protection and worker safety.
This is a scary level of energy density. Not hopeless; the switchgear and semiconductor inside locomotives are at comparable levels.
[1] https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-800-v-hvdc-architec...
[2] https://blog.se.com/datacenter/2025/10/16/the-1-mw-ai-it-rac...
[3] https://flex.com/resources/megawatt-racks-are-coming-how-800...
Comment by quickthrowman 4 days ago
800VDC is insanely scary stuff.
> At present, no consensus standard provides a validated methodology for calculating direct current (dc) arc-flash incident energy.
This means that establishing proper PPE for DC arc flashes is not possible right now. If I was asked to provide electricians to work on these racks, I would only allow my electricians to approach them, let alone do any work, if they were de-energized, full stop. Even inspecting anything while they’re energized (without doing any work) would be insane, in my opinion. Nobody’s life is worth losing over a rack of servers, and the incident energy for a 480V AC circuit that can power a 1 MW rack (1503 amps) can exceed 40 cal per cm^2 depending on the electrical system already, and there is no PPE that protects you above that incident energy level.
Comment by Animats 1 day ago
Comment by eichin 4 days ago
Comment by cucumber3732842 4 days ago
Comment by Frieren 4 days ago
Because these are not AI companies, these are infrastructure companies as their main source of revenue and cost is renting and building infrastructure.
Comment by torginus 4 days ago
Comment by Zsfe510asG 5 days ago
RAM manufacturers are falling, and today after the MSFT numbers are out we'll see additional CapEx worries.
Comment by throwawayffffas 4 days ago
1. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-koreas-kosp...
Comment by notesinthefield 4 days ago
Comment by jongjong 4 days ago
The challenge in both cases is all the invisible, hard-to-describe stuff that people are doing which business people take for granted.
Business people don't consider "minimizing complexity" to be something software engineers do, but it's literally the most important part of the job for any large complex project and it's almost impossible to measure. Even humans are pretty bad at it but at least there is a limit. With AI, there is no awareness of this and more complexity means more tokens to sell today and in the future to maintain so there is a perverse incentive and no guardrails.
Also, software engineers make a lot of decisions based on human factors and factors that are unique to the company/project.
For electricians, the part which AI struggles to automate is robotics and stuff like travelling to the job location, ensuring the right cables are available, identifying the right port to plug the cables into, drilling holes if necessary, climbing into the ceiling, pulling rolls of cables along the ceiling or wall with appropriate attachments, setting up the electrical boxes.
I think in the near future, all manual jobs will be replaced by a combination of specialist robots and generalist "human minders"; a minder will be transferrable across any industry and the entire job will be exception handling any unexpected issues which the engineers didn't yet train or program into the specialist robots.
Comment by bigfatkitten 1 day ago
It’s not that we can’t do it today, it’s because like orbital data centres, it is nowhere close to being economically sensible.
Electrical and other safety-critical work very sensibly requires a skilled human to sign off on the results. This important safety requirement seems incompatible with your vision.
Comment by lstodd 4 days ago
Dream on.
Comment by dang 2 days ago
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful. You're welcome here, but we're really trying for a different kind of internet discussion, so we can't have commenters breaking the rules so badly.
Comment by lstodd 2 days ago
Comment by stuaxo 4 days ago
Comment by jermaustin1 5 days ago
I've had to learn a lot of skills this summer trying to get some repairs done on my house, and I've had to pay some extreme "fuck off" prices for work that I couldn't do myself.
My father-in-law is a construction manager for a large power company, and they've been expanding their footprint as well for these datacenters, and hiring like crazy to speed up their construction.
He said it will be a few years before the independent trades people become more available.
Comment by clarance 5 days ago
Quotes for other stuff like hardwood floor installation and finishing—a job I'd personally consider harder and requiring greater skill than installing a mini-split in a totally uncomplicated setting—was extremely cheap by comparison.
Comment by jermaustin1 5 days ago
The electrical work I need done is because the previous owner (my grandfather-in-law) built the house and did absolutely NOTHING to code, and inspection found none of this. There are splices in the walls, there is yellow romex being used as power lines to sub panels across the lawn, strung from tree to tree to keep it off the ground. The electrical panel is installed 5-inches from the washing machine... where there is water, and lots of it. There are 4 sub panels strewn throughout the house - it is 1300 square feet. There are random nutted romex wires just poking out of holes in the walls. Basically we need the entire house to be rewired.
Same with plumbing, there isn't a single valve in this house. Everything is plumbed directly from the cold or hot lines. So when the shower sprung a leak, we had to turn the mains water off, rip out the shower to fix it, then re-install it. And that is all over the house, as well.
Don't buy a house built by a family member, even if that family member is a GC that builds houses for a living, because they aren't getting paid to build their own house, and will 1000% cut every corner known to man.
Comment by SoftTalker 5 days ago
That's not to say a good inspector will find every fault either. They don't tear walls open, and they don't have x-ray vision. They only inspect what they can see.
Comment by saturn8601 5 days ago
Its very much like an experienced coder going into established codebases and being able to more quickly make changes and improvements. No codebase is perfect and they all seem to have their own uniqueness just like no house is perfect and all have their own quirks. How good or bad it is can be determined by the experience and foresight of the person doing the work but there will still always be uniqueness and quirks.
Once I finally internalized it, I really appreciated the history of my home and the things people did to solve problems as time went on just like a mature codebase. I would argue as long as the property is generally good, its just a fact of life to have to deal with the rest.
Comment by darkwater 4 days ago
As the saying goes... shoemaker's son goes barefoot.
Comment by markdown 4 days ago
Guys, take a look at Mr. Handyman over here, able to do the work of professional HVAC workers in only double the time.
Comment by cucumber3732842 4 days ago
You'll be enraged by how easy it is. And you'll be enraged not at the licensed trades for milking the system, but the white collar office types who act as if all this stuff is some temperamental voodoo that will melt down a nuclear power plant if you breath on it wrong.
Comment by pigggg 4 days ago
Comment by emsign 5 days ago
Comment by SR2Z 5 days ago
Comment by tomhow 3 days ago
Comment by SR2Z 1 day ago
I will try to be more obvious with this kind of comment in the future. My fault for assuming the sarcasm would translate well in a comment.
Comment by tomhow 1 day ago
Comment by jsrozner 5 days ago
Comment by jelder 4 days ago
Comment by jqr- 4 days ago
Comment by igleria 4 days ago
Comment by duxup 5 days ago
Comment by emsign 5 days ago
Comment by scotty79 5 days ago
Comment by jsrozner 5 days ago
Comment by scotty79 5 days ago
Comment by nathan_compton 5 days ago
Comment by scotty79 4 days ago
Comment by nathan_compton 4 days ago
Comment by scotty79 3 days ago
Comment by WarmWash 4 days ago
If you want to know what is in demand, look at what nice neighborhood suburbanites are doing.
Comment by danny_codes 4 days ago
Comment by Legend2440 5 days ago
Comment by 9x39 5 days ago
Amazon has hired so many journeymen electricians from our area that apprenticeship waiting lists have exploded. If you can assume that happens where the demand is being bought up, jobs could fail to emerge even if wages go up for existing experts.
In any case, the externalities like power and water draw or pollution rain down on the locals permanently, even if trades enjoyed a brief period of demand. It's not like a city emerging. It's a big warehouse that's pretty sparsely employed relative to its size.
Comment by SR2Z 5 days ago
If there is more sustained demand for electricians why on earth wouldn't more people become electricians?
Right now there's a supply crunch, but unless you think the US will keep building datacenters at this rate forever the problem will eventually go away.
Comment by 9x39 4 days ago
My point was that journeymen often at an electrical shop who have apprentices are recently at Amazon without apprentices because Amazon is bidding wages so high they (to some extent) abandon the apprenticeship system. The waitlist I was talking about doesn’t reflect new demand from entrants so much as a backlog that is no longer clearing as people rationally defect and go work for the data centers who have different priorities.
Overall, it will balance out but I don’t think the NYTimes should be let off for carrying water for capital trying to fix data centers PR by misleading people thinking this will create jobs in their communities or some nonsense.
Comment by SR2Z 4 days ago
Why is this a bad thing? It sounds like giving folks more pathways to make money doing this work is only a good thing.
Comment by 9x39 4 days ago
Sure, better for the journeymen. But it leaves the newcomers behind. How is reducing pathways only a good thing?
The system isn't going to be "patched" to allow otherwise as law moves very slowly. Normally, shortages drive prices which correct the situation as people move to arbitrage - but with licensed labor (which is good, sure, things burn down otherwise) that isn't a realistic mechanism.
https://finance.yahoo.com/small-business/articles/apprentice...
Comment by SR2Z 4 days ago
I think the villains here are the journeymen, not the people with electrical needs.
Comment by charonn0 5 days ago
Comment by wslh 5 days ago
Comment by cynicalsecurity 5 days ago
Comment by bluGill 5 days ago
You are also subject to the economy more than most jobs. When things start going bad you are the first one cut.
It can still be a good career overall, but it does have downsides and isn't for everyone. I'm not leaving my job even though I know how to do construction.
Comment by FrustratedMonky 5 days ago
Comment by bluGill 5 days ago
Comment by Aurornis 5 days ago
If you're unlucky, the job will be far away but below the cutoff for a hotel, so you have to choose between driving home every night or paying for your own hotel. Younger people sleep in their car some times.
Any long distance site starts excluding more and more of the older workers and those with families. It's a younger workers game for the most part
Comment by chasd00 4 days ago
the hotel rates in Abilene TX are comically high and all the RV parks are filled up too. I have friends/roots there so make the drive from Dallas every so often. The stargate datacenter is certainly a popular topic of discussion both good and bad.
Comment by Danox 5 days ago
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by Danox 1 day ago
Comment by palmotea 5 days ago
Comment by bpodgursky 5 days ago
Comment by Danox 4 days ago
Most of those data centers built in relatively remote areas. will have just a few people working at that data center. It’s not going to bring lasting prosperity to that midsize or small town.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by SoftTalker 4 days ago
Services that support farming.
Comment by palmotea 5 days ago
So? What's your point? During the boom, laborers from all over went to North Dakota to work in the oil fields, and for the unemployment to say low there, most of them had to leave. And, IIRC, North Dakota wisely refused to build too much permanent infrastructure to support that population, because they knew it would be transient. If there was much effect on unemployment statistics, it was probably in other states (though I would guess the effect was more on wages than binary employment).
My point is boom jobs evaporate, and give a recent example.
Comment by SoftTalker 5 days ago
Comment by emsign 5 days ago
Comment by Danox 4 days ago
If you know someone and you get into it, you can have a pretty good career I would not recommend being a non-union pipe fitter or even working for a non-union company in any trade (except a family business) not if you want to learn and do it right and have longevity and financial security, most of the unionized construction trades usually have educational training facilities thru the union or junior college for their apprentices coming up, non Union fire sprinkler companies are basically like picking people up from Home Depot.
Note: many junior colleges across the country have programs for the HVAC trade as part of their curriculum.
Comment by kxyvr 5 days ago
As a preface, in Texas, anyone in Texas can apprentice as an electrician if one is willing to pay $50 for a license. This requires one to work for a master electrician and generally as a helper for a journeyman. After 8000 hours (4 years), one can take a journeyman exam. As as a journeyman, one can work solo day to day, but still must work under a master electrician. After 4000 additional hours (2 years) and passing the master electrician exam, one can become a master and work fully independently. Most states are similar, but they are licensed independently.
A few guys dropped out of the program to apprentice. They were getting paid $16/hour to haul parts for home generator installs. Journeyman pay was around $30-40/hr depending. We were told that journeyman union pay in large metros like Chicago was about $50/hr. I'm not sure if any pay differential exists for master electricians if they are doing solo work. The real money in electrical work was by becoming a master electrician because then you could hire journeyman and apprentices to work for you and tax their labor. As with any job, the technical training does not prepare one to run a business and some people are good at it and some aren't. However, at the end of the day, it's capitalism. One generally becomes wealthy by having other people do work for you and you keeping a portion of that labor. It doesn't matter if it's electrical work, yard work, or computing.
Anyway, if one wants to become an electrician, great! However, you're almost certainly not going to get rich from it. I met some guys who followed some of the disaster/building booms running communication wires and they all got stiffed on their promised pay. That doesn't mean you will, but please don't think it's guaranteed.
Comment by quickthrowman 5 days ago
Journeyman union pay is over $60 an hour in Minneapolis and St Paul, $110 an hour if you include fringes. I feel bad for electricians in Texas.
Master electricians don’t earn any more than a journeyman, as an electrical PM I don’t care if you passed a test that lets you sign plans and open a shop. Union electricians have multiple levels, our locals use Journeyman, Foreman, General Foreman, and General Foreman in Charge. Each step up is $4-5/hr extra. The classifications are based on how many people they are supervising, but if you’re a good electrician, you’ll have no problem getting foreman or general foreman pay for solo work. Employers are only obligated to pay you foreman etc if you’re supervising but if you’re productive, they’ll pay you more to keep you happy since the company can make way more than $10/hr extra from a very productive electrician.
Comment by kxyvr 5 days ago
Comment by logancbrown 5 days ago
Comment by raincom 5 days ago
Comment by rokhayakebe 5 days ago
Comment by Aurornis 5 days ago
Trades work is hard. Traveling to a far away job site every day and doing physical labor in a building that isn’t heated or cooled yet is the complete opposite of our comfortable office or remote tech jobs.
If you’re dreaming about escaping meetings and annoying coworkers, imagine if most of the people you work around aren’t your coworkers at all. They’re other trades people from other companies who run the range of being understanding and kind to total DGAF about you or your job requirements because they know you being upset has no connection back to their job safety. This varies based on the site and who’s running it, but that also changes from month to month or day to day.
I say this as someone who spent very little time in trades related work before graduating college and who has career electrician family members. Trades work is hard. If you work on computers in an office, we have it so very easy.
Comment by chasd00 4 days ago
most of my extended family was hardcore blue collar (ranchers, welders, oil hands, etc). When they got older their bodies were pretty broken, most couldn't walk from one end of their house to the other after about age 70. That work is hard on your body year after year and it eventually just wears out. For comparison, my father was the typical white collar worker. He's a minor pickleball celebrity in Florida at 80.
Comment by gib444 5 days ago
And lots of tradespeople do very well. Many of the bigger houses round here have work vans in the drives. Many of them are landlords too with significant assets. My street is slowly filling up with rentals, mostly by landlord tradespeople.
I was just chatting to a retired one yesterday at the station and he said he was going to have an extremely good retirement until he got divorced and she took half of everything.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by obligor_io 1 day ago
Comment by sigilsack 5 days ago
Comment by draginol 4 days ago
Comment by captainbland 4 days ago
Comment by simianwords 5 days ago
Comment by giardini 5 days ago
Comment by andsoitis 4 days ago
Comment by zombot 4 days ago
Comment by giancarlostoro 5 days ago
Comment by h4kunamata 4 days ago
AI bubble is already here, watch people becoming electrician/carpenters only for the AI to go sideways, then more hundreds of such workers unemployed.
Don't follow trend, look at what happened with IT and folks leaving university now can not even land job interview. Do what you love, not what it is trending.
Comment by 8bitsrule 4 days ago
Comment by AIorNot 4 days ago
Comment by nizbit 4 days ago
Comment by gattr 4 days ago
Comment by cmiles8 5 days ago
By all means go make money if the opportunity presents itself. I love to see well compensated trades. But be under no illusions that when the bubble pops (and it will) you’ll be tossed aside before you know what happened. So make money now, and milk these AI players for everything they’ve got, but just have a clear plan on what comes next.
Comment by signatoremo 5 days ago
Comment by saturn8601 5 days ago
Comment by AirMax98 5 days ago
Comment by paxys 4 days ago
Comment by Aeroi 4 days ago
kind of meta that the models running in data centers can now help the tradesmen building the next data centers. full loop.
Comment by kittikitti 4 days ago
I didn't expect anything more from the New York Times who wrote this suspiciously favorable article about Big Tech.
My take is that electricians and carpenters are a great profession. I have great respect for them. I would have also mentioned NVIDIA's worker programs to setup AI infrastructure but this article was too biased in favor of Meta.
Comment by einpoklum 4 days ago
Comment by 1saadcodes 4 days ago
Comment by obligor_io 4 days ago
Comment by grindmule 4 days ago
Comment by sigilsack 5 days ago
Comment by SadErn 4 days ago
Comment by ReptileMan 5 days ago
Comment by unsupp0rted 5 days ago
Comment by loloquwowndueo 4 days ago
Or to put it another way, a semiconductor, car or airplane factory wouldn’t really count as “infrastructure”, would they?
Comment by WarmWash 4 days ago
Then the public should make them look like fools and not pay for AI. But if people are paying for it, then they are probably capturing most of the value it produces. Paying Anthropic $20/mo is a trivial cost to recoup if it assists with your work, even at $60 or $100 it still makes sense for many.
Comment by badc0ffee 4 days ago
Comment by loloquwowndueo 4 days ago
Comment by therealdrag0 4 days ago
Comment by phil21 4 days ago
If you are for green energy and the electrification of primary energy this giant wave of unlimited private investment is the best gift you could have ever dreamed for. The fact we are doing our best to squander it is amazing to me.
We have a generational chance to build entire industrial supply chains and rapidly catch up from multiple generations of lack of investment in our electric grid but instead we are going to resist it every single step of the way.
Comment by estearum 4 days ago
Comment by phil21 4 days ago
It just might have to do with where electrical grid interconnect happens to currently be with spare capacity. These corridors also happen to be where it's going to be easiest to put up even more long distance high voltage transmission.
Datacenter siting has went from "where the fiber lines run" to "where we can get power" rather rapidly. I have friends who's entire job is basically trying to find locations where there is still transmission capacity available, and if not immediately, where it can be built out rapidly over existing rights-of-way to avoid as much of the NIMBY as possible. Projects that were taking a decade or more are now being planned for completion in 1-3 years. Delays went from permitting, lawsuits, funding, etc. and are now seemingly gated by component availability. These manufacturers are ramping up as rapidly as they seemingly can do so.
Transmission lines are by far the hardest part of the puzzle to solve. And yes, datacenters are about the only thing that has accelerated their buildout in my lifetime. I've watched projects that were paused for close to a decade to bring wind energy from the southern part of my home state to the metro load center area all of a sudden get jump-started again due to there actually being immediate capital available to build them and make it worth dealing with the NIMBY folks.
Datacenter siting is obviously more complex than this, but yeah - if you can get 80% of your transmission line from a power generating locating closer to your urban load centers you would be an idiot not to jump on the opportunity regardless of the reasons why.
Wide scale infrastructure build-outs are always messy and wasteful. Every single one in history has been. This is how shit gets built - not 20 years of careful planning and consideration.
Some of us have been paying attention to the grid far longer than this latest AI bubble craze. This was always coming for us, demand simply got brought forward half a decade or more. Eventually you run out of the investments your grandparents made and have to actually build stuff again. The US simply has collectively forgotten what that looks like.
There will be plenty of stranded misallocated capital. That's just how these things go. But there will be plenty of reusable infrastructure left in it's wake like always. If the US is ever going to reindustrialize at all, then this is about the easiest and least impactful means to begin doing so.
Comment by estearum 4 days ago
Yes, they want to put these things near existing power infrastructure (ie cities), but per NIMBYs they cannot. To the extent they can use existing power infrastructure, they are using existing power infrastructure and then only adding what they need. In lieu of a significant bust, this is far more likely to be a negative externality than a positive one.
Of course people realize this, so they do not want to build data centers nearby, ergo data centers are increasingly likely to be sited "in bumfuck nowhere," even up to and including literal outerspace.
Here, the positive externalities are basically zilch regardless of bust or not.
I get the 30,000 foot view that you are describing, but I am saying specifically in this scenario, for this infrastructure, in the specific existing political/economic/land use context we are talking about, I don't see the argument.
Past infrastructure booms have built infrastructure in and around cities. You have just described why that is increasingly not the case, and even if it were the case, it's only a positive externality if there's a giant bust, which feeds back into people wanting to keep these things away from cities!
Please identify a few of the specific infrastructure booms that you think are analogous.
Dams: nope.
Telecom: nope.
Broadband: nope.
Electrification: nope.
Fiber: nope.
None of these look like "build infrastructure in middle of nowhere where if the project succeeds, it consumes everything it created, and if it fails, there's nothing very useful for others to consume that infrastructure in those locations."
Comment by unsupp0rted 4 days ago
This doesn't always work, but the idea is in the long term it works better than the alternatives.
Comment by elmer2 4 days ago
I'm currently enjoying subsidized AI usage at relatively cheap prices from these same companies. It's cheaper than a cell phone bill and most people can afford it.
"Or to put it another way, a semiconductor, car or airplane factory wouldn’t really count as “infrastructure”, would they?"
No, but flying on an airplane 50+ years ago was only for the rich. Everyone I know now has flown somewhere, and it's very obtainable. I remember cell phones in the 80s being > $1 minute and a sign of being wealthy.
Capitalism can and does bring the costs of these things down.
Data centers will definitely benefit the public, as long as the government doesn't decide on creating their own monopoly.
Comment by edot 5 days ago
Comment by bmcniel 5 days ago
>Carpentry is a skilled trade and a craft in which the primary work performed is the cutting, shaping and installation of building materials during the construction of buildings, ships, timber bridges, concrete formwork, etc.
Comment by SoftTalker 5 days ago
Comment by toss1 5 days ago
Comment by ryanmcbride 5 days ago
Comment by NoMoreNicksLeft 5 days ago
Comment by pessimizer 5 days ago
I would bet that there is a ton of wood in these buildings that they are hiring thousands of carpenters for. They are not hiring carpenters to entertain the electricians.
Comment by NoMoreNicksLeft 5 days ago
I'd take your bet, while trying to hustle you to raise the wager.
Comment by 1970-01-01 4 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 5 days ago
Data center are tip-up warehouses with walls made of reinforced concrete, metal bar joists, metal columns, and metal roofs. Any interior wall framing is made of steel.
Comment by protocolture 4 days ago
Pretty broad generalisation.
Theres no wood on the data floor of a Tier 4 datacenter.
I am not convinced that every DC being built as a result of AI demand is going to be a brilliant T4 datacenter. In fact I wouldnt be surprised if theres a lot of shit going on in the US, which from my admittedly limited experience has some really shithouse datacenters as it is.
Theres a small DC operator near me, 10-20 racks, bit of a joke really other than their position makes them high demand by telcos. Last time I was there <10 years ago had MDF floors above their cable paths. Might have been a wooden partition too.
But to be a pain in the ass, my local T4 DC has a significant amount of timber in the foyer and break rooms. The meeting rooms too. My guess is, theres tons in the office area.
Theres also a ton of temporary construction hacks going on there are they expand. They had some temporary walls built across the common room for instance.
I wouldnt be surprised if carpenters were useful for things like, drop ceilings, liftable floor tiles, general dogsbody stuff.
Comment by quickthrowman 3 days ago
Pretty bad quoting of my post
Comment by protocolture 3 days ago
Comment by arjie 4 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 4 days ago
Comment by MSFT_Edging 4 days ago
Comment by deadbabe 5 days ago
Comment by tokai 5 days ago
Comment by quickthrowman 4 days ago
Trim, cabinets, and doors can all be removed from a building and it will remain standing. If you remove all of the wood from a stick-built house there is virtually nothing left.
Comment by BretonForearm 4 days ago
Comment by ragebol 5 days ago
Comment by jerlam 5 days ago
Those prefab factories may not exist though, and companies want to build out now before the market is mature, instead of a long-term play.
Comment by bluGill 4 days ago
Comment by luxuryballs 5 days ago
Comment by green_wheel 5 days ago
Comment by 1970-01-01 5 days ago
Comment by j-bos 5 days ago
Comment by fcatalan 5 days ago
Comment by 1970-01-01 5 days ago
Comment by Diogenesian 4 days ago
But even for a steel and concrete datacenter you would want a few carpenters for the interior where humans (at least occasionally) work, more to help with scaffolding and other temporary buildings (e..g housing) during construction, and building framing for drainage ditches and other landscaping. I imagine wood-and-nails carpenters are quite in-demand for most datacenter projects.