Apple's weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness
Posted by neilfrndes 16 hours ago
Comments
Comment by 40four 16 hours ago
I get the same type of nausea described by the author. I can’t read a book or look at a screen for too long without a feeling awful. I can also get it just from sitting in a rear passenger seat, especially if vehicle has poor visibility, and even worse with a bad driver. I have to really focus on looking outside the vehicle at the moving world.
Interestingly, I think there are people that have the opposite type of motion sickness. For example, my mom could never play arcade racing games without getting nauseous. The issue being focusing on a screen with rapidly moving objects and everything else in the peripheral being fixed, versus focusing on a fixed object and everything in the peripheral moving. She never had any issue reading a book in a moving car
Comment by King-Aaron 8 hours ago
Strap me into my race car on the weekend and pull G's in the corners... no problems at all.
Sit me back on the bus, I want to throw up.
The dots on the iPhone do help a little bit. I wouldn't say it cures me, but I can at least check messages on the ride without immediately feeling like death.
Comment by volkanvardar 1 hour ago
Comment by MichaelRo 3 hours ago
I do get the "reading phone motion sickness" a couple of days after heavy drinking. The hangover has worn off but there's this weird after-effect which gradually fades over a few days until it completely disappears. At first I thought how the hell do I get car sickness until eventually correlated with reading the phone and having to stop or else.
Based on my manifestations being chemically-induced, wonder if that's also valid in general. Some level of Gaba or something, which is normally lower in most people, gets elevated by drinking and then (hopefully) cleared.
Comment by King-Aaron 2 hours ago
Interesting observation. I only drink on one day of my weekends these days, so I don't think mine would be correlated to alcohol. But sugar maybe? It's an interesting thought that it might be related to some kind of metabolic process that's influencing that feeling.
Comment by orangepanda 52 minutes ago
I found your note on bad drivers interesting. For me, it's the quick acceleration, braking and turning that's the worst. A bit anecdotal, but I also experience car sickness less with women drivers. Maybe because they're usually easier on the acceleration and brakes?
Comment by dhosek 12 hours ago
Comment by xela79 1 hour ago
Wolfenstein FOV was way too low, something like <70, which caused that feeling sick, try to get games where you can set you FOV to 85+ and it made a world of difference. motion sickness =gone
Comment by dillutedfixer 10 hours ago
edit: clarity
Comment by cubefox 7 hours ago
Comment by ok_dad 10 hours ago
She also got motion sickness until she turned on the Apple dots.
Comment by 40four 11 hours ago
Comment by NetMageSCW 1 hour ago
Comment by ebbi 10 hours ago
It might do. I recently had a bout of nostalgia and wanted to play GTA4 again (as a Uni student I only played part-way through without being able to finish the story). I ended up buying a used PS3 to play it, but I couldn't get through 30 mins of it before feeling nauseous. The low FPS on the PS3 just wasn't sitting right with me.
I ended up getting an Xbox Series S. The constant 60fps on this console was a game changer for me.
Comment by port11 13 hours ago
Comment by gabeio 11 hours ago
I highly recommend people look through apple's accessibility features every major release they seem to quietly release some real gems.
They hid a whole app for sleep/chill/productivity/wellbeing sounds in there as well!
Comment by port11 1 hour ago
Comment by JumpCrisscross 11 hours ago
There is an automatic mode that works perfectly for me.
Comment by joshschreuder 11 hours ago
Comment by nxobject 12 hours ago
Comment by JumpCrisscross 11 hours ago
The crazy thing is if I focus on the dots (versus the text behind them), my nausea comes back.
Comment by fecal_henge 15 hours ago
Comment by xattt 15 hours ago
Comment by throw2ih020 4 hours ago
Comment by fecal_henge 1 hour ago
Comment by madaxe_again 12 hours ago
Comment by MBCook 15 hours ago
I just don’t use the phone when a passenger in a car.
If it works for you and doesn’t bother you as much as me, go for it! I wouldn’t be surprised that it works.
Comment by advisedwang 16 hours ago
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.panshen.mo...
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.urbandroid...
And even one that claims to work with sound:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.samsung.a1...
EDIT: Actually there's an enormous number of apps like this, many released very recently with similar style etc. Weird.
Comment by Pfhortune 16 hours ago
I can't vouch for it (yet) but am going to give it a try!
Comment by jerlam 15 hours ago
https://www.androidauthority.com/google-motion-cues-pixels-n...
I've tried some of those Android equivalents and they seemed to work on any motion, not on acceleration like the Apple one.
Comment by thejokeisonme 11 hours ago
Comment by usef- 10 hours ago
If I move my iPhone around in my hands the dots don't move, but on my android they do (ie are simulating a stable horizon as the phone tilts, immediately). I don't know which is more effective. I thought the iPhone one was broken at first and didn't have the best results from it, I'm hoping the less-subtle android ones will work better for me.
Edit: I read from the docs that Apple's works best when facing forward, and I was often sitting sideways on a train
Comment by lucb1e 10 hours ago
My only guess is some sort of processing, like wait and see if it follows the expected acceleration pattern (moderate initial acceleration from the unexpected-to-the-user car motion, followed by a stronger acceleration in the same direction as one's hands push the phone to keep it in the same visual place) but I'd assume such lag is precisely the issue VR etc. has and makes people extra sick. By the time you've counteracted it, your brain has clearly registered that the movement is disjointed from the visual input, so then it's too late for them dots to help right?! That couldn't possibly work (or could it). Very curious how this works. Like, surely it doesn't need to be connected to a compatible car?
Edit: wait, or the camera. That would be very battery-intensive (I guess theoretically it could turn on only 1% of 1 color channel on the sensor, but I'm not aware that this is a mode that the hardware/firmware supports), but when you move it yourself, then the camera would see motion in the opposite direction as when you're unexpectedly being moved such as in a car. Still seems unlikely
Comment by CGamesPlay 8 hours ago
Comment by twobitshifter 10 hours ago
Comment by jerlam 10 hours ago
They are using completely different approaches. Apple seems to be mostly using the accelerometer, to draw dots and visualize inertia. The Android apps are using the gyroscope, to draw a horizon.
Comment by IshKebab 1 hour ago
Apple will be doing full 6 DoF sensor fusion, and then processing the result in a different way.
Comment by Cider9986 15 hours ago
Comment by sunaookami 12 hours ago
Comment by jofzar 5 hours ago
It's mostly just Devs copying apples feature, nothing too weird about it
Comment by kraf 3 hours ago
Comment by ramraj07 15 hours ago
Comment by ascorbic 40 minutes ago
Comment by sowbug 15 hours ago
(The reason the permission is so dangerous is they can trick you into pressing the wrong button by relabeling dangerous text with innocuous text.)
Comment by advisedwang 14 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 15 hours ago
Comment by Groxx 15 hours ago
Or, it would be wild, if it weren't fairly obvious that this is just Google protecting their mobile ad revenue.
Comment by AndriyKunitsyn 12 hours ago
Comment by Groxx 11 hours ago
Comment by ncallaway 11 hours ago
Apps that are solely relying on analytics still tend to function when the analytics are unreachable.
Comment by MiddleEndian 6 hours ago
Comment by lucb1e 9 hours ago
Comment by subscribed 12 hours ago
Comment by a022311 1 hour ago
That solved the problem of ads in games much better than DNS :D
Comment by Dibby053 13 hours ago
Well, that depends on the other apps you have installed. Unless things have changed in newer versions, apps with no networking can still do IPC, so any app can for example use Cronet to make network requests via Google Play Services, regardless of the toggle, as long as sandboxed Google Play Services has network permission.
Comment by gf000 12 hours ago
Mostly asking it as a question, given that graphene runs Google play services (optionally) as a normal, sandboxed service with no special permissions might help a bit, but I guess unless you disable networking for every other service installed, this is sort of impossible to plug 100%? IPC can be quite the security hole.
Comment by a022311 1 hour ago
Comment by lucb1e 9 hours ago
Edit: although, I just remembered that it's actually as simple as sending "open this URL" intents to the Android equivalent of sensible-browser, which everyone will have installed. That does rely on users not understanding or caring about what's happening or it only works for the first user
Comment by subscribed 12 hours ago
Comment by ignoramous 10 hours ago
Cronet? Isn't that Chromium's networking library? How's that letting apps connect via Google Play Services?
Comment by Cider9986 12 hours ago
Comment by nopakos 14 hours ago
Comment by Cider9986 11 hours ago
Comment by a022311 1 hour ago
Comment by lucb1e 9 hours ago
Comment by captainbland 10 hours ago
Comment by linzhangrun 7 hours ago
Comment by sowbug 15 hours ago
Zillions of years ago, we were foragers. We ate what we found. And if we ate something bad, like a poisonous berry, we could die. One of the first symptoms of neurotoxin ingestion is that your eyes lose their tracking ability. And an easy way for your body to detect this is when your eyes and ears (vestibular system) disagree about your body's position and motion in space.
So we presumably evolved a simple rule:
if (eyes != ears) { vomit(); }
Which gets that bad berry right back out of the system.This is why these Android and Apple gadgets work: they restore visual cues helping your eyes match what your ears are telling you. It's why looking at the horizon on a boat helps. And it's why reading in the car gets some people so horribly sick.
Comment by dylan604 15 hours ago
As a kid, I was told to turn 90° so that the back and forth of my eyes reading were in line with the motion of the car. This was soooo before any kind of electronic devices. Hell, the radio in the car still had the giant push buttons for saving stations.
Comment by matt-attack 7 hours ago
Now you know why radio buttons are called that in modern UIs.
Comment by Hnrobert42 4 hours ago
Comment by ghostpepper 14 hours ago
the theory being, at constant velocity in a straight line, your body feels at rest, so you want to look somewhere that reinforces that. looking out the side window has scenery rushing past, which is the opposite.
turning sideways and reading sounds like a nightmare.
Comment by dylan604 14 hours ago
Comment by yonatan8070 4 hours ago
You read something, get reminded you have car sickness, then look out of the window to try to cure it and not vomit
Comment by basisword 12 hours ago
Comment by yjftsjthsd-h 14 hours ago
Comment by dylan604 14 hours ago
Comment by VorpalWay 13 hours ago
(I have also been on bumpy flights, no issues whatsoever, even when reading a book at the same time.)
Comment by nancyminusone 13 hours ago
Comment by robocat 11 hours ago
I would need to ask her if she gets motion sickness.
Comment by dopplr 6 hours ago
If I drink enough to get the spins, I will /not/ get sick when my eyes are open, even when my eyes are clearly dealing with nystagmus.. but if I keep my eyes closed for more than 30 seconds, I definitely feel ill.
Comment by c-hendricks 12 hours ago
if (areEyesDetectingMotion != isBodyDetectingMotion) vomit()
If it was just eyes and ears it doesn't seem like VR motion sickness would be such a thing.Comment by ummonk 11 hours ago
Comment by c-hendricks 9 hours ago
Comment by sowbug 12 hours ago
Comment by Sohcahtoa82 10 hours ago
https://otolithlabs.com/vertigo/
This site has been up for several years though with no product being released, so I'm starting to question if it actually worked.
Comment by thruclaudeall 12 hours ago
FIX THE CODE!
Comment by throw310822 15 hours ago
Comment by JusticeJuice 14 hours ago
Comment by faitswulff 13 hours ago
Comment by 0fflineuser 13 hours ago
Comment by sowbug 13 hours ago
Comment by rapidaneurism 4 hours ago
You might still die, so don't eat poison berries please.
Comment by raverbashing 15 hours ago
Yes it helps. As in getting you back to "barely normal". (Also you can't do anything around the boat because you're looking at the horizon)
The theory make sense but some people have the thing turned to 11
Comment by sowbug 15 hours ago
But I used to get sick playing Quake, so maybe I'm in the 11 group.
Comment by ziml77 9 hours ago
Comment by sowbug 6 hours ago
Comment by torlok 13 hours ago
Comment by sowbug 13 hours ago
I see trivial variants of your comment on almost every long-form article or comment posted to HN. They're so repetitive that it raises doubt whether they're written by humans.
Comment by tefkah 8 hours ago
Comment by GeoAtreides 2 hours ago
Comment by robrtsql 16 hours ago
Comment by kdheiwns 3 hours ago
They're also good when I'm on a bus/boat/train. I used to get sick quickly when riding any of those, but now I'm fine even with long periods. Cars are just more intense to me for some reason.
Comment by davidcann 4 hours ago
Comment by jval43 8 hours ago
Comment by 40four 16 hours ago
Comment by mmcclure 15 hours ago
Turned these on recently, and they work bizarrely well...unfortunately. Downside is that I feel like I lost an excuse to avoid devices for a few minutes while traveling.
Comment by recursive 11 hours ago
Comment by aaarrm 14 hours ago
He only had to wear them for a week or two before his motion sickness from cars was completely cured. Now he can just use his phone, without the glasses, in the car whenever he wants
Comment by jimt1234 3 hours ago
I suffer from motion sickness. It sucks. I'll try anything. If those goofy glasses work, I'll wear them.
Comment by MattIPv4 16 hours ago
Comment by tombert 15 hours ago
That worked fine for me, I've never gotten carsick, but for my sister could never do that; after reading for not much time, she would start feeling nauseous. Initially I think my parents thought she was exaggerating to get attention, but eventually she puked in the car because of it and they suddenly had no issue believing her.
It eventually led to them buying a cheap TV/VCR combo and a cheap power inverter for the cigarette lighter and using that for road trips, which didn't seem to bother her very much.
Comment by modeless 14 hours ago
Motion sickness is an overlooked problem. A large percentage of the population has severe, almost debilitating motion sickness. It curtails a ton of travel. Almost all transportation and tourism related businesses would stand to benefit hugely from a real cure, not to mention VR and even regular gaming to some degree. There ought to be an industry effort to fund research.
Comment by stdbrouw 13 hours ago
Comment by sergeykish 1 hour ago
From my experience bus was the worst as you can't get front seat, even worse were backward positioned seats. Train and plane were great. Car in the middle, depend on road and driving style.
If I was on bus during childhood you would know by stops it made. We avoided that by traveling by car.
Comment by roelschroeven 10 hours ago
I experience motion sickness more easily on planes than on trains or buses. Boats are a problem too, in heavy seas.
In a large plane with no or very light turbulence the motion sickness doesn't brake through, it's only an uneasy feeling. In heavier turbulence, or in things like a small Cessna or a sailplane it gets worse. I haven't had to vomit in these situations since I was a little kid, but I do feel bad from nausea.
Comment by modeless 12 hours ago
Comment by Sohcahtoa82 10 hours ago
There's a non-drowsy anti-sickness formula out now called meclizine, but I found it to be less effective.
Comment by tasuki 11 hours ago
Isn't it a better "cure" to look out the window rather than stare at a screen?
Comment by basisword 12 hours ago
Comment by davidw 14 hours ago
Comment by nosioptar 12 hours ago
Comment by modeless 14 hours ago
Comment by davidw 14 hours ago
Comment by modeless 14 hours ago
Comment by ethagknight 10 hours ago
Comment by virgildotcodes 1 hour ago
Posting here because I went the majority of my life without knowing that such a treatment existed.
About a year ago I flew to the University of North Dakota and spent an hour a day over 3 days sitting in a simulator that would spin faster and faster while the facilitator talked to me over the headset and kept me distracted.
Was nowhere near as bad as I'd feared, honestly maybe a 3/10 on the discomfort/nausea scale.
Ever since then, motion sickness completely gone. I used to despise boats, calling them mankind's cruelest invention. Taken many flights, reading car trips, hot humid boat rides in rough seas in southeast asia since and... nothing.
Would 100% recommend. I think you can find the program at the bottom of this page, it's $400:
Comment by kazinator 9 hours ago
From personal experience, I know that even if you go out onto the deck and look out on the ocean, so that you have a visual reference to the horizon, it doesn't help.
You can look out of the window of the car and still get motion sickness; it doesn't only happen to people who are engaged with something inside the vehicle.
The external visual reference doesn't entirely help the fact that your body is experiencing accelerations not of its own accord.
The leading hypothesis on motion sickness is that your brain interprets the mismatched motion sensations as being caused by a poison acting on your brain, and triggers a response to empty your stomach contents and make you averse to more ingestion.
This mechanism is not easily defeated by visual tricks. If they can slow the onset and reduce the severity, that is welcome, of course.
BTW, has anyone here tried the motion sickness glasses? This is an object which has a hollow rim, partially filled with colored fluid. The glass rims, as well as additional circles placed laterally near the temples, act as "semicircular canals": the fluid moves to provide a kind of horizon reference.
Comment by decimalenough 7 hours ago
Comment by anitil 7 hours ago
Comment by turbocon 6 hours ago
Comment by anitil 6 hours ago
Comment by jimt1234 3 hours ago
I've heard of people mixing Dramamine with a ton of caffeine, but I've been too scared to try it, like I might have a heart attack from all the caffeine. Actually, I heard Kevin Bacon suffers from motion sickness, and that's what he did to get through filming the 0-gravity scenes in Apollo 13. Or something like that.
Comment by apparent 15 hours ago
1: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/motion-sickness-g...
Comment by jeromegv 15 hours ago
Comment by Curiositry 15 hours ago
Comment by Angostura 16 hours ago
Comment by ourmandave 15 hours ago
Comment by isatty 15 hours ago
Comment by hex4def6 9 hours ago
You can give yourself serious motion sickness in VR if you grab hold of the VR camera and force a roll / pitch in this state.
One of the things some games do is during motion create "tunnel vision" when you move, shrinking down the size of the video feed and putting a black border around it. This significantly reduces this unpleasant effect. I assume the high resolution portion of your eyeball isn't used for motion inference, which makes sense.
I'm thinking this feature is exploiting this same peripheral vision cue.
Comment by Kyselica 8 hours ago
Using tunnel vision to blunt motion detection is a clever way to reduce VR motion sickness. It never clicked for me why VR games did that until you brought it up
Comment by qnleigh 7 hours ago
Comment by jborichevskiy 15 hours ago
Comment by normalaccess 15 hours ago
Comment by copperx 12 hours ago
Comment by joekrill 11 hours ago
I also recently picked up an EmeTerm wristband - it's basically a mini TENS machine for you wrist. I was super skeptical, but my sister recommended it so I tried it and it absolutely helps with (though doesn't always total eliminate) nausea I get from motion sickness. I'm not entirely sure how it works, but it seems like it may have an accelerometer and use that to decide when (and at what strength/duration?) to send a mild shock.
Comment by GreenSalem 8 hours ago
Comment by jbverschoor 4 hours ago
Comment by itchingsphynx 11 hours ago
One simple question detects motion sickness susceptibility in migraine patients: While riding in a car or bus, can you read without getting motion sick?
Comment by jodacola 16 hours ago
Can this same idea be extrapolated to a device that emits concentrated beams onto the surface of a book?
I'm thinking of those clip-on lights for books that allow one to read in the dark, but for this purpose explicitly. My daughter also gets car sick reading paper books while in a moving vehicle.
Comment by makerofthings 15 hours ago
Comment by ourmandave 15 hours ago
I get car sick easily but on open water I have to sit and watch the horizon or it's adios cookies.
Comment by MBCook 15 hours ago
I don’t think it’s actually driving specific, I think it just is based on the accelerometer. So it might work.
Comment by cloverich 14 hours ago
(am highly succeptible to motion sickness, i generally have the feature on at all times).
Comment by RandallBrown 11 hours ago
Comment by cloverich 5 hours ago
Comment by pugworthy 10 hours ago
So it makes sense with that model that you'd get motion sickness reading in the car. Your eyes are so focused on the fixed page you're not getting the movement cues you would if you looked out the window. The dots give you that cue somewhat subliminally.
I have a theory it could be slightly nauseating for one to try and read when not in motion while dots moved around the page like that.
Comment by moate 10 hours ago
So you might be right, but it can't be tested.
Comment by dsatrainer 10 hours ago
I get super car sick, like projectile vomit straight out of a horror movie sick, after an hour of staring at a screen in the car.
Awesome share!
Comment by rzimmerman 13 hours ago
Comment by taejavu 4 hours ago
Comment by NBJack 15 hours ago
Comment by felixding 7 hours ago
Comment by darod 10 hours ago
Comment by himata4113 10 hours ago
Comment by whycome 10 hours ago
Comment by himata4113 10 hours ago
Comment by ziml77 9 hours ago
Comment by himata4113 9 hours ago
Comment by cassianoleal 15 hours ago
Does it also help people who get carsick without looking at a screen?
I get carsick in pretty much any modern car, unless I'm the one driving.
Comment by cloverich 14 hours ago
These dots help tremendously. On airplanes and commuter trains and such, i just pop open phone and stare at screen, sometimes a blank note even. It has helped me clearly see: My brain does not perceive acceleration correctly. When it can visualize the motion with the dots, somehow that helps cue it in as to what is really happening. I am very often surprised at the direction of acceleration, ie when the plane is turning, if im not looking out the window, i think i would be unable to tell you if the plane is turning or not; but the dots are flying sideways off the screen - ah.
My favorite discovery which really cemented this, and a good correlary to how even looking out the window is not enough: When the commuter train stops, and is no longer moving, the dots on the screen will remain moving (forward, ie im reverse) a few moments. Or when the plane is taking off and shifts from straight to up, the dots often stop moving, or change direction.
This change in acceleration you feel, which is not merely "which direction are we going", is the part brains like mine arent picking up right. These dots help a ton. I wish i could embed them into glasses - one day!
Comment by cassianoleal 13 hours ago
For me it's really just modern cars. Older cars which are more spacious and have better outside visibility, as well as being better at transferring the sensation of movement and acceleration don't affect me in the same way. Trains and planes are also fine.
I'll try this out, hopefully it will make taxi rides a lot less dreadful!
Comment by xfil 14 hours ago
The method I've settled into for consistent results is:
1. Eat a full meal & hydrate 30+ minutes before traveling. Sometimes this involves overeating in a day, but the alternative is worse for me. 2. Take 6.25-12.5mg of meclizine 30-45 minutes before traveling (quarter, third, or half of a standard meclizine tablet depending on road conditions -- windy, hilly, and/or frequent stop-and-go traffic for long periods of time = half, while a mostly straight road with smooth acceleration = quarter). 3. Eat small amounts (periodic snacking) while traveling; more sugary foods like dried mango seems to work best. 4. Include ginger in any form with the snacking (sometimes I'll simply cut a chunk of raw ginger and take small bites out of it).
I don't even bother trying to read or use electronics while in a car or while on a flight during any taxiing or ascent/descent. Some buses or trains are circumstantially fine. Definitely will be trying some of the Android versions of this.
Comment by cassianoleal 13 hours ago
Ginger does help although not as much as I'd like. Eating in general does as well but even less than ginger.
Comment by lucb1e 9 hours ago
Comment by skyberrys 15 hours ago
Comment by dylan604 15 hours ago
Comment by cassianoleal 14 hours ago
Comment by dylan604 13 hours ago
Comment by cassianoleal 13 hours ago
Comment by globular-toast 1 hour ago
Comment by apparent 15 hours ago
Comment by ms7m 15 hours ago
Comment by apparent 14 hours ago
Do you find it is more/less effective on different kinds of devices?
Comment by arcfour 16 hours ago
Comment by justinator 15 hours ago
Comment by i_idiot 14 hours ago
Comment by NetMageSCW 46 minutes ago
Comment by wiredfool 12 hours ago
Comment by mmooss 16 hours ago
Not every passenger would want to see the dots; their range could be restricted to the user's seating area or narrower - the user placing objects under the dots as needed. Also, of course the device could be turned on and off.
The dots need brightness and color visible on different surfaces, but those could be easily user-adjusted. Also, I wonder if a grid would work. (Edit: For use with screens, possibly the background reflection of the device, with its grid of lights, would work.)
The real question is, would it work? Does Apple's solution generally work or is the OP just a happy anecdote? Is there more magic to Apple's solution than dots swaying with momentum?
Comment by ssl-3 14 hours ago
In terms of controls, it seems likely that it should seek to emulate whatever it is that goes on inside the inner ear, so that the input from our eyes better-matches the input from our ears.
I don't know how Apple's dots work (and I don't think my singular iOS device is new enough to try), but if they only respond to acceleration, then doing it this way should help establish mechanical limits: The acceleration (in any direction) of a car is finite, and always returns to zero.
Comment by wifipunk 16 hours ago
Comment by browningstreet 12 hours ago
Comment by modeless 12 hours ago
Comment by browningstreet 11 hours ago
Comment by chalmovsky 9 hours ago
Comment by ocimbote 14 hours ago
So the author is telling us they're having more work- and screen-time while on the road. Great, that sounds like exactly what we need...
Comment by NetMageSCW 44 minutes ago
Comment by zemo 10 hours ago
Comment by surfsvammel 13 hours ago
Comment by jondiggsit 11 hours ago
Comment by markus_zhang 15 hours ago
Comment by osiciwjdiwidu 15 hours ago
Comment by Sohcahtoa82 10 hours ago
These days, if you see a roller coaster train stopped on the lift hill, it's 10x more likely to be caused by the ride ops stopping the ride to confiscate a phone than for a breakdown [0].
A whole lotta wannabe influencers want to record a video of themselves on a ride.
[0] Also, most "breakdowns" on roller coasters are from the ride computer thinking something isn't quite right and stopping the ride as a precautionary measure. It's actually pretty uncommon for there to be an actual mechanical failure.
Comment by markus_zhang 9 hours ago
Comment by NetMageSCW 41 minutes ago
However, I can only ride one of those small fair rides that go in a circle or I will get sick.
Comment by lucb1e 9 hours ago
Comment by scrollaway 14 hours ago
Comment by iJohnDoe 16 hours ago
It should be a frontline feature to toggle on or off from the command center. It’s there once it’s enabled, but should be there by default.
Comment by lucb1e 9 hours ago
First thing I do on a new device is browse accessibility settings. They're among the most useful and I'm always excited for what extra features you can get if you just browse that section
For example turning off animations is somehow an accessibility thing, but it also just makes everything work instantly and you're not having to wait for animations to complete (which in the alarm app triggers a bug where it'll select the wrong hour if you didn't let it finish animating the hour dial before starting on the minute dial). Or finding out during initial browse that it can do autogenerated offline subtitles, that's a useful solution to know about when you want to watch a clip someone sent with relevant audio but can't listen to the audio
Comment by birdman3131 16 hours ago
Comment by nottorp 15 hours ago
As for this feature, I found out about it and turned it on, but I don't think it helped me much with reading off the screen while in a car.
It's interesting how many kinds of motion sickness there are. I have no problem reading in trains, or sitting in a car and looking ahead or through the window. But I can't read in a car, even with these dots.
Comment by axus 14 hours ago
Comment by bitpush 14 hours ago
Why do you want something useful like this to be with a company? Isnt it better if everyone in the world benefitted from this?
Comment by peab 15 hours ago
Comment by causality0 13 hours ago
Comment by pfdietz 6 hours ago
Comment by LoganDark 16 hours ago
Comment by josefritzishere 16 hours ago
Comment by blairbeckwith 16 hours ago
This article is actually the first time I've heard of this feature and I follow Apple news a lot, so I appreciate it.
Comment by mschuster91 15 hours ago
Had a read through it, stumbled over this one:
> We do not give subjects of our reporting the ability to preview or approve interview questions, nor do we allow them to review our stories before we publish.
In Germany, that would be considered strange - here it is established good practice in print/written interviews to hand over the final story to the interview partner(s) [1], especially when the interview consists of a lot of industry-specific jargon to make sure that there's some sort of quality control.
Comment by internet2000 16 hours ago
Comment by cadamsdotcom 15 hours ago
Comment by bmitc 9 hours ago
Comment by makeitdouble 7 hours ago
We're out from WWDC and a ton of marketing claims and PR has been thrown around. Taking any company's claim for granted would be foolish, and it is truly welcomed that they did try the feature and found some basis to the claims. I wish we had more of those.
Comment by qotgalaxy 5 hours ago
Comment by HDBaseT 7 hours ago
Comment by Unit327 6 hours ago
There's probably a meeting going on somewhere inside google/apple right now to work out how to cure humans of the need for sleep.