I Could've Rickrolled the FIFA World Cup. All I Needed Was My ID
Posted by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by albertgoeswoof 1 day ago
If you used AI to generate the blog post, did you use AI to generate the screenshots and story?
Comment by alexhans 1 day ago
I'm not against using AI for writing at all but you want to be careful that the output doesn't contain too much of this noise over signal type of wording that repeats and wants to just sell you something.
Comment by robeym 21 hours ago
Comment by V__ 1 day ago
Comment by mdrzn 1 day ago
It's not X, it's Y. And repetitions of three.
Comment by Abimelex 1 day ago
Comment by tanseydavid 1 day ago
Comment by sahildeepreel 22 hours ago
I am usually able to pick up ai writing quickly but didnt feel it in this case
Comment by joquarky 14 hours ago
For example, why is this thread the top thread in this post?
Comment by watwut 1 day ago
Comment by a10c 1 day ago
Comment by dgellow 1 day ago
The Unicode arrows is also something Claude is using really often: “Camera -> RTMP ingest -> MediaKind -> broadcast partners -> your TV.”
And the table at the end is such a Claude thing.
The general style, a series of short sentences that feel like they are building up a punchline is what tells me it’s Claude, but the whole thing does stink of LLM generation
Comment by luxcem 1 day ago
Comment by drra 1 day ago
Comment by bcraven 1 day ago
Comment by BrandoElFollito 1 day ago
This hunt for AI is sometimes counterproductive
Comment by Aperocky 1 day ago
Comment by joquarky 14 hours ago
Comment by chadgpt3 1 day ago
Comment by srdjanr 1 day ago
Not everyone who has something interesting to say is a good writer, and I think it's great if AI can help them tell their stories.
Comment by sevenzero 1 day ago
"If you want human attention show human effort" or something in that direction. I think this fits here just right.
Comment by gbalduzzi 1 day ago
Comment by AdminAccount 1 day ago
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by tlogan 1 day ago
But the haters are going to hate.
If you had not used AI to fix your post, I bet the top post will be complaining about your grammar.
Some people will always find something negative. Simple as that.
Comment by Aperocky 1 day ago
Honestly, no need to write 4000 words if the story can be told in 400. The story is what matters, not word count or "flow".
Comment by alexhans 1 day ago
It's just that this one in particular lacks one more edit pass removing some of the AI noise on branding-speak and needless repetition (AI tends to list things and beat the point).
Comment by gspr 1 day ago
I'm positive that a post complaining about the grammar would've been (rightfully) downvoted to oblivion on this site.
Comment by maciekkmrk 1 day ago
Comment by grayhatter 14 hours ago
I find the way I interact with the world is exceptionally different from the descriptions of everybody else. Some of the symptoms of such manifest as difficulty communicating... with most people.
There are a subset of people who I have not only no problem, but seemingly a drastically increased information exchange rate.
Do with that observation what you will, but I don't write for the lowest common denominator, the preferred style of AI, because I don't write for the people who cant be bothered to understand me. I'm writing for people like me.
n.b. Maybe you are writing for the lowest common denominator. In which case, say that: "Yeah I know it sounds like AI but it's supposed to be advertising, not a technical white paper or PoC"
> the AI just helps me get a baseline down so I'm not staring at a blank page.
If this was true, the top comment wouldn't be a complaint about how the voice of the article sounds "inauthenticlly human" or like an LLM. It's having a stronger influence on your writing than you're giving it credit for. It's on you to decide if or how much you care, but ideally you wouldn't be lying to either yourself or your readers.
Comment by robeym 21 hours ago
Comment by smsm42 1 day ago
Comment by gspr 1 day ago
I'm glad to hear the voice is yours, and I apologize for assume it was the AI's.
Comment by bschwindHN 1 day ago
Comment by nunez 20 hours ago
Comment by pqs 1 day ago
Comment by SXX 1 day ago
Comment by Vinnl 1 day ago
Comment by patates 1 day ago
We can adjust our expectations for people to take some time to make the output theirs.
OTOH, and this is me arguing against myself, maybe this is not too different than the million web sites we saw using the unmodified default bootstrap theme.
I guess my opinions as well as the response of the community are still evolving.
Comment by llbbdd 1 day ago
Comment by gspr 1 day ago
I don't know about you, but I'd love to read a fascinating story written by a relatively poor writer. But if they can't be bothered to write, I assume the story can't be that good.
Comment by Oranguru 1 day ago
Comment by gspr 1 day ago
I disagree wholeheartedly. I'm not a machine. I'm a thinking, feeling, human being.
As a mathematician, I can certainly appreciate precise formulations. They have their place. But this is not that place.
> Not everybody can write well, and this guy clearly had something to tell, and that is what matters.
I'm sadenned that he wouldn't tell it in his way. I'd much rather read his own (poorly written?) words.
Comment by holman 1 day ago
Comment by tagyro 1 day ago
I spent over 2 hours and a small (but bigger than 0) amount of my own money to report the issue by emailing and even trying to call them (they didn't have any dedicated responsible disclosure page or contact). After some time, they finally answered my emails, took down the website and "fixed" the issue.
When I finally applied for the role, got ghosted for a week and only after I wrote them again, asking for an update, I got rejected as they allegedly were looking for someone more junior - though the job title was explicitly "Senior XXX Lead".
Some years ago, I went to interview (in person) at a big European financial institution. As I got there around lunchtime, I happened to get to the front door at the same time as some employees were returning from lunch who, very kindly, held the door open for me.
I was in their office around their computers, unsupervised and unaccompanied, for 10-15 minutes, enough time to plant some O.MG USB-C cables.
During the interview, I had a chance to talk to the CTO and told them what happened and how I was allowed access in the office, and immediately saw his face change and quickly change topic, and end the interview.
Unsurprisingly, I didn't get the job - I should have probably kept my mouth shut.
Comment by srmarm 1 day ago
One question though, how do you know your feed would kick off the 'real' feed if you pushed to RTMP, does it just take the most recent connection as live? Does the protocol have a mechanism for dealing with multiple people pushing to the same endpoint? There maybe more checking on that endpoint and if course I'm sure most live broadcasters would have a live director to cut any feeds at their end if a dodgy feed popped up too.
A huge vulnerability nonetheless and a great write up!
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by aembleton 1 day ago
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by arecsu 1 day ago
Love your writing skills as well!
> I closed it immediately. But the damage was done (to my brain).
Laughed so hard when I read this one :D
Comment by Tepix 1 day ago
> Love your writing skills as well!
I‘d say it was heavily AI assisted
Comment by jdw64 1 day ago
Comment by ipdashc 1 day ago
No hate on the author, but LLMs just have such an annoying and overdramatic way of phrasing things. The content is worth reading, I enjoyed it! It would just be even better if it hadn't been turned into such a slog to read through.
Comment by jdw64 1 day ago
Comment by willdr 1 day ago
Comment by dawnerd 1 day ago
Comment by jdw64 1 day ago
What I don't understand is this: 'Show sincerity'—that is, a human value. If it were AI-generated, stitched-together false content, I'd understand, but I see quite a few interesting points.
Whenever I see things like this, I always think of Sturgeon's law: 90% is bad, and only 10% is interesting. I get that most AI-generated content is AI slop. But even back when only humans could write, there were plenty of clickbait articles.
I agree that GEN AI spam content is generally bad, and I also agree that some of it may lack effort. But honestly, I'm not sure this content is completely meaningless.
Regardless of the packaging, if the content inside is interesting and valuable enough, I think that's what matters. I guess we just see things quite differently.
So what I'm saying is, I don't agree with the idea that he didn't care at all.
Comment by anthonyeden 1 day ago
The broadcast contribution feeds I’ve seen in the past are MPEG-TS, not via RTMP.
Still a great find.
Comment by srfwx 15 hours ago
Comment by thrdbndndn 1 day ago
During COVID, lots of live shows (concerts, etc.) in Japan moved to streaming (and most of them stuck, so thanks to that, lots of large concerts today have real-time streaming, which is great for foreign fans).
Out of 10+ platforms, more than half have vulnerabilities that allow you to access the content freely (sometimes including the rehearsals, because they are also streamed internally), and on a handful, you can access the admin panel and, as the author said, stream whatever you want.
Most of them have been patched over the years (some are just the byproduct of them changing the backend/SaaS provider, though), but there remain some major providers where you can get content for free.
Comment by mjfisher 1 day ago
Comment by maciekkmrk 1 day ago
Comment by Ekaros 1 day ago
Comment by himata4113 1 day ago
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by patates 1 day ago
> I did not touch any of these controls. But they were there. Functional.
I really needed to push myself to read because it was very interesting and thank you, for doing the work and sharing.
Comment by rectang 1 day ago
> Server says "here's everything"
hahahaha
> Hire me (just kidding... unless?)
FIFA is a legendarily awful organization. In my weaker moments reading your piece I thought to myself how nice it would have been if someone more ruthless than you had been made an example of them.
Comment by divan 1 day ago
FIFA gets disproportionate amount of attention and, ofc, high-level corruption scandals, but I would say it's more like a by-product of the sheer scale of the football, and not a problem with FIFA itself. I believe most sports federations in the world are very far from FIFA in terms of governance, but also from facing problems that FIFA has.
[1] https://www.playthegame.org/publications/sports-governance-o...
Comment by alper 23 hours ago
I'm guessing this is not the first time this happened to them.
Comment by patate007 1 day ago
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by dddddaviddddd 1 day ago
Comment by Jabrov 1 day ago
Comment by dzonga 1 day ago
encrypted cookies still work & they're stateless. & yeah you can pass cookies between servers & also server - S.P.A.
to BoBDaHacker - great research but slow down on the a.i writing.
Comment by aembleton 1 day ago
Comment by sairam_h 1 day ago
Comment by josefritzishere 21 hours ago
Comment by c0d3r__ 21 hours ago
Comment by jansan 1 day ago
Holy shit, Rickrolling is among the more harmless things you could have done with that.
Comment by Cider9986 1 day ago
Comment by curiousgal 1 day ago
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by rvz 1 day ago
If this is true, why help them if they do not take their own security seriously, especially if they have vibe-coded their auth backend server?
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by pjmlp 1 day ago
There is always some fun showing teams how easy it is to bypass with a plain browser and developer tools window open.
Comment by swader999 1 day ago
Comment by hackerdood 1 day ago
Comment by antonvs 1 day ago
Would you really want to work for one of the world’s most notoriously corrupt organizations?
Comment by BobDaHacker 1 day ago
Comment by antonvs 13 hours ago
Not saying "you should have heard of it", just giving info.
The US DOJ investigation found over $150 million in bribes and kickbacks over two decades. This led to dozens of criminal indictments, and ongoing legal battles over the recovery of stolen funds.
But maybe they've resolved that now and are a changed organization? Oh wait, this is the organization that made up a "peace prize" to give to a certain Donald Trump, to make up for the Nobel committee's completely inexplicable refusal to award their Peace Prize to the guy who started a pointless war with Iran that plunged the world into economic chaos. It'd be hilarious, if it weren't so sleazy, sad, and depressing.
Long story short, if FIFA offered you a cybersecurity job tomorrow, you should do a lot of due diligence before accepting.
Comment by rohitsriram 1 day ago
Comment by jadecarter68 1 day ago
Comment by assixx 1 day ago