China Deploys 30k-Ton Liaowang-1 "Floating Supercomputer" to Gulf of Oman

Posted by swed420 1 day ago

Counter41Comment19OpenOriginal

Comments

Comment by curt15 18 hours ago

This is obviously not about helping Iran, as the article tries to suggest, but rather to observe US assets and strategies in a live war, especially when lots of stealth aircraft are flying around without Luneberg lenses to mask their true radar signature.

Comment by awakeasleep 16 hours ago

I wonder if they also intend to have a role in providing evidence about who blows up the next grade schools, hospitals, and desalination plants

Comment by sinuhe69 1 day ago

Physical attacking such vessels is obviously not an option. But I wonder if directed targeted signal jamming and other electronic countermeasures could disrupt or at less severely affect such intelligence gathering. Intelligence gathering, specially signal intelligence is vital for future drone war, so I believe this question will become critical for everybody, regardless if they are pacifists or warmongers.

Comment by canxerian 22 hours ago

Why is your first reaction to attack it?

Comment by 17 hours ago

Comment by digitalPhonix 20 hours ago

I think they’re asking from the context of it being a military vessel being deployed to a relatively hot zone.

Comment by exabrial 1 day ago

Why not use a few cans of hardware store metallic glitter spray paint on the radomes? Seems a bit cheaper than blowing it up.

Comment by Drblessing 22 hours ago

> Physical attacking such vessels is obviously not an option.

Why not?

Comment by Ekaros 16 hours ago

That is an direct act of war against near peer level opponent. They can't just roll over. But must respond in kind and cause at least similar or larger damage. Say sinking a aircraft carrier or a few.

Comment by poulpy123 21 hours ago

Because china has the means to reply. It's one thing to bully countries that can't defend themselves like Venezuela, Cuba or Iran, it's another one to do the same with the factory of the world

Comment by metalman 4 hours ago

It could backfire in a way that ends American actions like the one the Chinese have pulled there ballistic missled arm chair up to watch the action more closely. The recent embarasment of european tech by chinese tech in pakistan india scuffle, is a hint at what are otherwise unknown Chinese missle capabilities, ie the two OTHER ships in the flotilla, there will of course be many oilers , tenders, and whatnot joining up, complicating things further. Plus given that China got this hardware on site in 10 days, is a message all it's own.

Comment by 4gotunameagain 22 hours ago

Ehm, geez, I don't know.. World war three ?

Israel is doing whatever it takes to start it, we must resist.

Comment by bix6 1 day ago

Is that a telescope in the middle of the ship? It looks like the covering I see at observatories.

Comment by estimator7292 12 hours ago

Yeah, looks like an optical observatory. Probably not astronomical telescopes, the water isn't stable enough for observing space. Most likely they're low power optical telescopes for tracking aircraft.

Comment by VegaKH 23 hours ago

This is a long article that could be a paragraph instead and lose nothing.

Comment by Lapsa 13 hours ago

since when supercomputers are measured in kilotons?

Comment by swed420 1 day ago

PLAN Intelligence Ship Now Watching U.S.–Israel–Iran War From 6,000km Sensor Bubble

Comment by aaron695 22 hours ago

[dead]

Comment by gotwaz 1 day ago

Waste of time and energy. People forget how much activity happened in that area over 20 years during the Iraq/Afghanistan fiasco that didnt achieve anything. Same story will repeat because the chimp troupe cant handle that level of complexity no matter what toys they have. So its like spending time collecting data on ants, that have learnt to speak and have declared they are going to control the weather. There are better things to waste a life and career on.

Comment by dosssman 1 day ago

"Greatness cannot be planned" - K. Stanley

Technology, methods and people at the time are bound to have been different, even if only slightly so.

Throughout history, many things were thought of as wasteful and looked over, until some people serendipitously spent time and energy and found some diamond in the dirt.

Comment by gsf_emergency_7 20 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Stanley#:~:text=lead%2...

What would you say the %time that "research science managers" spend looking in/for the "dirt" should be? 100? 50? 20? 37?