Bluesky CEO Jay Graber is stepping down
Posted by minimaxir 1 day ago
https://www.wired.com/story/bluesky-ceo-jay-graber-is-steppi... (https://web.archive.org/web/20260309191134/https://www.wired...)
https://toni.org/2026/03/09/coming-off-the-bench-for-bluesky...
Comments
Comment by arcalinea 23 hours ago
Comment by vincnetas 12 hours ago
Any confirmation? Comments?
Comment by popalchemist 11 hours ago
Comment by egorfine 10 hours ago
Comment by sbinnee 18 hours ago
Can folks, including me, have hints what sorts of innovative features or changes we will see?
Comment by ChicagoDave 22 hours ago
One big innovation is to drag a large bank or Stripe on board to enable payments on the network.
Good luck!
Comment by brchr 16 hours ago
Comment by Dracophoenix 23 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 22 hours ago
Comment by big_toast 21 hours ago
The "Grok-based Transformer"[0] that uses P(click/dwell/not_interested/photo_expand/video_view) seems pretty important and I can't tell how atproto is capturing it. I use @spacecowboy17.bsky.social's For You and from what I understand that feed wouldn't get that data?
[0]:https://github.com/xai-org/x-algorithm?tab=readme-ov-file#sc... (this isn't an endorsement of grok/x, it's more that the transformer recommender has been very steerable via those signals in my experience)
(I also struggle with the omni-purpose likes - endorsement, approval, discover-algorithm-input. Maybe a more prominent more/less button addresses this, but then provides less network signal.)
Comment by johnecheck 15 hours ago
Comment by big_toast 15 hours ago
I really liked when bsky introduced the 'show more/less' and then expanded it to custom feeds. But I'm afraid the recommender systems work better with more data. And I think the feed operator alone gets sent a limited set of interactions?
I'm not exactly sure how it would work in atproto but I could imagine an enriched 'graph-interactivity' where you can turn on and off which/how much signal/privacy you want.
Comment by CactusBlue 23 hours ago
Comment by parl_match 23 hours ago
could you provide some examples? i didn't really see this, but maybe i just missed it
Comment by CactusBlue 23 hours ago
Comment by parl_match 22 hours ago
Although, I guess that is the audience bluesky was targeting when they first started. So I guess I understand the criticism.
Also, it is a very ironic demonstration of the pancakes/waffles meme. Interjecting into an unrelated topic to ask the mods to ban someone you don't like is a tradition as old as dial up BBS. So I'm glad to see the torch is being carried forward to a younger generation.
Comment by CactusBlue 22 hours ago
Comment by easterncalculus 21 hours ago
It's a CEO's personal account. CEOs do this on Twitter all the time without it becoming a techcrunch article.
Let's just be honest about what happened - the CEO of Bluesky gave a (still not proportionally as) absurd response to an extremely absurd harassment campaign. That's what this and the article intentionally obscure.
Again, this is never how the web was supposed to work, and it (BARELY) holding on to that is the real story.
Comment by parl_match 22 hours ago
Doing the pancakes/waffles thing in the thread about pancakes/waffles is so fucking on the nose and demonstrates a complete lack of self awareness.
> They could have just reiterated their rules and left it at that; instead, they chose to mock their userbase, write them off as harassment, and banned users left and right, abusing their position in network to censor people at every layer of the protocol.
The more I dig into it, the more your one-sided whinging falls apart. I agree they could have handled it somewhat better, but I have very little sympathy for the terminally online bullshit that I'm seeing coming from the banned users.
Anyways, I feel we're apart on this issue. Feel free to have the last word if you wish.
Comment by jrflowers 20 hours ago
Wait what do you think “the pancakes/waffles thing” refers to? You posted 2 hours ago that you had never heard of it.
I can see that how it could be confusing because there’s “the pancakes/waffles thing” where Jay wrote about about people complaining to the CEO when the moderation team doesn’t respond as being equivalent to that meme, and then there’s “the pancakes/waffles thing” where Jay started posting pictures of pancakes and waffles as some sort of… joke or dunk? I never quite got the 4D comedy chess there.
It doesn’t seem like anybody is “doing the pancakes/waffles thing” in either case. Nobody is asking Jay, as CEO, to ban anyone in the thread about Jay not being the CEO anymore. And I don’t think I’ve seen anyone ironically posting metahumor pictures of pancakes.
The term has become so overused that definition creep now means that it could mean “anything that might bother Jay” in this context.
Comment by parl_match 19 hours ago
Quote me where I said I've never heard of the pancake/waffles thing? Of course I've heard of it, it's been around for a decade or so.
> I can see that how it could be confusing because there’s “the pancakes/waffles thing” where Jay wrote about about people complaining to the CEO when the moderation team doesn’t respond as being equivalent to that meme, and then there’s “the pancakes/waffles thing” where Jay started posting pictures of pancakes and waffles as some sort of… joke or dunk? I never quite got the 4D comedy chess there. It doesn’t seem like anybody is “doing the pancakes/waffles thing” in either case. Nobody is asking Jay, as CEO, to ban anyone in the thread about Jay not being the CEO anymore. And I don’t think I’ve seen anyone ironically posting metahumor pictures of pancakes. The term has become so overused that definition creep now means that it could mean “anything that might bother Jay” in this context.
I want you to read this out loud, to yourself. Maybe you'll feel as insane as I did when I read it.
Comment by jrflowers 17 hours ago
Here is a link to your comment about not having seen it in the context of the discussion you are posting in. When people talk about the pancakes/waffle thing in this context they are not talking about a meme from several years before Bluesky existed but rather a specific event (which I have apparently failed to communicate to you).
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47314798
> I want you to read this out loud, to yourself. Maybe you'll feel as insane as I did when I read it.
That seems unnecessarily hostile, especially given I was responding to this comment of yours.
> Doing the pancakes/waffles thing in the thread about pancakes/waffles is so fucking on the nose and demonstrates a complete lack of self awareness.
I was talking about the topic of the thread, you seem kind of focused on swearing and insulting people. My bad, I hadn’t seen your other posts and did not realize how much this subject has flustered you.
Comment by parl_match 14 hours ago
That makes sense. The original meme was widespread and this is fairly niche.
> That seems unnecessarily hostile, especially given I was responding to this comment of yours.
No man, I really mean it. Maybe it's hostile, but also, people talking about this legitimately sound, I don't know... unhinged? Off? I am flustered, because of how ridiculous this all is to me. I'm serious.
Like, "the CEO of blue sky said waffles to me and it was a 4d comedy dunk!" or whatever. It's like a Ralph Wiggum quote. What the fuck?
So, I think this topic is at its end. But really, read aloud what you wrote. Seriously, try it, you might find it grounding.
Comment by jrflowers 13 hours ago
To put my point as simply as possible for someone that isn’t ‘terminally online’ and understands that ‘posting isn’t praxis’ but also uses those phrases unprompted: People have criticized Jay for getting Poster’s Madness because of a time when she, as an admin, appeared to respond to any criticism saying everybody else has Poster’s Madness.
Comment by inquirerGeneral 21 hours ago
Comment by Karrot_Kream 21 hours ago
I was in the invite only cohort of Bluesky users and I don't really think so. I think what happened is after the election a bunch of very online, political news addicted anti-Musk folks migrated to Bluesky and created the current culture. Even though I'm pretty sure most folks on the network shared pretty much the same politics, the culture on the network changed completely within a few days of this.
Comment by mossTechnician 22 hours ago
[0]: https://www.change.org/p/bluesky-must-enforce-its-community-...
Comment by Levitz 22 hours ago
"Jesse Singal has distributed private medical information on Bluesky without the consent of the patient" translates to publishing a quote from a patient included in a therapist's letter of support for hormones.
The problem in this situation is that the complaint itself as well as the whole drama surrounding the person is an exercise of harassment towards Singal. In this context, I don't think that saying "waffles" is out of order. I'm not sure of what else can be done about crybullying, since by its very nature innocent bystanders would be surely affected if action was taken against those complaining.
Comment by mossTechnician 21 hours ago
And to me, that sounds like a much more concrete example of someone being a bully.
Comment by Levitz 20 hours ago
Is this, quoted in the change.org, the relevant line?
The law was not broken, it is also fairly evident that the intention was not to "cause harm to others", nor has any harm has seemingly come upon the patient for this (it requires a huge stretch of imagination to think of a case in which it could)
Comment by zdragnar 21 hours ago
Comment by mossTechnician 20 hours ago
Comment by easterncalculus 18 hours ago
I'd love to see the limitations of this opinion you definitely hold honestly and without favor.
You started by posting a change.org petition that links to a deleted post - in other words an "appeal to petition" that has no evidence. Now you are suggesting there is another leak that was published (presumably not mentioned in this petition?) that also has no evidence. Where is the evidence?
Everything from an actual search engine request for these posts (which to be clear, are deleted) suggests that these are anonymized and public, and contain no identifying information.
Comment by naasking 20 hours ago
How is that relevant to BSky's terms of service? The information was public and did not identify the person.
> But even if not, Singal says the same leaker directly contacted him with a new leak, which he also published.
I notice that you didn't say whether this new leak was private information, or whether it was also already public knowledge, or whether it in any way identified a person.
Comment by mossTechnician 20 hours ago
The new leak was, according to journalist Jesse Singal himself, absolutely private information.
Comment by naasking 18 hours ago
Comment by mossTechnician 18 hours ago
But if you wish to sate personal curiosity, it is in his Substack, linked from the first link I posted, which was itself from the link posted by its GP.
Comment by naasking 6 hours ago
When the office of Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey began an investigation, [Reed] said she handed over the spreadsheet, after scrubbing out the personally identifying information that could spark HIPAA problems. She shared a copy of it with me as well — it contains 17 alleged detransitioners or desisters and 60 allegedly worrisome cases.
What's your problem with what happened exactly? Is it your position that your "private information" cannot be used, ever, to expose what some see as a medical scandal, even though it cannot identify you or in any way be associated with you? What does "private" even mean to you if sharing this dataset did not violate HIPAA?Comment by easterncalculus 21 hours ago
1. People want him banned for any and no reason, so this is a post-hoc justification. The same people (let's be real, likely including you) wanted Singal banned the second he made his account.
2. This change.org petition, despite proving how many uninformed people will blindly click agree on a petition, proves nothing about how Singal broke literally any rule anywhere, in law or on Bluesky.
Comment by tekla 21 hours ago
He pulled a quote from a publically available affidavit.
There was no identifying information whatsoever either.
Comment by parl_match 22 hours ago
Comment by jmcgough 21 hours ago
Comment by easterncalculus 21 hours ago
Comment by hitekker 1 hour ago
I respect the CEO for laughing at a melodramatic harassment campaign. The last thing those outrage addicts need is coddling & corporate babytalk.
Comment by CactusBlue 20 hours ago
Comment by rakovsky89 21 hours ago
Comment by yuestion 20 hours ago
What Bluesky should do now is focus on expanding their userbase away from this particular group of insufferables.
Comment by subscribed 16 hours ago
Comment by clitui 17 hours ago
Comment by marxisttemp 20 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 20 hours ago
Also, unlike ActivityPub, it's actually useful for building features that normal people expect from social apps — for example, algorithmic feeds and search, and a single interlinked world (rather than fragmented "servers").
Comment by bschmidt1 6 hours ago
Comment by CactusBlue 20 hours ago
Comment by CactusBlue 20 hours ago
Comment by yuestion 20 hours ago
What they should also do is redesign (or remove) the "nuclear block" feature. In its current state, it helps perpetuate a hostile and exclusionary atmosphere to new users, which isn't going to help Bluesky grow an active and diverse userbase.
Comment by jauntywundrkind 20 hours ago
You have to make hard product decisions about which user bases to serve.
Comment by CactusBlue 20 hours ago
Comment by pfraze 19 hours ago
Comment by jauntywundrkind 21 hours ago
I wrote this to a discord on the 7th:
> i know it's so obviously stupid, but i like that they are having fun with being online, even if it is at their users expense. and omg the users are so so awful to them, so much. again, it seems obviously bad to do, but i can't help but want them to keep at having fun online anyways.
That was in semi private. I'd de-enohazize the expense part seirously, I'd spin it a little differently now, emphasizing more the Douglas Adams nature of it all:
> In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot of people angry, and been widely regarded as a bad move.
But that is also not owning it either, and I think this is an ownable lesson in just being human too, in deciding whether online mediums are corporate, lawyer, marketing, and engineer checked reviewed approved and wise correct words, or whether there must be some permission to be ourselves online, and some expectations that people are only human, and we should be thankful they are sharing their human experiences with us or not. It's not just having fun: whether we can be ourselves online is in question. Whether that is socially allowed.
(And generally I haven't found the character of the team to be deeply off. They haven't been, in my view, going out of their way to create injury, but they have been sharing sides that people have never wanted to hear!)
I see how this has been a bad taste for some. And I don't want to belittle your feelings here at all. Yes being more correct would be the wise obvious choice. Ultimately though I think these team member's are more beholden to remaining human, having fun, enjoying themselves.
And to creating (to credit another soul in the discord) personal / compsable moderation & filter systems (not top down enforcement!) such that they can enjoy being a "main character" online (like it or not), even in the midst of strident focused directed continual hostility. Which is a capability atproto is truly uniquely without compare set up to support & enable.
Props to the team. Please keep posting. Sorry about humanity. Sorry to people who are upset and turned off by this. No one is perfect, we work with what we got, and our responses are human and our own and valid, whether they are the wisest sharpest most all correct choice or no. With the good willing souls, we work towards synthesis & understanding; hopefully all sides find that agreeable.
Comment by catapart 23 hours ago
Comment by stackghost 17 hours ago
It's my understanding that Toni was so uninterested in bsky that his account was inactive. What makes Toni the right person at the helm, even in the interim?
Comment by yuestion 20 hours ago
Comment by subscribed 16 hours ago
Comment by datahack 14 hours ago
It has a long way to go.
Comment by vetrom 13 hours ago
Comment by t0lo 18 hours ago
Comment by deaux 15 hours ago
Fair enough
> moved back to twitter
"The summer heat in Phoenix is extremely off putting, so I moved to Riyadh"
Comment by SecretDreams 17 hours ago
Comment by pcthrowaway 16 hours ago
Very surprised to hear this... the few times I've visited Twitter in the last year I've been met with a deluge of racist, homophobic, transphobic, and misogynistic comments. Like there's practically no moderation on there. People saying "Hitler was right the whole time" and shit like that.
I don't use Bluesky much either but I definitely wouldn't have considered it worse than Twitter
Comment by acjohnson55 15 hours ago
Comment by animal_spirits 16 hours ago
Comment by tinfoilhatter 15 hours ago
Edit: The people downvoting without commenting are exactly the type of people BlueSky attracts. They can't handle others having different opinions and need safe spaces carved out for them via moderation, but will willingly spout off their own opinions endlessly and complain about anyone that doesn't adopt their worldview.
Comment by pcthrowaway 9 hours ago
I wasn't touching on freedom of speech, just the relative quality of speech in both platforms.
As a centralized service operating in Canada and the EU though, I do believe Twitter is legally required to remove certain kinds of hate speech. The qualification for removal might be debatable (e.g. "the Austrian painter was right" is another thing people say which is a dogwhistle, but probably not explicit enough for companies to be compelled to remove it) but the requirement is there.
> but I'm sure you hold dear the right to say whatever you want, whether others agree with it or not
You know, reflecting back on my youth, I wish certain things I said (and might have posted on social media had it been so present) were immediately stricken from the record. Banning hate speech which incites violence against a minority group is a slippery slope, but I think it's for the better. At the same time, of course it can be abused, such as with the IHRA definition of antisemitism used in many jurisdictions, under which many valid criticisms of Israel would be deemed "antisemitic"
Comment by tinfoilhatter 5 hours ago
> Banning hate speech which incites violence against a minority group is a slippery slope, but I think it's for the better. At the same time, of course it can be abused, such as with the IHRA definition of antisemitism used in many jurisdictions, under which many valid criticisms of Israel would be deemed "antisemitic"
Anti-semitism definitely gets weaponized and while I don't agree with people that praise Hitler, I also don't pretend the history I learned about WWII and the persecution of Jewish people was objective truth either. It's important for me to remember who the people defining what is and is not hate speech are as well.
Comment by bschmidt1 6 hours ago
Comment by SmirkingRevenge 17 hours ago
Personally, I've found bsky has a far healthier culture than Twitter, even before Musk turned it into his own personal megaphone/therapist and neo-nazi safe-space (and I follow a lot of political accounts)
The lack of payouts for engaging posts and the robust blocking really does change the incentive structure over there. That twitter-style toxic engagement-bait type posting doesn't get rewarded as much.
There are some far-left groups there who are very toxic and will harass some people, but they are easy to block. Most of them seem to block people at the drop of a hat anyways, and so end up in their own isolated bubbles.
Comment by whattheheckheck 20 hours ago
Comment by smt88 18 hours ago
Comment by acjohnson55 15 hours ago
I personally believe it's because they replicated the same incentive structure as Twitter. Being provocative generates engagement, which gets you reach and creates the perception of relevance.
At first, people were just happy to be at an alternative to Elon Twitter. But good vibes only get you so far when the incentives point the other direction.
Comment by meowface 12 hours ago
Comment by etchalon 14 hours ago
Comment by yieldcrv 22 hours ago
Comment by sourcegrift 23 hours ago
Comment by brendoelfrendo 22 hours ago
Comment by marxisttemp 20 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 20 hours ago
Comparing ActivityPub with atproto is like pitting Email against Web. These are just differently shaped solutions to differently shaped problems.
Comment by KoftaBob 19 hours ago
ActivityPub is fine if you enjoy your identity being held hostage by whatever random server admin decides to keep the lights on. Want to move servers? Hope you're cool with losing your followers. Want real account portability? Too bad. Want scalable search and flexible moderation? Also too bad.
ATproto wasn't built to compete with Mastodon out of pettiness, it was built because ActivityPub fundamentally cannot accomplish the task that ATProto/Bluesky is aiming for: a decentralized social network that isn't a cumbersome pain in the ass to use.
Comment by tapoxi 14 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 6 hours ago
Mastodon is shaped like email so you have “servers” sending messages to each other.
Atproto is shaped more like RSS with aggregation. Everyone posts data to their hosting (which anyone could move at any time), and apps like Bluesky aggregate data from everyone’s hosting.
So a concept like “Bluesky server” is nonsensical. What you have is “atproto hosting” (which can be provided by Bluesky, by other communities, by other companies, or can be self-hosted — it’s all open source and you can even implement your own) and “Bluesky app” (of which there’s only one — but there are forks like Blacksky which fork the entire stack including the server). There also “other atproto apps” like https://leaflet.pub, https://tangled.org, etc, which have nothing to do with Bluesky.
Comment by mfru 11 hours ago
I know that for Twitter-brained people this is considered an anti-feature (and yes account mobility is an issue), but a PITA to use it really is not
Comment by safarimonkey 7 hours ago
Besides, people sometimes have fallings-out.
Comment by egorfine 23 hours ago
Comment by esskay 19 hours ago
Comment by egorfine 10 hours ago
I think they should resist as much as possible. Yes it was a legal requirement to gas the Jews and it was illegal to hide them.
Who do we cheer now? Those who abided to the law or those who broke it?
Comment by wolvoleo 19 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 19 hours ago
Comment by subscribed 16 hours ago
Comment by egorfine 10 hours ago
Comment by Klonoar 19 hours ago
Comment by morcus 6 hours ago
Comment by wolvoleo 17 hours ago
Comment by idiotsecant 19 hours ago
Comment by egorfine 10 hours ago
This makes me have zero respect for those who volunteer to go the extra mile in the implementation of repressive laws.
Comment by idiotsecant 7 hours ago
Comment by rps93 17 hours ago
Comment by pfraze 23 hours ago
I've met with Toni a couple of times and he seems really excellent. He was CEO of Automattic (Wordpress) from 2006 to 2014, and that means a fair amount of expertise making an open-source-first company work. He cares about an open internet and protocol, and seems very keen to drive the mission forward.
For a little extra assurance, atproto is hopefully quite close to establishing an IETF working group, and the DID PLC Directory is likewise close to establishing the independent entity. Our priorities for an open network are unchanged.
Comment by hinkley 22 hours ago
Some orgs will go through three, from founder, to growth, to sustaining.
Comment by tcbrah 16 hours ago
The tricky part with Bluesky is figuring out which phase they're even in. 40M signups sounds like growth phase, but the retention numbers tell a different story. They might need a sustaining CEO before they've actually finished growing, which is an awkward spot to be in.
Comment by arbglhcs0 20 hours ago
Comment by CactusBlue 22 hours ago
Comment by pfraze 22 hours ago
Comment by baliex 22 hours ago
Comment by CactusBlue 22 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 22 hours ago
I wrote more about how it works here if you're curious: https://overreacted.io/a-social-filesystem/
Comment by CactusBlue 22 hours ago
Comment by danabramov 22 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 22 hours ago
Comment by jeffbee 21 hours ago
Comment by jauntywundrkind 20 hours ago
How, in spite of having no data on what it would be like, people are so confident that leaving shared open connected mediums behind is the only way to go is such a mystery to me.
The radio station I'm on just played a modem tone, Mountain Chill Radio. But I was already gearing up to write what an amazing era this has been, how incredible a rise it has been that we can connect & talk, with so many people. My dialtone travels so much further & that is glorious. I have no idea, feel like I would have no chance to build a good private network for myself, that my life would stagnante and closed, if I had to build my networks myself in private, smuggling the light of my soul to others rather than being able to let it out.
I am happy to be online. I am proud of my "data", my voice, my app records. There's some less pleasant less shiny corners! But it is mad incredible that I get to do this live, that I get to have so many edges of connection and serendipity. People provide the most wild interesting comments and suggestions and topics, ongoingly. I benefit so much from them sharing their lives.
I spiritually believe deeply that we have our light to share with the universe. To turn your nose up at sharing, to renounce & see only evil, to let the Fear Uncertainty and Doubt, this spectre of the closed/bad/no-good controlling systems shape our thinking here is a pandora's box: I say you are shutting the door right as hope is finally trying to get out.
Comment by Hamuko 22 hours ago
Comment by multisport 23 hours ago
Comment by mjr00 23 hours ago
From an actual content perspective Bluesky is fine, but there's no investor who would take a look at the site's user statistics[0] and say "oh yeah things are going great." There needs to be drastic changes if investors hope to have any return on investment.
Comment by pron 22 hours ago
Comment by unselect5917 18 hours ago
I just checked https://apps.apple.com/us/iphone/charts/6009 and X (formerly twitter) is the #1 news app followed by substack, CrimeRadar Dispatch Audio, and coming in at 4th place is reddit.
So if twitter's dead, what does that make reddit, 3 spots behind it? Well, not dead, obviously. Pretending that twitter is gone or dead is just not rational behavior.
Comment by pron 16 hours ago
I'm not saying it's "fully dead", but it clearly lost the cultural relevance and impact it once had.
Comment by unselect5917 16 hours ago
Comment by pron 15 hours ago
BTW, on US iOS App Store, Claude today is way ahead of Chrome, Google Maps, YouTube, Gmail, TikTok, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Surely you don't think it means it's used by more people.
Comment by unselect5917 14 hours ago
>Also, why would it be "wishful thinking"?
Because you've Motte & Balley'd twice now, each time in the direction of downplaying X's success. Because X is objectively doing great. #1st place is objectively great.
>BTW, on US iOS App Store, Claude today is way ahead of Chrome, Google Maps, YouTube, Gmail, TikTok, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Surely you don't think it means it's used by more people.
Are any of those news apps? This is the third Mott & Bailey. Again in the direction of denigrating X with bad data. So first principles and neutral data sourcing cannot be the reason for the inaccuracies - I dare say lies. It's flailing at this point.
Comment by denkmoon 14 hours ago
Comment by unselect5917 10 hours ago
Comment by ghaff 22 hours ago
Comment by throw-the-towel 19 hours ago
Comment by alex1138 22 hours ago
Speaking personally, supposedly Twitter now (X) still has a bunch of censorship and I don't especially like Musk (but what he did was valuable, showing Jay Bhattacharya he'd be put on a trending blacklist) and the site is... well, I should be able to follow threads without having an account but they crippled it so much. It reminds me of Instagram, "log in to see any PUBLIC page"
Comment by guelo 15 hours ago
Comment by prohobo 10 hours ago
Comment by jauntywundrkind 19 hours ago
That's all been gone. The algorithm fav'ing paid blue check users massively made things worse from there.
Bluesky attempts to be better on all fronts here. Interesting apps/services are welcome, permissionless. There is no top down pro-facsism pro-racism pro-MAGA finger-on-the-dial algo-shaping.
Sure there's some who will just be burned out & not interested. But there's so many interesting structural safeguards & such a openness to play & creativity & tuning... I really encourage folks to give it a time. I would definitely hope that "bound to fail" is perhaps not a cast die, that, we tried something great once, it's gone, never again, is not how this works.
Comment by rcruzeiro 17 hours ago
I was a customer of a bank that treated me with nothing but contempt. Whenever I called the bank because of a problem, I would stay on the line forever to eventually talk to an unbothered representative. One day, instead of calling, I complained on twitter and tagged the bank. Half an hour later the bank apologised and fixed my problem.
Comment by cindyllm 19 hours ago
Comment by nailer 18 hours ago
Comment by chaosharmonic 18 hours ago
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/02/report-musk-had-...
Comment by nailer 16 hours ago
In addition your own article regarding debugging the reach issue doesn’t support your conspiracy theory about Musk boosting tweets for his own ego.
> “Twitter’s system has historically promoted tweets from users whose posts perform better to both followers and non-followers in the For You Tab; Musk’s tweets should have fit that model but showed up less only about half the time that some engineers thought they should, according to some internal estimates,” Platformer wrote.
Comment by ValentineC 21 hours ago
Comment by unselect5917 17 hours ago
Comment by ajam1507 16 hours ago
Don't be fooled into thinking you're getting a dose of unfiltered reality on X.
Comment by unselect5917 16 hours ago
It feeds you what you engage with, and it changes surprisingly quickly. It caught onto my ARC raiders interest almost instantly. I engaged with a Portuguese post once, and now I get wonderful translated posts in Spanish, French, and Arabic too.
>Don't be fooled into thinking you're getting a dose of unfiltered reality on X.
What evidence could you possibly have that I'm not? There's lots of "politically incorrect" things which is a symptom of low filtration. Besides, you can't have seen my feed. Completely baseless allegation. So what's the real reason for taking the anti-X stance?
Comment by ajam1507 13 hours ago
Politically incorrect things might be a symptom of low filtration on almost any other site, but not one run by Elon Musk. He has a clear agenda and is not shy about putting his finger on the scale at X. It's so blatant and well documented that it's almost hard to imagine you could be commenting in good faith.
Comment by unselect5917 13 hours ago
Why would that change anything? I've always found political incorrectness to be a symptom of free speech.
>but not one run by Elon Musk.
Why would that be any different? Same symptom. Same free speech as far as I can tell.
>He has a clear agenda
What's the agenda?
>is not shy about putting his finger on the scale at X.
What instances of him putting his finger on the scale do you have? He gets community noted hilariously often.
>It's so blatant
What makes it blatant?
>well documented
By people who clearly hate the man and have lost their ability to reason over it. Like the ones who lost the narrative control of twitter.
>it's almost hard to imagine you could be commenting in good faith.
Having different opinions than you isn't bad faith. I brought up that the censorship is better than before (but still not great), and mentioned some cool new developments I've seen. You've attempted to steer the conversation to be about Elon Musk or myself. These are both ad hominem attacks, which is textbook bad faith.
I think the lady doth protest too much.
Comment by pbiggar 10 hours ago
Comment by sunaookami 10 hours ago
Comment by unselect5917 10 hours ago
Comment by pron 20 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 22 hours ago
This also does not account for (1) people with multiple accounts (labellers, feeds, bots, intent) or actual activity (significant % are likely churned, didn't delete)
Comment by mjr00 21 hours ago
Again, this is not a reflection of anything bad about Bluesky as a user. IMO a smaller and more focused is a good thing for the actual community, hence why I read/post on HN and not Reddit or Twitter. However as an investor there's basically no way to interpret those statistics as anything but bad.
Comment by verdverm 21 hours ago
Comment by ajsalminen 9 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 2 hours ago
Comment by unselect5917 18 hours ago
From a content perspective nothing important is permitted to be discussed there. It's just another hivemind with the exact same opinions as reddit and HN. Completely pointless and nothing more than the output of a temper tantrum over not getting to be the censors in charge and the whole world knows it.
Comment by jsheard 23 hours ago
Comment by multisport 23 hours ago
Comment by marksomnian 23 hours ago
Comment by alterom 23 hours ago
Comment by jnwatson 20 hours ago
Comment by ribosometronome 23 hours ago
Comment by Legend2440 23 hours ago
Also the whole point of Bluesky is that they aren't supposed to be a big evil silicon valley tech company. But now you have a silicon-valley VC running the thing.
Comment by orphea 23 hours ago
Comment by rmccue 22 hours ago
Comment by bombcar 22 hours ago
Comment by qingcharles 20 hours ago
Comment by bananamogul 22 hours ago
Automattic's Matt Mullenweg is downright insane. Just google their war with WP Engine and by extension the entire WordPress community.
Comment by captainbland 23 hours ago
Comment by sieabahlpark 23 hours ago
Comment by RIMR 21 hours ago
Today, Bluesky remains largely undermoderated and they have managed to bake in more toxic features Twitter ever did in such a short timespan. Its success is largely driven by having a UI closer to Twitter's original UI than any other alternative, and taking a stronger stance against far-right rhetoric than Twitter.
The only technical saving grace is the broad control you can take over the algorithm to avoid the content you don't want to see, but Bluesky is generally covered with more calls for violence than their nascent content team could ever actually deal with.
And I have yet to actually see a real use of ATproto that isn't just immediately blown out of the water by ActivityPub.
But I digress, the new CEO pretty much hammers that final nail in the coffin for me. I have zero belief in Bluesky to be anything but another awful corporate corner of the web that I should avoid.
Comment by bdavisx 6 hours ago
Not arguing, just curious - what toxic features are you talking about?
Comment by reverius42 20 hours ago
These things are very valuable, and if Bluesky can't succeed doing them, I hope someone else can.
Comment by danabramov 6 hours ago
ActivityPub doesn’t remotely even try to solve problems solved by atproto. What are you talking about?
In short, atproto makes apps interoperable by default by decoupling data hosting from applications. This means that apps become projections of everyone’s data, and can embed and interpret typed data from each other. ActivityPub doesn’t offer anything close, which is why you don’t have projects like http://leaflet.pub, https://standard.site, https://tangled.org, https://semble.so in the AP ecosystem.
If you genuinely want to learn about atproto, I have two longreads for you:
Comment by isodev 16 hours ago
> As Bluesky matures, the company needs a seasoned operator focused on scaling and execution
Translation: enshittification
That’s the other shoe where they will iterate on ways to monetise the party. Ads, paid “verification”, making users pay to use atproto apps (or making developers pay to use the managed storage)… the sky is the limit.
In a way I’m happy Bluesky never took root and outside a few enthusiasts in my bubble it’s practically unknown.
Comment by Bnjoroge 22 hours ago
Comment by paxys 23 hours ago
Comment by plsft 23 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 23 hours ago
Which is to say, it provides a more robust model for your (true) information and data to be exploited by others than even the Twitter model.
The Mastodon-slash-email model that relies on individual servers is better because decentralization is safer -- Those models bear more genuine "ability to delete" and more "plausible deniability."
Comment by Zak 23 hours ago
The only reasonable understanding is that these protocols are for for publishing to the public. It is not possible to reliably retract anything published to thousands of other peoples' computers. We used to try to teach people that the internet is forever, and that's even more true with federated protocols. That doesn't make them a bad idea.
Comment by giancarlostoro 18 hours ago
The internet is forever, don't want it propagated? Don't post it.
> Well-behaved servers will honor delete requests, but the protocol doesn't mandate it.
Probably because they cannot truly guarantee or enforce it.
Comment by NoahZuniga 22 hours ago
Comment by Zak 22 hours ago
I understand why people want to be able to delete things from the internet, but it doesn't work that way. It has never worked that way. It can't work that way unless every computer is locked down to running remotely attested government-approved software, and that's obviously worse.
Comment by ghaff 22 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 22 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 18 hours ago
It was already wayyy too complex. And this? Yeah, they (you? sorry) really need to just give it up.
Comment by verdverm 4 hours ago
Permissioned / private data is non negotiable for any social media tech trying to gain mass adoption.
Comment by jrm4 3 hours ago
The entire point of services like Bluesky and Twitter is broadcasting your activity out to the internet for anyone to see (which of, course, is technically little-or-no different from "grab")
Comment by verdverm 2 hours ago
You seem rather confused. I do not work for Bluesky. I am an independent developer building completely separate applications on ATProto.
Comment by jrm4 22 hours ago
Or more precisely, it might. We now have a better idea of how people actually behave and it's not in accordance with "the internet is forever," and I have no interest in blaming them for 'human nature' in that way.
And it's all still dangerous. Again, I know the internet is forever, but someone else posting about ME might not.
This isn't an individual thing. It's "ecological."
And I have no interest in making Big Brother THAT MUCH EASIER to build.
Comment by Zak 19 hours ago
It does seem like fewer people are posting personal content that way lately. Perhaps most people are better off sharing things one to one, or in small groups that are meant to stay private. That doesn't make it bad for the more public formats to exist; they're just not for everyone.
Comment by RIMR 21 hours ago
Comment by lukev 23 hours ago
Don't use it if you don't like it. Some of us like the strong identity and content verification.
Comment by jrm4 22 hours ago
Proverbial Big Brother ALSO likes "strong identity and content verification."
Comment by lukev 2 hours ago
Comment by fritzo 23 hours ago
Comment by lukev 23 hours ago
Comment by PaulHoule 22 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 22 hours ago
Except that the design of Bluesky severely increases the possibility of your data getting out of your control. And I can hear the immediate responses of "oh if you didn't want it public, don't post it," but as should be frightfully obvious -- not everyone thinks like that.
Comment by tensor 17 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 3 hours ago
That doesn't mean that there is no danger of people having "buyer's" regret later, or more importantly that there are issues beyond the individuals.
Comment by ajsalminen 22 hours ago
Comment by ghaff 23 hours ago
Comment by lich_king 23 hours ago
Comment by rekmarks 22 hours ago
Comment by lich_king 22 hours ago
This is also visible in your stats if you extend the time window. They had a peak in 2024 and are pretty much declining month to month ever since.
Comment by haunter 22 hours ago
Comment by PaulHoule 22 hours ago
Comment by ajsalminen 21 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 21 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 22 hours ago
Comment by rekmarks 13 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 2 hours ago
Comment by ghaff 22 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 21 hours ago
Comment by rakovsky89 21 hours ago
Comment by ghaff 19 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 22 hours ago
Comment by fritzo 21 hours ago
twitter/x/bluesky - a big tech company owns your data
mastodon - a grassroots community organization owns your data
zulip - someone you've met personally owns the data
your blog - you own the data
(and yes these are a bit of a category error, but to achieve privacy maybe we should broaden the category and sacrifice reach)
Comment by jrm4 18 hours ago
Because you have "possesses" (which can be anyone) vs. "controls?"
Twitter - single point of big company external control
Mastodon - One or multiple unverifiable fallible likely grassroots, points of external control
Bluesky - Once out, merely the illusion of control, because your data is out there, verifiable?.
Comment by alterom 23 hours ago
The entire point of a platform like Twitter / Bluesky is reach, not privacy.
Posts and discussions there are meant to be public, and highly visible.
It's not that people don't care. It's that this is not what the platform is for.
What's important for a platform like that is not even anonymity, but functional pseudonymity.
And that thing is on its way to the effectively outlawed with the push for "age verification".
People do notice it and leave [1], but at some point, there might be no place to go to.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1rmlzhy/welp_goodb...
Comment by jrm4 22 hours ago
But no, we're way past "if you don't want it public don't post it." and then wiping our hands and being done. We need to think in a policy kind of way on this.
And again, things are already dangerous -- but ATProto makes them more dangerous. It's something like a chain-of-custody thing. I think the world is collectively safer where the gathering of data like this is less reliable and less verifiable.
ATProto's model makes the building of the proverbial evil Big Brother panopticon thing a LOT easier.
Comment by archagon 23 hours ago
Comment by muyuu 18 hours ago
there is just no way to police what happens to data that is broadcast, which doesn't remove control away from the reader
it's annoying because in the abstract it's something everybody has the potential to need and need badly, but if you're afraid to put something out there to your name/pseudonym you really shouldn't
Comment by AlienRobot 21 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 18 hours ago
Comment by johnecheck 15 hours ago
Comment by jrm4 3 hours ago
Comment by AJRF 23 hours ago
Now I am down to file sharing, email and functions related to my job, a little youtube - but trying to ween myself of that. The internet as I knew it is dead.
Comment by somedude895 13 hours ago
Comment by haunter 23 hours ago
Comment by ChicagoDave 22 hours ago
https://jobs.gem.com/bluesky/am9icG9zdDqRK9D8osOaeyyESJ7cPsX...
Job opening to build sports relationships.
Comment by rorylawless 20 hours ago
Comment by qingcharles 20 hours ago
Comment by Aboutplants 23 hours ago
Comment by haunter 22 hours ago
It's a "people problem" not a technical one. For example if you are following anything from Asia, or just generally from Japan and Korea you will most likely see it on Twitter, there was never a big exodus of users there. Bsky has almost 0 engagement. Just watching WBC this week and I wanted to see korean highlights of their games. They are all over on Twitter, nothing on Bsky.
Comment by tlogan 19 hours ago
Comment by nomilk 20 hours ago
Comment by t0lo 18 hours ago
Comment by small_model 23 hours ago
Comment by jeromegv 22 hours ago
Comment by dutchCourage 22 hours ago
It is not a place that is trying to showcase diverse opinions in an unbiased way.
Comment by archagon 23 hours ago
Comment by small_model 20 hours ago
Comment by archagon 19 hours ago
[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/12/elon-musk...
Comment by small_model 19 hours ago
Comment by DiabloD3 23 hours ago
Comment by embedding-shape 23 hours ago
Comment by lich_king 23 hours ago
Mastodon ended up losing its user base to Bluesky during the early Twitter exodus because many influencers and journalists wanted to have an "elite" status and a special relationship with the platform, so they preferred a platform owned by Dorsey to some hippie open-source thing. Bluesky, in turn, ended up losing back to Twitter/X when it turned out to be a place where you mostly talk about how awful Twitter/X is.
I want to say that we don't need social networks where we constantly interact with hundreds of thousands of strangers, but I'm writing this on HN, so...
Comment by dv35z 22 hours ago
I believe, due to the format of engagement, its easy to spend a lot of time there scrolling - so consider
(1) only using the platform on your desktop computer, instead of phone,
(2) limiting time - 25 minutes a day is enough!
(3) Mute spammers, complainers, people with negative attiudes - you can't catch them all, but you can intentionally shape your experience over time.
(4) Subscribe to tags of your passions (example: #piano, #makerspace, #drawing, #cats, #jujitsu, #cncrouter, #3dprinting), and try to lean into that instead of getting caught up in endless political reactions - which never ends. You can be intentional, and subscribe to people who have a positive vision for the version of the future you prefer.
Comment by username223 15 hours ago
Same, more or less. Twitter started as a place to be interrupted by attention-seekers, and Bluesky was just "that but with less Elon Musk and more implementation throat-clearing." I never saw the point. Mastodon feels more like old-school Usenet, where you could find communities with shared interests, block the attention-seekers, and shrug at the usual human drama.
Comment by carefree-bob 21 hours ago
I certainly don't need a billion users. I think I'd be happy with 100,000 users -- what is your number?
I think this is related to the question of how big of a city do you need to live in before you can find something to do and are not bored living there. I'm fine with a city of, say, 50,000-100,000. That is more than sufficient for me to find an appropriate number of likeminded friends and neighbors as well as interesting pursuits.
Comment by lich_king 21 hours ago
I don't think that's a meaningful parameter to think about? I'd say that on any social network, I have meaningful, ongoing relationship with maybe 20 people. I suspect that's the norm. But that doesn't mean you can join a social network with 20 users and get that. I mean, if it's a mailing list for friends and family, sure. But not if it's 20 randomly-selected strangers from around the world.
So the critical mass to make the "random stranger" type of a social network work is much, much higher than the number of daily interactions you need to keep coming back.
Comment by carefree-bob 21 hours ago
By the way, if your number is not the same as mine, I am not intimating that this makes you deficient in some way. Everyone has their own number.
Comment by wolvoleo 17 hours ago
Some people call that bubbles, I call it sanity. I try not to spend my time giving out about the other side though. It just gives me negative energy.
Comment by BeetleB 21 hours ago
Bluesky and Mastodon users can interact with each other (provided both parties opt in). I'm on Mastodon, but I see my friend's messages (he's on BlueSky) and vice versa. My replies show on up on BlueSky and vice versa.
Comment by JoshTriplett 19 hours ago
Comment by BeetleB 16 hours ago
It works. It has poor documentation, though so it took a few attempts to figure it out.
For example if you don't have a profile image it won't work.
Comment by JoshTriplett 16 hours ago
Comment by BeetleB 4 hours ago
It's been a year so my memory is fuzzy.
You can only follow folks who have also set up the bridge on the other side.
Comment by brightball 17 hours ago
Mastodon has been great for tech communities in my experience though.
Comment by PaulHoule 22 hours ago
I don’t see why it is “zero” sum, nothing stops you from posting to more than one social. I mean, I have relatives on Facebook and no prospect for getting them to change so I cut-n-paste what I posted on Mastodon to Facebook, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Tumblr, and all sorts of places.
Comment by ascorbic 21 hours ago
Comment by ajsalminen 21 hours ago
Comment by dbbk 21 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
Comment by rvz 23 hours ago
Threads being the biggest Mastodon instance and federating with mastodon.social (Meta signed contracts with instance maintainers to do so) and the other 3 largest instances (Pawoo, baragg (d_o_t) net, and mstdn (d-o-t) jp) taking up more that >70% of the total users using it?
That doesn't sound good.
The CEO sold all of us out and was the only one that made real money on Mastodon.
Comment by jeromegv 22 hours ago
Comment by rvz 20 hours ago
Here on Earth, Europe, Germany, Berlin, Mastodon GmbH.
So he didn't tell you that he got a €1M one-off payment from Mastodon? [0]
> You are making things up.
It is true. [0]
[0] https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/18/mastodon-ceo-steps-down-as...
Comment by BeetleB 21 hours ago
I just went to my feed (only people I follow), and although mastodon.social showed up a few times, the majority of users I interact with are on distinct servers. So out of 20 people, I see 17 different servers.
My feed will not be impacted much if mastodon.social dies.
Comment by alexose 20 hours ago
Comment by ddtaylor 19 hours ago
Comment by partiallypro 19 hours ago
Comment by tensor 17 hours ago
Comment by UberFly 14 hours ago
Comment by throw_m239339 5 hours ago
Comment by reducesuffering 13 hours ago
Comment by pmdr 4 hours ago
Comment by amadeuspagel 23 hours ago
How could a social network, or anything humans create, not be values-driven?
Comment by rchaud 23 hours ago
Comment by zachlatta 19 hours ago
The internet has a tendency to penalize people who try to do bold things. As a result, it’s too often strategic to stay quiet and boring and focus on the bottom line.
We shouldn’t be cynical. We should be excited when people say bold things and reward them when they live up to it.
Comment by paxys 23 hours ago
Comment by _heimdall 23 hours ago
Comment by plufz 23 hours ago
Comment by Zigurd 23 hours ago
Comment by mcdonje 23 hours ago
Comment by jakelazaroff 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
Comment by irishcoffee 22 hours ago
Allow me introduce you to the inception of enshittification
Comment by jakelazaroff 21 hours ago
Comment by irishcoffee 27 minutes ago
Comment by relaxing 23 hours ago
It’s sort of like that.
Comment by Ekaros 23 hours ago
Comment by AuthAuth 23 hours ago
Comment by asmor 23 hours ago
Comment by asadotzler 16 hours ago
Comment by dbbk 23 hours ago
Comment by AuthAuth 20 hours ago
Comment by asadotzler 16 hours ago
B Corps allow the board to weigh things besides shareholder value. That's a meaningful distinction.
The idea is that shareholder primacy isn't compatible with everything every corporation wants to do, so having a board that's protected from lawsuits when they put things above shareholders is a useful thing and B Corps offer that.
The board can, for example, reject a "superior" takeover bid without fear of lawsuits from shareholders pissed off they didn't get the biggest payday available. A typical C Corp's board MUST take the highest offer, and not doing so WILL get them sued. That means if GoodGuy B Corp is about to be taken over by BadGuy Inc., the GoodGuy board can say "No, they're not compatible with the public benefit mission we incorporated under so we're not going to accept their offer." That's actually really useful.
Comment by AuthAuth 22 minutes ago
Comment by MarsIronPI 23 hours ago
Comment by SideburnsOfDoom 23 hours ago
Comment by snapetom 23 hours ago
Comment by simonw 22 hours ago
The term they use for this is "credible exit" - designing the entire protocol such that if the company itself misbehaves the affected users can leave to a separate instance without losing their relationships or data.
Comment by SideburnsOfDoom 23 hours ago
It has been a "rallying cry" but it doesn't stand up to much scrutiny of how Bluesky actually functions: an "open protocol" with one central server means little. Maybe this will change at some point in the future, and maybe it is changing, see https://blacksky.community/ . But this is not the same as Mastodon, where it's been that way for a while.
Comment by muppetman 23 hours ago
Comment by taurath 23 hours ago
Comment by ElijahLynn 20 hours ago
Comment by ChrisArchitect 23 hours ago
Comment by 12_throw_away 23 hours ago
> I’ve been a partner at True Ventures for many years
Comment by rvz 23 hours ago
This 'growth' comes with a lot of negative things and rarely lots of good things.
Comment by volkercraig 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
This is separate from ATProto, which I still maintain positive sentiment for.
Comment by zoul 15 hours ago
Comment by nout 22 hours ago
Comment by muyuu 17 hours ago
Comment by TyrunDemeg101 23 hours ago
Comment by dannyfritz07 17 hours ago
Comment by davidw 23 hours ago
Comment by pfraze 23 hours ago
Comment by davidw 23 hours ago
That said, I have genuinely been enjoying Blue Sky. It has 'enough' for me. There are a bunch of YIMBYs and urbanists. The mayor of my city and one of my city councilors are there. There is starting to be a bike racing community. There are some good local journalists.
I read your other comment; I hope your optimism is warranted.
Comment by pfraze 23 hours ago
Comment by humannutsack 5 hours ago
God damn what a miserable place you fuckheads turned tech into!
In case it's not clear YOU FAILED you hard-headed idiot. No amount of brown-nosing is going to save your ass you overly-political fucking loser.
Comment by dannyfritz07 17 hours ago
Comment by ynniv 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
Comment by AirMax98 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
The more interesting perspective is a Plug-n-Play Distributed System [2]
[1] https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/compare/main...ver...
[2] https://atproto.com/articles/atproto-for-distsys-engineers
Comment by guywithahat 21 hours ago
Comment by KingMob 13 hours ago
Comment by ChrisArchitect 21 hours ago
Comment by Devasta 22 hours ago
The intended audience was meant to be blockchain weirdos with encyclopedic knowledge of the age of consent in every state, but instead they are stuck with a core userbase of Furries and LGBT people.
They don't know how to fix this, so they'll be stuck floundering for a while to come trying and failing to return to their core mission.
Comment by tryrrr 22 hours ago
Comment by Kye 23 hours ago
Comment by x0x0 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
Comment by alephnerd 23 hours ago
Learning how to build a board that is in your favor, making alliances with less than pure players if needed, and being ruthlessly competitive allows an ideal to become reality.
Comment by pfraze 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
I have concerns about one piece of messaging I've seen lately, working on a writeup, stay tuned
Comment by spacechild1 23 hours ago
Comment by alephnerd 23 hours ago
Comment by dzhiurgis 20 hours ago
Comment by user3939382 22 hours ago
Comment by tryrrr 22 hours ago
Comment by rvz 23 hours ago
The interim CEO doesn't even use Bluesky himself, so at this point you might as well move to Threads.
Comment by qcoret 23 hours ago
Comment by Lammy 23 hours ago
Comment by verdverm 23 hours ago
https://pdsls.dev/at://did:plc:cwf4mmm7mpzistinx3ox2zhj#coll...
Comment by rvz 23 hours ago
13 of them are reposts, and 2 of them are his own actual posts and then made 2 more posts about becoming the interim CEO of Bluesky and then "thanking" Jay.
That doesn't seem like he even uses it regularly only up until the leadership changes.
Comment by baggachipz 23 hours ago
Comment by PaulHoule 21 hours ago
Comment by tryrrr 22 hours ago
Comment by nout 22 hours ago
Comment by wolvoleo 17 hours ago
Comment by huflungdung 11 hours ago
Comment by arbglhcs0 20 hours ago
Comment by rakovsky89 23 hours ago
Comment by gethly 22 hours ago
Comment by pipeline_peak 23 hours ago
Comment by monster_truck 23 hours ago
Comment by monster_truck 19 hours ago
This account has posted once and has over 700 followers in like an hour, which looks like this: https://i.imgur.com/hQcKDZQ.png
There are countless "patriot" "true blue" "blue heart emoji american flag emoji" accounts just like this
Comment by AbstractH24 23 hours ago
Let’s not forget Jack Dorsey laid off half of Cash the other week
Comment by fredgrott 22 hours ago
for example name the only Twitter investment that made money....
hint...Bluesky.....all other Twitter projects failed.