U.S. Formally Withdraws from World Health Organization
Posted by reaperducer 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by lateforwork 1 day ago
Comment by pfisherman 1 day ago
But who knows, maybe if we keep the tariffs for another 10 years we can host the chemical manufacturing facilities that produce the drugs their biotechs sell to us after ours are no longer competitive.
Comment by _DeadFred_ 1 day ago
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/...
Comment by pseudohadamard 15 hours ago
Comment by Nursie 1 day ago
Sad all round.
(Edit - downvoters, do you not agree that this is likely, or do you think that it's OK?
If the former, it's been done before so it seems very likely to me. If the latter then I have to say I agree with this take in scientific american - "To include TCM in the ICD is an egregious lapse in evidence-based thinking and practice."
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-world-health-...)
Comment by speff 1 day ago
Comment by pseudohadamard 15 hours ago
Comment by Nursie 12 hours ago
I consider that quite evil as it’s not evidence based and undermines actually good, useful medicine. Just as I would/do consider anyone trying to increase take up of homeopathy in poorer parts of the world to be evil.
In the case of China and TCM there appear to be nationalist and financial motives.
Comment by mapotofu 1 day ago
Comment by Nursie 19 hours ago
“A isn’t perfect therefore I choose to believe in B.”
Where A is an evidence-based discipline with some shortcomings and B is unevidenced woo. I’d rather something that works and can be proven to work over a good narrative, myself.
Several of your criticisms there also only apply to the American way of running a health system, that’s a choice that’s not taken everywhere.
Comment by platinumrad 1 day ago
Edit: It's dumber and worse than I thought.
Comment by Nursie 1 day ago
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-world-health-...
Comment by platinumrad 1 day ago
Comment by Nursie 1 day ago
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/11/10/chinese-traditiona...
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3326972/ho...
https://rhinos.org/tough-issues/promotion-of-traditional-chi...
It actually is like they're sending TCM doctors to Africa!
I had no idea...
Comment by platinumrad 1 day ago
Comment by Nursie 1 day ago
No doubt ingredient sourcing is in the mix too.
Comment by pfisherman 1 day ago
Comment by wuschel 1 day ago
China is not only a strong player in biotech. Their capability in chemical R&D and market transfer is very strong, too both in small and industrial scale. And let’s not speak about electronics …
Comment by Nursie 20 hours ago
But there is evidence from all around the world that the Chinese government is actively pushing TCM, that they push it with the WHO, and that they are actively trying to open up markets for TCM “pharmaceuticals” and practice in African and other nations.
I put links in some of the sibling comments showing this.
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
Comment by Nursie 1 day ago
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-world-health-...
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
It just seems like such an undermining move to prop up an industry that anyways relies on distrust of established scientific and medical systems
Comment by SanjayMehta 1 day ago
2. Even if they didn't push it, the west has been stealing ("appropriating" in liberal speak) Ayurvedic remedies for years. Take turmeric for example. The GoI had to sue to keep turmeric patent free.
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
2. Ayurvedic and TCM largely refers to those things which haven't undergone clinical trials to understand their efficacy as prescribed medicines. Anything from that sphere which is clinically proven to work and is dispensed as prescription medicine just becomes part of medicine. It's not about "stealing" or whatever, it's about whether people should be given proven effective medicines or hopefully effective medicines, the former being what we should promote globally
Comment by disgruntledphd2 1 day ago
Interestingly enough, RCTs of acupuncture (with sham needles) show pretty large effect sizes for many treatments but only in China, which is super weird. The most likely explanation is that the blinding doesn't work (which is a perennial problem in basically all RCTs), but it's interesting nonetheless.
Comment by lateforwork 1 day ago
Keep in mind that the Western system is not perfect either. Many good natural medicines are ignored by western countries because they have not undergone clinical trials. Why haven't they undergone clinical trials? Because that takes large amounts of money and no one is going to make that investment unless they can patent the molecule.
Of course, natural medicines that have been in use for hundreds if not thousands of years are not patentable, so no one will do a clinical trial for them. As a result, when you go to a doctor in a western country they are completely ignorant about natural medicines and will only prescribe drugs pushed by big pharma.
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
The Ramdevs and Patanjalis of the world could easily afford to do this and would boost their sales 100x if they could. They already sell unpatentable remedies and powders with great profit (but decamp to Western hospitals when they are actually sick)
Comment by lateforwork 1 day ago
Comment by Nursie 16 hours ago
Doctors test for deficiencies in vitamins and minerals and recommend cheap effective supplements to address them and other conditions all the frickin time.
My partner is currently taking completely unpatentable iron supplements for a deficiency and I am taking cheap, unpatentable psyllium husk for gut health and cholesterol management, both on the advice of our (Western, evidence-based) doctors.
This meme that ‘western’ doctors are only interested in peddling expensive pharmaceuticals and don’t look ‘holistically’ at patient health, or recommend cheap, effective treatments … it’s just not true at all.
Comment by lateforwork 10 hours ago
Comment by Nursie 9 hours ago
Magnesium blood tests exist - https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/amp/article/magnesium-blood-...
Naturopathic ‘doctors’ have jobs because the credulous believe they’re something other than quacks. Naturopathy is a grab bag of unproven, alt-med bullshit and should be regarded as nothing more than charlatanry.
Your view of western medicine is nonsense driven by antipathy. Yes, there are problems with money from big Pharma corrupting the system. That doesn’t mean any of the woo-woo alt systems are any more real. They’re all far worse because they don’t even start with an evidence base.
Comment by lateforwork 8 hours ago
The same could be said about your view of natural and traditional medicine.
> ‘Western’ doctors generally recommend things that work and are proven to work.
That's true of traditional medicine as well. The difference is how they are proven. Western medicines prove using a double blind study. It is expensive and you can't get funding for such studies unless an investor is assured of returns for their investment, which is only possible for novel, patentable medicines. And that means many natural medicines that work are ignored by the Western system. Traditional medicine on the other hand prove that something works not using double blind studies but 100s years of actual experience.
An example is magnesium. Doctors don't know that it works for muscle tightness and insomnia because no one has done a double blind study on it with thousands of patients. And nobody will because magnesium is not patentable. And so they prescribe Ambien CR, a very harmful and addictive drug. It is a very broken system, and you don't seem to want to acknowledge those limitations. (And no, no reliable tests exist for magnesium deficiency but that's a side point.)
> Naturopathy is a grab bag of unproven, alt-med bullshit and should be regarded as nothing more than charlatanry.
Yeah.. this attitude is the problem.
> They’re all far worse because they don’t even start with an evidence base.
They do, perhaps not in a way that satisfies you, but they do. The evidence is based on 100s of years of experience.
Comment by SanjayMehta 1 day ago
Comment by FridayoLeary 1 day ago
Comment by garte 1 day ago
Comment by tokioyoyo 1 day ago
Sure, I don’t agree with lots of their stuff, but I’d rather a guy who doesn’t flip flop his mind every 4 years.
Comment by ks2048 1 day ago
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
Comment by pstuart 1 day ago
It's a daily challenge to keep track and not spiral into despair. It's not just that one man, it's that so many citizens love him. It truly boggles the mind.
Comment by ethbr1 1 day ago
The US might have had a president who was knowledgeable about technology and dedicated to solving climate change.
Who might have chosen differently about invading Afghanistan and Iraq.
I'm sure Gore would have made mistakes, but it's hard to see a path where he wasn't a better president (for the US and for the world) than W Bush.
Comment by stockresearcher 1 day ago
might have had? Ha, you should read up a bit on Jimmy Carter.
> A generation from now this solar heater can either be a curiosity, a museum piece, an example of a road not taken, or it can be just a small part of one of the greatest and most exciting adventures ever undertaken by the American people.
That was him when he put solar panels on the roof of the White House, which Ronnie Ray-Gun removed and sent to a museum.
Comment by ethbr1 1 day ago
Comment by myrmidon 1 day ago
I also blame the republicans for turning elections more and more into polarized shit slinging personalized attacks instead of policy based arguments, and I'd argue that this really took off in the Clinton era, and then got really bad under Obama/Trump.
Comment by pstuart 1 day ago
Comment by boogieknite 1 day ago
Comment by pstuart 1 day ago
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/29/uselections200...
Comment by ethbr1 1 day ago
See: Trump
Comment by wizzwizz4 8 hours ago
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
Comment by istjohn 1 day ago
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
Comment by pstuart 1 day ago
The big question is how far until we bottom out, and what does "recovery" look like. The fact that the political divide has grown so that realities do not converge is rather terrifying.
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by xethos 1 day ago
> we’re tired of funding the world’s defense
Reads like "The outrageously high R&D costs of modern weapons systems are being subsidized across many customers. This must end immediately!"
What other business wants fewer customers to spread R&D across, or less revenue from fewer units sold?
Are we instead discussing how much the US spends internally on defence, then exports the largest military in the world to protect the country and her interests? Because not only is that an example of America choosing to spend her own money instead of being coerced by other nations, but the guy that just ran a snatch'n'grab on a foreign leader was enabled by that same policy. Forgive my disbelief that he'll dismantle that system any time soon.
Comment by myrmidon 1 day ago
Regarding defense: The US is not the world policeman and never really has been. Police enforces higher laws-- but the only law the US enforces is its own, which sometimes becomes very obvious (e.g. Hague invasion act, or inaction when there's only humanitarian gain, like civil wars in Africa).
Regarding research/drugs: Why would you think the US is owed anything here? Drugs are (typically) not gifted to rest of the world for free. The view that high healthcare prices in the US "pay" for medical advancement is pure propaganda BS: You pay such high prices because you allow the industry to extract so much from you, not because of any kind of altruism.
Don't get me wrong: I don't blame the US for doing things wrong-- I believe the last half century was largely mutually beneficial for US and its allies, but the notion that the US is owed by its allies or even the world is almmost absurd to me; you don't accrue credit by acting in your own interests.
Comment by ks2048 1 day ago
Comment by sxyuan 1 day ago
Military misadventures in the Middle East, trickle up economics, prioritizing corporate profits over things like low cost healthcare, good jobs, or a solid industrial base... These are all products of American culture and politics, not imposed by any other country.
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by sxyuan 1 day ago
At the same time, there are things you can do besides voting. Maybe you already know or do these things, but just putting it out there... You can call your representatives (and they might actually listen, if you're a Democrat in California), you can donate to candidates in other races if you have the means (there are probably going to be some pretty consequential senate races this year), you can join a protest (peacefully, and especially if you don't have any dependents).... And who knows, maybe none of these things will make a difference in the end, but I think the bottom line is that if you truly care about some of these things that are happening right now in the US, it's better to find ways to act on your convictions than to stay frustrated and fume online.
Just my 2 cents.
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by thatguy0900 1 day ago
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
You do not seem to understand how America's position in the world has been used to benefit the country in a massive way post world war II. You can throw that position away, that's your privilege, but the result will be a much smaller economy in which your costs for various items will go up rather than down because a lot of money will no longer flow to the USA.
The amounts you are paying for healthcare, medication etc are not coupled to that but are coupled to your broken political system. You could fix that easily enough but neither the democrats nor the republicans have ever followed that path because you (plural) have been deluded into thinking that that is socialism.
Reducing the USA's standing in the world is not going to fix your political problems but is going to harm your economy in a massive way. The position you are taking here is not consistent and whether you voted for Trump or not is not relevant because it effectively carries water for him: this is precisely the kind of thing that an uninformed Trump supporter would say.
Comment by mancerayder 1 day ago
59% of U.S. adult citizens support “Medicare for all” (27% oppose, 14% not sure)
So are "we" voting against our own interests? Have you considered that neither party, including the Democrats we're supposedly too foolish to vote for, support this. The political system is infiltrated with a large amount of money which we call "lobbying". This lobbying is illegal in the major democracies in Europe, leaving the impression that "Americans are voting against their own interests."
Hope I've made a better case than BBC or French TV5!
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by jacquesm 1 day ago
Your 'socialized healthcare' is a very weak version of it, there is no other country where medical issues can spiral out of control financially in the way they do in the United States.
I know the political parties are as corrupt as they get but that is your problem to fix, even so Trump's talking points, that the USA has been financing the rest of the world are plain bullshit.
Comment by mancerayder 1 day ago
Key Figures & Trends (from Fraser Institute & CIHI reports, late 2025): National Median Wait: ~28.6 weeks (down slightly from 30 weeks in 2024). Longest Waits: New Brunswick (~60.9 weeks), PEI (~49.7 weeks). Shortest Waits: Ontario (~19.2 weeks). By Specialty: Neurosurgery (49.9 weeks), Orthopaedic Surgery (48.6 weeks) were longest; Oncology (Radiation 4.2, Medical 4.7 weeks) shortest. Diagnostics: CT (8.8 weeks), MRI (18.1 weeks).
That's pretty bad. In the U.S. you wait one week for an MRI and it's paid for, minus copay, by your insurance if your insurance is good. The U.S. healthcare is pretty great if you a) work b) work in a place that gives you good healthcare or c) are old enough to qualify for Medicare. It also depends on which state you are in, since the state laws differ on healthcare (Texas and New York are not the same).
But I don't think your point is fact-finding, it's hating on the U.S. or provoking.
I know the political parties are as corrupt as they get but that is your problem to fix, even so Trump's talking points, that the USA has been financing the rest of the world are plain bullshit.
Not sure the point of this angry statement.
Comment by croon 1 day ago
Comment by array_key_first 1 day ago
Comment by ottah 1 day ago
Comment by Gud 1 day ago
And that's not even considering the direction the US is heading, I mean in it's current state.
Comment by croon 1 day ago
I'm not sure you're disagreeing with GP.
Comment by ottah 1 day ago
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by ozlikethewizard 1 day ago
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by Barrin92 1 day ago
The argument always seems to be that the US is getting these rough deals, but objectively what it has spent the last few years be it in terms of soft power for organizations like this or in weapons to Ukraine, a few decades ago people would have opened champagne bottles getting that much bang for your buck.
This is British "the EU is stealing your NHS money" stuff, like it doesn't work at a basic level of arithmetics. What's driving spending in the US is entitlements, literally a straight line up
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by xethos 1 day ago
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by xethos 1 day ago
I applaud the consistency you put on display regarding the US budget though, and I gotta say you view (on this) probably should count more than mine - I'm a Canadian citizen, not American
Comment by cosmicgadget 1 day ago
And even if you think this is the right move, it's important to acknowledge that it's for all the wrong reasons.
Comment by myth_drannon 1 day ago
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by bulbar 1 day ago
I always find it so weird to assume such things are done out of good heart. The US has always been dependent on their ability of world wide power projection, because that's a level that always works. Through 'America first', in the next years the US will experience a decline of beneficial trade deals and US-interest friendly foreign politics. It's net negative for everybody except China and Russia to some degree.
> I also want Americans to get the same deal Europeans and Canadians get on prescription drugs.
That's not about foreign politics though. If you didn't want Billionaires to get richer, you shouldn't vote for one of them being the president.
Comment by ta9000 1 day ago
Comment by disgruntledphd2 1 day ago
Then you should fix your laws. Like, until a year or two ago Medicare was forbidden from negotiating drug prices. Coupled with the absurdity of direct to consumer advertising of drugs (only allowed in the US and New Zealand), plus your massively complicated health care system, it's a recipe for disaster.
On the world police thing, I'm definitely sympathetic, but this was something your government did for a mix of selfish and altruistic reasons, and the consequences of not doing it will be bad in some ways for Americans. I do think that Europe/EU need to step up here, and it looks like we're finally doing this. I'd also note that of the current potential world police (US, Russia, China) you guys are the least worst.
Comment by tv-12921293 1 day ago
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/trump-family-corruption...
Comment by apexalpha 1 day ago
Comment by perfmode 1 day ago
Comment by tsoukase 1 day ago
Comment by kegsy 1 day ago
- why did the Trump administration decide to leave the WHO?
- what impact will this have?
- is this at all beneficial to other countries that aren't the US?
Comment by throwerxyz 1 day ago
Why did Covid cause every government to become authoritarian on the directions of the WHO which couldn't even, itself, verify what stance to hold authority on.
Comment by sillyfluke 1 day ago
Comment by spicyusername 1 day ago
The bar is so low, but god I cannot wait until we have another president that I don't think about more than a few times a year.
If we just didn't have a president at all for a term it would be an improvement.
Comment by estearum 1 day ago
It's like these people think they're watching WWE.
Comment by jonway 1 day ago
So Yes, in effect, these people are literally watching WWE.
Comment by alexilliamson 1 day ago
Comment by Nursie 1 day ago
Can't imagine what it must be like on the inside, I am looking forward to that no longer being the case, one day.
Comment by SanjayMehta 1 day ago
Comment by cosmicgadget 1 day ago
Comment by SanjayMehta 1 day ago
Comment by cosmicgadget 1 day ago
Comment by SanjayMehta 20 hours ago
Trump is a highly functional dementia patient.
From the comedic value, I prefer Trump.
He blurts out whatever nonsense is in his head, it's hilarious. I also appreciate his straightforward criminality, he's not playing the usual "rules based order" games, just a real estate thug in power. It's so refreshing to watch.
Comment by estearum 19 hours ago
> The term [stupidity], he said, wasn’t a description of intellectual acuity, but of social responsibility. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person, or to a group of persons, while deriving no gain for himself, and possibly incurring losses.
https://www.onthewing.org/user/Bonhoeffer%20-%20Theory%20of%...
Comment by pupppet 1 day ago
Comment by SanjayMehta 1 day ago
Comment by estearum 1 day ago
Epistemologically insane, and that's not to mention the plainly obvious fact that even if the corruption were equal (which you openly admit actually doesn't comport with visible evidence), doing it visibly is clearly much more harmful to our society.
Taken to the extreme, someone can be the most rotten, corrupt soul on the planet, and so long as they truly keep it to themselves, none of us would even know about it, much less be affected by it.
Comment by SanjayMehta 1 day ago
Comment by estearum 1 day ago
A more important question: How would someone look if they walked around insisting that a tree had recently fallen, but they can't tell you when/where/how because no one was around to hear it?
"But trust me, it was just as big as the one that fell on Bob's house, so I don't even see what anyone is upset about."
Comment by dfxm12 1 day ago
It's bad that Biden was silent. This enabled the mainstream media, which is captured by conservative oligarchs, to define Biden's presidency. There's going to be an onslaught of news either way, and it's already an uphill battle for anyone who isn't right wing to get a fair shake. So, you shouldn't let others make the news for you. Biden expanded overtime pay and oversaw a number of worker and consumer protections. It's bad that he wasn't tooting his own horn about this stuff!
Additionally, for America to ever return to being the shining example of democracy it claims to be, the next administration needs to very publicly make an example of the current administration. Americans, and the world, need to know that authoritarians have no place in America.
Comment by hackingonempty 1 day ago
There is no chance of that happening. Trump will pardon every single person in his administration and anyone else who carried water for him. The next President will say "we have to move on" and Trump himself will ride off into the sunset with the billions he made for himself and his family.
Comment by spicyusername 1 day ago
The problem is what he's doing.
Not needing to think about the president, or politics in general for that matter, has nothing to do with how much media coverage there is. The whole point of delegating professionals to handle making all the decisions is exactly so that you don't have to think about them yourself.
Comment by dfxm12 1 day ago
Comment by spicyusername 1 day ago
I fear you're interpreting what I'm saying the wrong way.
Imagine you have two children. As with any loving parent, doing what you can to support your children is paramount.
One of your children has substance abuse issues and has been struggling to keep a job and the other is running a few successful bookstores in a vacation town and recently got married.
Of course you don't have favorites. And of course you will do what you need to do to make each child successful.
But one of those children you're going to spend a lot more time thinking and worrying about than the other. But that does not mean you're not taking your job supporting either of them seriously.
I'm saying I'm getting real tired of thinking about which rehab center is best and googling the effects of barbiturates, if you know what I mean.
Comment by bediger4000 1 day ago
Comment by red-iron-pine 1 day ago
no one remembers the constant mud slinging at obama?
Comment by dfxm12 1 day ago
Comment by jonway 1 day ago
Biden removed troops from Foreign Wars, Donald Trump does the opposite and instead pretends he stopped 8 wars or something.
This is just poor memory. Us Americans are notorious for this, unfortunately.
Comment by leetrout 1 day ago
Instead we have been sold to someone(s) that only want to see us divided internally and externally expanding our isolationist stances.
It just feels like everything is taking polarization to the extreme.
I feel really terrible imagining what my daughter will inherit from all of this.
Comment by golden-face 1 day ago
Comment by kjsingh 1 day ago
No one appreciates the hard work when lives are saved. Let some people die and you can rile your base
Comment by lateforwork 1 day ago
Here's what we know: In 2014, Obama administration halted the so called "gain of function" research because of risk of laboratory accidents. In 2017, the Trump administration restarted this dangerous research. See links below.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/white-house-to-cut-fun...
Excerpt: [Obama] White House announced Friday that it would temporarily halt all new funding for experiments that seek to study certain infectious agents by making them more dangerous. The White House said the moratorium decision had been made “following recent biosafety incidents at federal research facilities.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih...
Excerpt: [Trump administration] on Tuesday ended a moratorium imposed three years ago on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal. Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.
So, Trump restarted the dangerous research that Obama had shut down. You may be thinking, what does that have to do with Covid? Covid started in Wuhan, China, right?
It turns out that the Trump administration, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH), provided funding to the EcoHealth Alliance, an American non-profit organization focused on studying emerging diseases. The EcoHealth Alliance, in turn, provided funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China for researching bat coronaviruses. The rest is history.
Comment by tim333 1 day ago
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
What should he have done that he didn't do, in your opinion? Fwiw, it was the economic shock from COVID that caused this situation where he's come back to ruin our lives again. Any further disruption to the economy during COVID would have exacerbated that
Comment by LargeWu 1 day ago
Comment by TimorousBestie 1 day ago
I’ll just run down the record and stop at the first obvious error.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._federal_government_respon...
> One month after [March 16, 2020, when the administration first recommended social distancing], epidemiologists Britta Jewell and Nicholas Jewell estimated that, had social distancing policies been implemented just two weeks earlier, U.S. deaths due to COVID-19 might have been reduced by 90%.
So there’s a concrete thing he could have done differently.
> Any further disruption to the economy during COVID would have exacerbated that
More stringent restrictions done earlier may have shortened the duration of the economic impact, who knows, we can’t exactly observe those alternate timelines directly.
The administration had zero discipline on messaging and so nothing was done with any consistency. As you say, he was initially positive that a vaccine would arrive quickly; when it was available, he flipped and endorsed alternative treatments of all kinds, many of them harmful. Formerly a champion of Dr. Fauci, then later his worst detractor and chief prosecutor in the court of public opinion.
Comment by ndjeosibfb 1 day ago
Comment by pstuart 1 day ago
Comment by FridayoLeary 1 day ago
Comment by TimorousBestie 1 day ago
Doesn’t line up with WHO’s record of events.
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
Comment by zombot 1 day ago
Comment by FridayoLeary 1 day ago
Comment by nephihaha 1 day ago
Comment by airstrike 1 day ago
Comment by nephihaha 1 day ago
It has spent the entire 2020s trying to push through a global treaty allowing them to declare situations independently of national governments. The backlash has been huge, especially since this can have consequences going beyond healthcare.
Comment by overtone1000 1 day ago
WHO is, like every scientific or humanitarian endeavor, imperfect. But the list of goods they've done in the world dwarves the list of failures.
Comment by throwworhtthrow 1 day ago
UNESCO, well, I'm looking at its website and Wikipedia article now, and I don't understand what it does. (Or maybe it would be easier to list what it doesn't do, since even its list of sponsored institutions is mind-numbingly long.)
Comment by nephihaha 1 day ago
The WHO has been trying to push through an international treaty since 2020 which would allow them to override national governments on health matters.
Comment by cosmicgadget 1 day ago
Comment by aprilthird2021 1 day ago
Any example of a diktat from on high which you think was highly negative? Afaik, these bodies typically just promote whatever is scientifically / economically / etc. the prevailing worldview
Comment by sizzleflip5000 1 day ago
Comment by apexalpha 1 day ago
Besides that the general decline of the American Empire seems relevant enough for today's world.
Comment by sizzleflip5000 1 day ago
Comment by kccoder 1 day ago
Comment by sillyfluke 1 day ago
Comment by sizzleflip5000 1 day ago
Comment by throwerxyz 1 day ago
Comment by tehjoker 1 day ago
Comment by dralley 1 day ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/world/biden-restores-who-...
So, like, what exactly is the point of making up reasons to hate Democrats. Obviously it's all the rage on the left (as on the right) to do so, but fabrications from the left are no better than fabrications from the right.
Comment by tehjoker 1 day ago
There is strong continuity on foreign policy between administrations.
You have to put this in context that Trump is also creating what appears to be an alternative venue to the UN with the "Board of Peace" which was originally a colonial authority to impose our will on Gaza, but its charter doesn't mention Gaza at all and talks about international conflict in general.
Comment by dralley 1 day ago
Again, I feel like you have to live in an alternate universe to think that there is much continuity on foreign policy between Trump and <insert Democrat here>. Or you have to be laser focused on one or two similarities and ignore the vast chasms of difference on everything else.
Comment by tehjoker 1 day ago
There are a number of places where there are superficial differences, and those differences are important to people of color, trans people, etc, but the Dems are always looking for reasons to make a right turn. They track the Republicans who actively move right and create a small space a relative distance from their position.
Comment by estearum 1 day ago
You realize we just kidnapped a head of state, we're currently repositioning strike forces around Iran, and we just caused NATO to reposition troops to Greenland to defend against imminent US invasion?
Can you please identify events that you see as "continuous" with these ones?
Comment by tehjoker 1 day ago
The Democrats are better at dressing things up and making it look like they're the good guys when they do the same stuff.
We are in a reorientation of American policy. Trump isn't doing this without consent from our elites, the same people that fund the Democrats who suspiciously aren't fighting it.
Comment by vpribish 1 day ago
Comment by red-iron-pine 1 day ago
but said account was very like a shillbot, even if proper attribution is hard
Comment by tehjoker 1 day ago
What I am saying does not compute to you because you are tribalistic in your thinking. As the old quote goes: "The United States is also a one-party state, but with typical American extravagance, they have two of them."
Comment by estearum 1 day ago
Comment by Insanity 1 day ago
Comment by Cipater 1 day ago
Comment by Carrok 1 day ago
Comment by myth_drannon 1 day ago
Comment by ggm 1 day ago
I do not like this outcome but surely nobody is surprised? The specific act took a year to enact. They had to announce the intent to withdraw back in 24/25.
This is politics. The impact on worldwide health will take a while to emerge but the impact on soft power will be clear if and when other WHO members pick up the slack.