Israel Pumps Desalinated Water into Depleted Sea of Galilee
Posted by geox 1 day ago
Comments
Comment by RobMurray 1 day ago
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
and if you will read the article, there is nothing about filling the lake. it will add 0.5cm/month. kineret is now 4.63m below "full" line
Comment by netsharc 1 day ago
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
80-90% of potable water comes from desalination, and 90% of waste water is recycled
Comment by cbeach 1 day ago
Comment by aagha 1 day ago
Comment by Gud 22 hours ago
Comment by cbeach 21 hours ago
Firstly "homeland":
The last owners of "Palestine" were the British. But if we trace the history of the region further to see who the real indigenous people were, you'll find it were Jews, who were there for more than a thousand years before the religion of Islam even existed. The fact that there are mosques on this land is only a symptom of the colonial conquest of the land by Islam. If you want to know whose "homeland" this is you need to go back further in time.
Secondly "open air prison":
Egypt prevents Gazans from leaving Gaza over the Rafah border crossing due to the political and security issues Gazans have presented to Egypt - not because Egypt is deliberately "imprisoning" Gazans. Obviously, the Israeli border with Gaza has to exist, because if it didn't, the terrorist regime in charge of Gaza makes no secret of the fact they would repeat the October 7th attrocity, and many more thousands of innocent Israelis would be killed by Gazans. And that's on top of the rocket attacks from Gaza to Israeli towns, which have been going on for many years.
The fact Israel provides Gaza with energy, water, jobs, and telecoms always baffles me. Gaza's government literally wrote in their Charter that they existed to see the "annihilation" of the Jewish state. It is extremely magnanimous the Israel provides Gaza with ANY services whatsoever.
Comment by ubertaco 1 day ago
Even if you didn't bother to actually read reporting or see images from the ground of children being shot in their mothers' arms by the IDF and such real horrors perpetrated against civilians who are obviously and visibly non-combatants, it's puzzling how nothing in the hyperbolic, propagandic tone of the alleged quote leads you to question its veracity (or even makes you look twice at taking Russia Today TV as a trustworthy source).
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
You realize getting civilians killed by using them as human shields is an actual Hamas strategy(and war crime) right?[0]
[0] https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/11/middleeast/sinwar-hamas-israe...
Comment by cbeach 23 hours ago
That's why I quoted Hamas themselves. Because that's not Israeli propaganda. It's a factual account from a primary source.
And if you like I can provide the Hamas-supplied footage of attrocities committed against more than a thousand Israeli civilians on a -single day-.
Let's stick to primary sources if we're going to compare the horrors happening in Israel and Gaza.
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
What exactly are you claiming is false?
> Palestinians living in the West Bank, where there is no Hamas
Now this is just blatantly false, while Hamas might not be the rulers of the West Bank they certainly have a significant presence and high popularity there. If the PA were to hold free and fair elections in the West Bank Hamas would almost certainly win those elections.
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
Comment by jameshilliard 11 hours ago
There are plenty of Palestinian terrorism related security issues in the West Bank.
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
Major reason why there are no elections in west bank, it's because current palestinian government knows that hamas will win
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
By the way, Hamas is so bad that Netanyahu was actively helping funding it before the start of the war[1]. I guess that you should consider Netanyahu and your intelligence services as terrorists, then?
Israel will spend 750M$ on advertising next year to clean its international image. I really wonder why, since they do only the right things!
[1]https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/2020-02-24/ty-artic...
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
As you probably missed news from decade ago, when PA and Hamas had one of their fights, PA stopped paying for gaza bills and salaries of 50k or so employees in gaza. International news had headlines that hundreds of thousands of people in gaza will starve to death because they have no money to buy food and that all services in gaza will collapse and it will be humanitarian catastrophe. So under pressure from international organizations and news Israel allowed qatari funds to be transferred to gaza in order to sustain pa employees and services
and israel spent $750m on advertisement, because as you prove it, people don't know history beyond what is shown on latest tiktok
ps. also jews in west bank are indigenous population that was ethnically cleansed by jordan in 1948. not "colonizers"
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/02/1160066
What you are saying about the Hamas funding is false, as the article states, Qatar has funded the Hamas with more than a billion dollars between 2012 and 2019 with Israel's approval. As your comments show, Hamas is a convenient opponent that allows Israel to justify its colonization. If it were to disappear it would be a serious problem.
Jews in the West Bank are not indigenous, the religious zionists who come there are mainly orthodox jews from Europe racially white. And even then, it doesn't allow you to steal land. The Palestinians today are not collectively responsible for the actions of other Arab States after the war.
Comment by tguvot 17 hours ago
qatari money was allowed into gaza by request of international community to stabilize humanitarian situation.
jews in west bank are indigenous. those area called Judea & Samaria and were renamed into west bank by jordan after 1948 in order to erase connection with jews. there been continuous jewish population in west bank for thousands of years with exception of period after 1929 hebron massacre and jordanian ethnic cleansing of jews in 1948.
most of jews in israel are those that were expelled by arab/north african countries. if you will ever visit israel, it will be hard for you to figure out who is jew and who is arab, because they look same. also, unlike you, we don't separate jews based on their origin, because they are all jews
Comment by dragonwriter 1 day ago
PA has to ask Israel to do anything of substance in the WB, because the WB is a mix of Israeli and PA controlled areas, with Israel controlling internal boundaries even between adjacent PA-controlled areas.
> Major reason why there are no elections in west bank, it's because current palestinian government knows that hamas will win
No, the only reason is that Israel has refused to cooperate with all-Palestine elections negotiated and agreed to between Fatah (the party in control of the PA government) and Hamas, on multiple occasions (because Israel administers parts of the WB, and for other reasons, active Israeli cooperation would be necessary.)
Most likely because the divide between the Fatah-led PA and Hamas, and the ability to portray both as undemocratic, serves Israeli's propaganda and other interests.
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
It's much more than just that, the PA/Fatah is considered to be very weak and are extremely unpopular in the West Bank. If Israel didn't intervene Hamas would likely oust Fatah in the West Bank similar to what happened in Gaza.
> the only reason is that Israel has refused to cooperate with all-Palestine elections negotiated and agreed to between Fatah (the party in control of the PA government) and Hamas
Fatah knows they would lose an election in the West Bank to Hamas, this is something neither Israel or Fatah wants, hence no elections.
> Most likely because the divide between the Fatah-led PA and Hamas, and the ability to portray both as undemocratic, serves Israeli's propaganda and other interests.
They tried all-Palestine elections in 2006[0], that backfired spectacularly. Hamas was elected in what were generally considered free and fair elections, pretty hard to get a good election outcome if a majority or at least a plurality of the population wants to elect terrorists.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Palestinian_legislative_e...
Comment by dragonwriter 1 day ago
Nice story, but Fatah actually negotiated and agreed to details for all-Palestine elections with Hamas; Israel declined to allow them to occur.
> They tried all-Palestine elections in 2006[0], that backfired spectacularly. Hamas was elected in what were generally considered free and fair elections, pretty hard to get a good election outcome if a majority or at least a plurality of the population wants to elect terrorists.
The US and Israel call all resistance to Israeli occupation terrorism; the PLO (not the Fatah faction but the whole umbrella organization), which is organizationally coextensive with the Palestinian Authority, is a Congressionally-designated foreign terrorist organization which has had Presidential waivers allowing certain interactions since 1993.
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
Was this like a case of them agreeing to something they knew Israel would never allow(letting Hamas officials run in Palestinian elections)?
> The US and Israel call all resistance to Israeli occupation terrorism;
I don't think this is true, it's generally the violent resistance that is called terrorism, probably because there's quite a lot of that going on.
> the PLO (not the Fatah faction but the whole umbrella organization), which is organizationally coextensive with the Palestinian Authority, is a Congressionally-designated foreign terrorist organization which has had Presidential waivers allowing certain interactions since 1993.
Presumably that would be due to the PLO having engaged in and supported terrorism[0]. The Martyrs Fund is not exactly small:
> These payments, total more than $300 million annually, representing approximately 7 percent of the PA's annual budget.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_Authority_Martyrs_...
Comment by g8oz 1 day ago
Israeli settlers have murdered upwards of a thousand Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7th. They're never held accountable and have significant support from the right-wing members of the coalition government - cabinet minister Ben-Gvir was the lawyer for the settlers who burnt a Palestinian baby alive. Numerous Palestinian communities have been ethnically cleansed in a systematic campaign. The ultimate motivation for these actions is the ethnic supremacist cult of Zionism. The Palestinians could turn into a bunch of Scandinavian vegans tomorrow and it would not change a thing because it is the Zionist ideology that creates and maintains the conflict as part of its intrinsic nature.
You have spammed this discussion with enough misleading "facts" to paint a picture of a throwback Bush Jr era American bloviator. Please give it a rest now.
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
Doesn't give them a right to commit war crimes though.
> In so far as the resistance is confined to military targets it's entirely lawful.
Palestinian "resistance" tends to not confine themselves to military targets in general.
> The same sort of Westerner who immediately understands Ukrainian resistance struggles to understand the Palestinian perspective.
I don't recall Ukrainian resistance targeting civilians in general.
> They're never held accountable and have significant support from the right-wing members of the coalition government - cabinet minister Ben-Gvir was the lawyer for the settlers who burnt a Palestinian baby alive.
Ben-Gvir was convicted of supporting a terrorist organization by Israeli courts and has very little support amongst the Israeli public, Israel just tends to get more extremists in the Knesset due to the proportional voting system than say in a country with a two party system.
> The ultimate motivation for these actions is the ethnic supremacist cult of Zionism.
Jews have a pretty bad history when it comes to living as ethnic minorities in other countries, it's not surprising that they would want at least 1 state in which they are an ethnic majority amongst the many Muslim majority states.
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
Kinda ironic for someone defending the right of Israel to commit war crimes against civilians. Can we talk about the massive Israeli protests on the noble topic of "we should be allowed to r+p3 prisoners"?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-hamas-war-idf-palestinia...
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
I don't recall defending anyone deliberately committing war crimes against civilians, I should note that collateral damage by itself is not a war crime of course.
> Can we talk about the massive Israeli protests on the noble topic of "we should be allowed to r+p3 prisoners"?
I'm not defending them, Israel has some issues with extremists for sure, although it's far from being as bad as Palestinian extremism which sadly tends to have surprisingly high levels of support amongst Palestinians. Most Israelis don't support these sort of things and just want to live in peace.
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
What is the point where "collateral damage" and "killing civilians" aren't different? We saw well in Gaza how the Israeli government didn't care at all about civilians and just razed entire cities.
It's not "just this time": Israelis have been involved in terrorist killings against civilians since even before the existence of Israel, and continued the atrocities against civilians after[1], with the goal to displace them.
> "Most Israelis want to live in peace"
Yet support colonization and elect far-right governments which openly defend an imperialistic "Great Israel" agenda.[2]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cast_Thy_Bread [2] https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/netanyahu-says-...
Comment by jameshilliard 11 hours ago
Essentially "collateral damage" is not intentional targeting of civilians. The laws of war allow for "collateral damage" as they were written in a way so as not to encourage the use of human shields.
> We saw well in Gaza how the Israeli government didn't care at all about civilians and just razed entire cities.
They made efforts to move civilians out of the way, deaths compared to the amount of damage is quite low. Not a lot of options when Hamas built tunnels under most of the cities.
> Yet support colonization and elect far-right governments which openly defend an imperialistic "Great Israel" agenda.[2]
It's generally not even clear what "Greater Israel" means in general. In any case the best option for those concerned about "Greater Israel" would be to negotiate peace agreements that solidify borders.
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cast_Thy_Bread
I'm skeptical anyone involved in that would even be alive at this point.
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
Lovely article about their attempted operation there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024%E2%80%932025_Palestinian_...
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
There probably needs to be some sort of serious de-radicalization process in the West Bank if there is to be any chance of ending the occupation without starting another war.
Israel was taught that unilateral disengagement is not a viable strategy for peace, it didn't work in Gaza and it didn't work in Lebanon either with Hezbollah, peace in the region comes from bilateral peace agreements that are agreed to by both sides(i.e. like with Jordan/Egypt) and not from unilateral actions on the part of Israel(like the 2005 Gaza disengagement).
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Just this month Israel killed 2 brothers (children), because they were identified as a threat. They continue to expand settlements, and they bomb during ceasefires. Can you give me any example of Israel really attempting peace? 2005 disengagement, but they have the levers to keep Gazans on the brink of death, by bottlenecking food, water, etc. Just because it's called disengagement, doesn't mean it really is. Don't accept their propaganda at face value, or anyone's, obviously.
"Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas ... This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank."
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
In the past there has been some desire to do so, although that's faded quite a bit as it has become clear there is at the moment no real partner for peace on the Palestinian side. Palestinians need a leader who is truly interested in peace, sort of like Sadat was in Egypt who was critical to normalizing relations with Israel. Ultimately what many in Israel want is a real peace deal, but without a party on the other side that's going to be pretty difficult.
> Just this month Israel killed 2 brothers (children), because they were identified as a threat.
I'm not sure what specific incident this is in reference to but there are plenty of security threats in both the West Bank and Gaza, and it's pretty well known that Hamas uses child soldiers as well as human shields.
> They continue to expand settlements
I agree this is problematic, but terrorism is likely only going to encourage settlement expansion as settlements are seen by some in Israel as providing a security barrier. Israel is a country lacking in strategic depth[0] and the West Bank is especially problematic due to its proximity cities like Tel Aviv. After the previous failed unilateral disengagements in Gaza and Lebanon I think it's extremely unlikely for Israel to continue with that strategy.
> they bomb during ceasefires
Often in retaliation for ceasefire violations on the part of terrorists.
> Can you give me any example of Israel really attempting peace?
For example the 2000 Camp David Summit, where Israel made a number of offers that Palestinian leadership rejected without making any concrete counteroffers, this peace attempt immediately preceded the Second Intifada. Part of the reason Israel is often wary of peace attempts like this is due to Palestinian leadership not negotiating in good faith.
> 2005 disengagement, but they have the levers to keep Gazans on the brink of death, by bottlenecking food, water, etc.
What do you expect Israel to do when Hamas starts attacking Israel and stockpiling weapons. If Israel hadn't been attacked I think it would have been pretty unlikely for them to have blockaded Gaza.
> Just because it's called disengagement, doesn't mean it really is. Don't accept their propaganda at face value, or anyone's, obviously.
They evicted every Israeli from Gaza and gave it a try, clearly unilateral disengagement just doesn't work, and in the case of Lebanon with Hezbollah Israel had a similar issue and there wasn't even a blockade there.
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Also by any chance if you have a response to the Netanyahu quote I gave.
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
Palestine wasn't ever an independent state. Israel was formed by the division of a British Mandate.
> If someone took over your home, and offered even 90% of it to you, and invader keeps 10%, you would reject it.
Jews immigrated often by purchasing land in the region from landowners(often absentee) and then sometimes evicting the tenants, so it's a bit more complex. Characterizing it as a foreign invasion is somewhat misleading, Palestinians also rejected the UN partition plan and started a war to try and remove all the Jews as well, with many Jews subsequently being driven from their homes throughout the middle east, so it's not like they have any other homes to go back to either. Being on the losing side of a war also tends to result in people losing land/homes in any case, I have grandparents that lost their home due to living in country that was on the losing side of a war as well and they made no attempts to get their homes/land back at all, sometimes you just have to move on.
> Hopefully we can get rid of the evil parts of both governments, and make a new single state for everyone.
This is basically unworkable from both sides for various reasons. Israel will essentially never give up their Jewish majority by giving citizenship to all Palestinians, especially given the security threats to Jews historically. That's one reason a two state solution is widely considered the only viable option.
> All peace interested parties can be a part of the new government, ridding Netanyahu/Hamas types from the process.
This seems pretty unlikely to ever work in practice, at least not without massive changes in opinions amongst both Palestinians and Israelis.
> Also by any chance if you have a response to the Netanyahu quote I gave.
What about it? I'm not much of a fan of Netanyahu in general for various reasons, but Israel is a democracy so he can be replaced.
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
Comment by jameshilliard 1 day ago
There were also a number of of Pogroms as well as back and forth retaliation/attacks, organizations like the Irgun did not just pop up randomly out of nowhere.
You seen to have a very one-sided view of history when the reality of the situation has a lot more nuance. That's the thing with this conflict, you can somewhat easily create a narrative that any particular side is at fault depending on how far back you go in history(Jews lived in the region well before Muhammad was even born which certainly makes any notion of one side being more native highly problematic) as well as by cherry-picking facts. It's basically a sort of endless back and forth retaliation.
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
The justification of the Irgun terrorism because of the Arab riots is comical - then does that mean that groups such as the Hamas are justified in their existence as they resist against the Israeli colonizers? The Irgun was a political organization at its core, which also heavily targeted the British administration, including assassinations and bombings.
I think that it's not "one-sided" to say that Israel should stop supporting the colonization and dismantle the current colonies. Which is simply an application of the international law.
Comment by jameshilliard 11 hours ago
My point was just that both sides have arguably legitimate claims to being native to the region, depending on how you look at things.
> The justification of the Irgun terrorism because of the Arab riots is comical - then does that mean that groups such as the Hamas are justified in their existence as they resist against the Israeli colonizers?
My point was that this conflict is characterized by lots of back and forth retaliation. I'm not justifying terrorism from either side however. In any case the Irgun was disbanded following the establishment of the state of Israel.
> I think that it's not "one-sided" to say that Israel should stop supporting the colonization and dismantle the current colonies.
Unilateral disengagement doesn't work historically, I agree there should be a negotiated peace but at the moment neither side seems to be all that interested in figuring out a solution.
> Which is simply an application of the international law.
International law is far from clear in general, especially since the original occupiers of Gaza and the West Bank(Egypt and Jordan) relinquished all claims to the land.
Comment by Saline9515 10 hours ago
The fact that you consider that a blond ashkenazi ukrainian jew has the same "legitimate claim" than a Palestinian to live in the West Bank tells me all about your bias here. A large part of Palestinians have lived uninterrupted for 2000 years there - you can find sects such as the Samaritans that were referenced in the Bible. And even then, it's stupid to consider a religious book as a sufficient proof for a "claim".
> Irgun
Most of the actions of the Irgun were assassinations against the British, which weren't exactly doing pogroms in Palestine at the time. The Irgun was a terrorist organization, Israel continued to operate with the same rulebook after.
> Unilateral disengagement doesn't work historically
Israel decided unilaterally to steal, colonize and support settler violence. The argument "but both parties don't want peace" is really a manipulation when there are 250 settler attacks per month and the Israeli police refuses to act.[0]
What are the options for Palestinians, when every night settlers come to their houses, point guns and lasers at them, wait for half an hour, then leave? (Documented in Louis Theroux's "The Settlers"). The only option is to leave, which is why settlers do this with the support of the military.
If Israel wanted peace, it would stop this: the balance of power is so unbalanced that it's hard to blame Palestinians for not wanting to give their last sovereignty rights. With the same line of thinking one could argue that Afghani women could do some efforts to be nice to their husbands, heh.
> International law is far from clear in general, especially since the original occupiers of Gaza and the West Bank(Egypt and Jordan) relinquished all claims to the land.
It is well defined, stop lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Bank_areas_in_the_Oslo_II...
[0] https://apnews.com/article/settler-violence-netanyahu-palest...
Comment by jameshilliard 5 hours ago
When did I reference a religious book as proof of anything? I'm just referring to historical evidence in general regarding Jews being clearly native to the region as well. Jews have of course maintained a presence in Israel for the past 2000 years to various degrees.
> Most of the actions of the Irgun were assassinations against the British, which weren't exactly doing pogroms in Palestine at the time. The Irgun was a terrorist organization, Israel continued to operate with the same rulebook after.
The British were however preventing Jewish immigration to some degree and I'm not really convinced all those attacks on British officers would fall under terrorism due to the military nature of British officers...western countries preventing Jewish immigration is one of the reasons so many Jews died in the Holocaust. The Irgun was dissolved by the IDF shortly after Israel became independent, essentially by force[0], having rogue militias operating within ones borders tends to be incompatible with a stable state(i.e. Lebanon). It's interesting that you seem far more concerned about a short lived Jewish paramilitary organization with a history of some terrorism compared to the long standing Palestinian paramilitary organizations with an extensive history of terrorism.
> Israel decided unilaterally to steal, colonize and support settler violence. The argument "but both parties don't want peace" is really a manipulation when there are 250 settler attacks per month and the Israeli police refuses to act.
Unilateral disengagement simply does not lead to peace regardless of how the conflict started, this is mostly an argument that peace must be negotiated prior to disengagement from a conflict, otherwise the conflict will simply continue. Israel learned that disengagements without a negotiated peace deal like in Gaza/Lebanon do not work. Obviously right now neither side seems to be all that interested in negotiating peace, Israelis in general probably want to see some sort of peace agreement but after Oct 7 they are obviously not likely to think the Palestinians are really interested in peace(the second intifada came after peace negotiations failed, largely due to Palestinian leadership being unwilling to finalize a deal).
> the balance of power is so unbalanced that it's hard to blame Palestinians for not wanting to give their last sovereignty rights.
Maybe Palestinian leadership could try something new like making a good faith attempt at a real peace deal? I mean clearly terrorism as a strategy for them to get sovereignty rights isn't working out too well.
> It is well defined, stop lying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Bank_areas_in_the_Oslo_II...
You're linking to an agreement that more or less deferred many things like borders to be negotiated at a later point...so yeah international law is not very clear in general.
Comment by tptacek 10 hours ago
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
real documented examples, not some articles about settlers stealing homes
Comment by Saline9515 1 day ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rwmE9JDZbTE
Here images of a "house-jacking": https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5D5-0bKtwuY
Comment by tguvot 17 hours ago
Comment by Saline9515 14 hours ago
Comment by tguvot 14 hours ago
looks like they were searching for something stolen.
Comment by Saline9515 10 hours ago
More : Armed settlers roam around olive trees and steal the harvest: https://archive.ph/OTQ1V
Settlers break into homes and force villagers to flee: https://www.middleeasteye.net/live-blog/live-blog-update/isr...
Settlers come armed with clubs and smash windows while asking the family to leave the house: https://www.btselem.org/video/20251109_settlers_attacked_a_h...
Armed settlers ask families to leave at gunpoint https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/04/17/west-bank-israel-respons...
50 settlers come into a village and burn houses https://www.timesofisrael.com/dozens-of-settlers-attack-home...
Settlers beat up an old lady harvesting her olive trees https://apnews.com/article/settler-violence-netanyahu-palest...
The last link has hard data about violence (250 attacks per month). You can try to pilpul, but those people are clearly doing a human safari, with no law enforcement and consider Palestinians as animals. Defending this tells me all I need to know about your morality: in practice, you defend an ongoing, slow genocide that you well know it's happening. Everything has been documented, it's not just me that watches tik tok videos (I don't).
Comment by tguvot 9 hours ago
btw, go look up how many attacks were against israeli in last month. also, UN/etc count anything instigated/initiated by palestinians as violence. it just conveniently forgets to provide context
so, while there is some (widely publicized) cases of violence, in a big picture it's overblow
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articl...
https://www.regavim.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/RegavimSi...
https://www.jns.org/over-6300-terror-attacks-against-jews-in...
Comment by Saline9515 3 hours ago
Lol, Regavim. The far-right settler organisation that defends land stealers. The fact that it calls left-wing activists "anarchists" is a good indicator of the bias of the report. Their Ukrainian founder just said that new settlements will "bury the idea of a Palestinian State", after positive remarks on the idea of a "Greater Israel" and that his family was "real Palestinians", since "Palestinians are an invented people". And he is the current foreign affairs minister.
Kind of interesting also that the Israeli government puts pressure on Haaretz that is the last non-far right press outlet in the country. Are they just watching videos on Tik Tok, too?
https://wan-ifra.org/2024/11/worlds-press-condemns-israeli-g...
Comment by myth_drannon 17 hours ago
Comment by mhb 20 hours ago
Comment by xenospn 1 day ago
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago
Comment by chimineycricket 1 day ago
Comment by tguvot 1 day ago