Cursor and Claude Opus 4.5 is a game changer
Posted by seinecle 2 days ago
The combination of the two delivers on the promise: fast and clever editing of multiple files in a codebase, with minimal human intervention.
No other model I tried in Cursor comes even close.
Question: did anyone tried Claude Codex: as good as Cursor?
Comments
Comment by linesofcode 2 days ago
All these AI coding tools make me feel like I have superpowers. It’s addictive.
If I had problems finding time and the mental power or motivation to work on projects a few years ago—projects I deemed too large a commitment of time and effort—today with Claude and Cursor I almost have too much time and bandwidth to take on new projects.
When I step back and realize this is the world we’re living in as programmers, I can barely believe it. I want to shout and laugh from joy.
It’s been months since I’ve manually written more than a few lines of syntax, and I can’t imagine ever going back.
If AI coding tools disappeared from the world today, tomorrow I would stop being a programmer—something I’ve done for over 20 years.
Comment by mraza007 2 days ago
I haven’t written any single line of code but i have been able to plan and come up with new ideas faster
I’m more of a product manager than a coder due to these new AI coding tools
Comment by djinnrutger 1 day ago
Comment by x007xyz 22 hours ago
Comment by oumua_don17 2 days ago
Do you mean codex or Claude code standalone without cursor? Codex is OpenAI’s coding tool competing with Claude.
Based on my limited experimentation Claude code is better. I haven’t used any of these coding agents with an ide only from the cli.
Comment by seinecle 1 day ago
I hesitate trying Claude Code, there is a bit of fatigue installing new tools :-)
By the way: ChatGPT 5.1 Codex Max pro, which was rubbish when used directly inside Cursor, is actually very good once I access it via the OpenAI Codex extension installed within Cursor!
Mysteries of toolchains...
Anyway, that proved so useful when I maxed out my Claude credits.