Coffee linked to slower biological ageing among those with severe mental illness
Posted by bookofjoe 5 days ago
Comments
Comment by devilsdata 5 days ago
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/6/1354
I only did a postgraduate degree, so I don't have the practice reading scientific studies to determine which is true. Maybe someone with more knowledge can chime in?
Comment by shoo 5 days ago
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/20...
> Assuming the meta-analyzed evidence from cohort
> studies represents life span–long causal associations, for
> a baseline life expectancy of 80 years, eating 12 hazelnuts
> daily (1 oz) would prolong life by 12 years (ie, 1 year per
> hazelnut), drinking 3 cups of coffee daily would achieve
> a similar gain of 12 extra years, and eating a single man-
> darin orange daily (80 g) would add 5 years of life. Con-
> versely, consuming 1 egg daily would reduce life expec-
> tancy by 6 years, and eating 2 slices of bacon (30 g) daily
> would shorten life by a decade, an effect worse than
> smoking. Could these results possibly be true?
via Andrew Gelman's blog: https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/01/26/article-po...Comment by kfarr 5 days ago
Comment by flowerthoughts 5 days ago
Aside from that, I'd love to know how each of those items affects life quality. Living long is only a life goal up to a certain age, and from what I've seen around me, that age is very rarely 90.
Comment by seec 2 days ago
It feels like trying to be immortal, which is a bit of a folly.
Anyway, the other day I noticed that Warren Buffett is just retiring at the age of 94. The man has eaten McDonald's for breakfast for much of his life. Diet cannot be that big of a deal.
What those epidemiological studies reveal is that food associated with higher class makes you live longer, which is reverse causation, at best.
Comment by jodleif 4 days ago
Edit: i.e a bacon eater consumes a higher than average caloric intake, hazelnut eaters have more greens/vegetables in their diet possibly
Comment by quaverquaver 5 days ago
Comment by quaverquaver 5 days ago
Comment by phyzome 4 days ago
Comment by pandemic_region 4 days ago
Comment by anonnon 5 days ago
The inverse possibility--that nicotine, and perhaps caffeine as well, heighten the risk of psychosis in those genetially predisposed--has also been considered.
Comment by aszantu 4 days ago
Incidentally caffeine calms me down as well.
Comment by rendall 4 days ago
Comment by jimnotgym 4 days ago
Comment by mcmoor 4 days ago
Comment by tootie 5 days ago
Comment by devilsdata 5 days ago
With that said, the fact that the other study seemed to find the opposite conclusion concerns me.
Comment by tootie 4 days ago
Comment by 11Spades 5 days ago
That's not to say that these results might not be significant -- what you propose may be the case -- but I'd want to see an actual mechanism of action before buying something like this.
Comment by maxlamb 4 days ago
Comment by alimw 4 days ago
This confuses me. Aren't all the best degrees postgraduate degrees?
Comment by foota 5 days ago
Comment by devilsdata 5 days ago
That said, instant coffee is just freeze-dried coffee. There's a possibility its effect is no different.
Comment by VladVladikoff 5 days ago
Comment by scroogey 4 days ago
Comment by huijzer 5 days ago
Comment by the_real_cher 5 days ago
There's massive buffer systems in the body.
Comment by huijzer 4 days ago
Comment by the_real_cher 4 days ago
The body is incredibly complex so I'm not saying this is conclusive but here's a source plus a lot of explanation with numerous experiments.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3828631/
Another thing: Calcium strongly associates with acid.
And there's no evidence of osteoporosis or bone leaching with high acid diets.
Comment by camel_gopher 5 days ago
Comment by djaouen 5 days ago
Comment by temp0826 5 days ago
Comment by jama211 4 days ago
We must be careful not to find ways to be judgemental whether intentionally or not, especially when something is non-harmful and helpful to their life. It’s not a good behavioural pattern.
Comment by temp0826 4 days ago
Comment by jama211 2 days ago
Also I was obviously talking about behavioural patterns in general, not judging that specific persons behaviours. The fact that you’d take what you’re doing (being judgemental) and try and paint me unsuccessfully as doing the same thing is an extremely bad faith tactic, and reveals to everyone here that you know exactly what you’re doing here.
This isn’t reddit mate. Acting this way is not appreciated.
Comment by temp0826 2 days ago
Comment by rendall 4 days ago
Before the grumpy start making noise, yes, I absolutely am addicted. If I miss two days, then I get a headache for three days. Still definitely worth it. Everybody should drink coffee. There is no good reason not to.
Comment by dns_snek 4 days ago
They absolutely shouldn't. Many people suffer negative side effects from consuming coffee even if they don't realize it, like anxiety and jitters. Consuming stimulants is also a bad idea if you already have high blood pressure or heart rate.
> The analysis found that participants with severe hypertension who drank two or more cups of coffee each day doubled their risk of dying from cardiovascular disease, compared to those who didn't drink coffee. Drinking just one cup of coffee or any amount of green tea – regardless of blood pressure level – did not raise the risk, the study showed.
https://www.heart.org/en/news/2022/12/21/people-with-very-hi...
Comment by rendall 4 days ago
The more general inference everybody with any high blood pressure or health risk should avoid coffee is not supported by the bulk of epidemiological evidence: moderate coffee use appears at worst neutral for many people, possibly beneficial for some.
A comprehensive meta-analysis of decades' worth of cohort studies concluded that moderate coffee consumption (roughly 2-5 cups/day) was associated with a lower or neutral risk of cardiovascular disease overall (coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, CVD mortality) compared to no coffee.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3945962/
So drink up! Drink all the coffees! Unless you are a reply-guy with severe heart problems and an uncontrollable compulsion to drink mass quantities, then talk to a doctor first.
Also don't drink coffee if you don't like it, or you're a Mormon, a strict Seventh-day Adventist, a member of certain Pentecostal or Anabaptist groups, a Theravāda Buddhist monk, a strict Salafist, or part of a strict Ital-observant Rastafarian community. If in doubt, speak to your bishop, branch president, pastor, priest, imam, monk, or whoever guides your spiritual tradition.
Comment by dns_snek 2 days ago
> Everybody should drink coffee. There is no good reason not to.
Clearly there are many reasons not to drink coffee that may or may not apply to you and so saying that everyone should be drinking coffee is wrong.
Comment by microjim 4 days ago
Comment by rendall 4 days ago
In fact, so few spiritual traditions do forbid it, including the most forbidding and censorious, that it may well be considered miraculous. In my personal religion it is tantamount to a sacrament ;)
Comment by jama211 4 days ago
Comment by rendall 4 days ago
Comment by dns_snek 2 days ago
I didn't say it was bad for health as a general statement, I said that there are many people out there who suffer negative health consequences from caffeine consumption, in response to you telling everyone to drink coffee.
I actually like coffee, I have a fancy hand grinder and everything, my body just doesn't handle it well when consumed on a regular basis and I know people who've had to quit because it made their anxiety so bad that they started getting panic attacks. Telling "everyone" to drink coffee because there's no good reason not to is just wrong and careless and potentially dangerous.
"Not everyone should" != "nobody should"
Comment by tenthirtyam 4 days ago
So... if you want to cut back, just persevere for a few days of no coffee. The statistics don't lie.*
* sample size = 1
Comment by rendall 4 days ago
Comment by busymom0 5 days ago
Comment by djaouen 5 days ago
Comment by cluckindan 5 days ago
Comment by jama211 4 days ago
Just annoyed that studies like this get so much attention compared to studies that provide more value.
Comment by mentos 4 days ago
Comment by Rebelgecko 4 days ago
Comment by tsoukase 4 days ago
Comment by cj 5 days ago
Comment by tim333 4 days ago
Comment by rightbyte 4 days ago
And care takers when you are really bad will hand you coffee but not beer. Etc.
Comment by dyauspitr 4 days ago
Comment by tim333 4 days ago
Comment by tompccs 5 days ago
Comment by postsantum 5 days ago
Comment by zafka 5 days ago
Comment by rottencupcakes 5 days ago
Comment by stinkbeetle 4 days ago
The cost of raw coffee has nearly tripled in 18 months, that's what's driven the price increases. That has not been due to the cost of processing and shipping so much as poor coffee growing seasons in major growing areas reducing primary production. Though growing, processing, and transport inputs have all suffered a lot of inflation in the past 5 years too, to be sure.
Comment by rottencupcakes 2 days ago
Brazil is generally known for mass production low quality coffee grown at a lower altitude, which might be what you find in a can like grandparent said, but is less popular in the more premium scenes.
Comment by stopbulying 5 days ago
What about decaf only; 0.3% coffee?
Is decaf linked to slower biological aging, too?
Comment by ImHereToVote 5 days ago
Comment by DiabloD3 4 days ago
Comment by ImHereToVote 4 days ago
Comment by empressplay 5 days ago
Comment by micromacrofoot 5 days ago
Comment by brikym 5 days ago
Comment by lowdest 5 days ago
Comment by silisili 5 days ago
Sometime in my late 30s I started appreciating more nuanced flavors, including black coffee, but mostly vegetables like green beans, tomatoes, asparagus, peas, carrots. Once that happened, I started realizing how much food is blasted with so much salt that obliterates said flavors.
I assume it's mostly normal, as a kid I found my parents tastes bland...ew who could eat vegetables by themselves with no seasoning? Well, me now apparently...
Comment by ssl-3 5 days ago
There was a time when my diet was consistently full of very sweet things -- in particular, with beverages: More soda? Another mocha latte swimming in sugar? Another quart of orange juice? Yes, please.
But also food: How can a person walk past a selection of fresh donuts without having one?
Eventually, for reasons that initially were budgetary more than anything else, I discovered some coffee that I really liked the natural flavor of at a local place. I started getting that -- plain, black -- instead of a latte, mostly because $2.10 is a lot less than $3.75.
That coffee was Ethiopian Yirgacheffe. This particular one had its own distinct, subtle sweetness that hit the spot for me and was part of a basically-daily feel-good routine for years until their roaster stopped selling it.
But by then, I was a black coffee convert. And I didn't even notice at the time, but I'd also stopped buying soda in bulk -- it became a rare entity in my life instead of a daily fixation.
I also stopped buying things like cookies and donuts. I began to skip the pie at gatherings.
That all happened in my 30s.
Nowadays, motivated only by what I feel like eating or drinking instead of some desire to make healthy choices or something, my intake is good-tasting spring water (the tap water here sometimes tastes of mud), decent black coffee, inexpensive tea, and [of course] beer.
My food has taken a turn for the bland, too.
I buy carrots and celery at the store to munch on, instead of a bag of cookies. Things like rice and beans and fish have an abundance of flavor that I wasn't able to appreciate before. For gatherings, I make a big relish tray full of fresh vegetables -- and I munch on them more than anyone else does.
I seldom buy breakfast cereal now, but I used to eat a lot of it -- and I'd load it up with more sugar. Last year I did buy some store-brand raisin bran but I found that it was too much of a sugar bomb to really enjoy as a meal. I couldn't make myself finish it; most of it wound up in the compost. (I did find some very plain bran flakes that I liked a lot better -- 12-year-old me would not have been impressed.)
This is all a bit weird to describe because the only deliberate decision involved was to try to save a bit of money on coffee-house coffee in my 30s.
But did that decision actually have anything to do with it? Or is this instead a tale as old as time itself, wherein: Tastes simply change?
(But yeah, I do enjoy an occasional sugar bomb. But only literally-occasionally. For instance: A single 12-ounce bottle of Coke is very nice sometimes. I probably drink as many as 2 or 3 of those in a whole year.)
Comment by jagged-chisel 5 days ago
Comment by brikym 5 days ago
Comment by jama211 4 days ago
Comment by low_tech_punk 5 days ago
Comment by daniel_iversen 5 days ago
Comment by agnishom 5 days ago
Comment by Zambyte 5 days ago
Comment by a5c11 4 days ago
Comment by twodave 4 days ago
I think most baristas who do it for more than a year or two learn to not primarily be a coffee factory but first to make a positive impact on the people they see. The coffee is something that can be made consistent (and in a way, boring) through practice, but personal connection, especially when it is genuine, has a real draw.
Comment by jlaternman 4 days ago
Comment by nrhrjrjrjtntbt 5 days ago
Comment by aetherspawn 5 days ago
Comment by kuipferings 5 days ago
All of these studies are hot garbage, hopelessly confounded, the biggest scam in science is "controlling for".
Do an RCT and watch the coffee magic evaporate.
Comment by brokensegue 4 days ago
>Our study suggests the importance of further research investigating the role of coffee consumption in biological ageing.
Comment by jmonty900 5 days ago
Comment by jasoneckert 5 days ago
Comment by NegativeLatency 5 days ago
Comment by DaveZale 5 days ago
The rest of the day is another story, every day! Hopefully one of the better stories.
Comment by 0_____0 5 days ago
It's a lot of blueberries. But I can afford $60/month in frozen blueberries. Plus they're tasty. Also antioxidants or whatever.
Comment by onionisafruit 5 days ago
Comment by 0_____0 4 days ago
Comment by chickensong 5 days ago
Comment by ekjhgkejhgk 5 days ago
Comment by mattgreenrocks 5 days ago
Comment by esperent 5 days ago
If you can't do that, I've heard of people adding a sprinkle of baking soda as a buffer to black coffee. I'm not sure how much you'd need, probably just a tiny amount that you'd barely be able to taste.
Comment by mattgreenrocks 5 days ago
Comment by twodave 4 days ago
Comment by sunshinesnacks 5 days ago
Maybe it’s unrelated, all in my head, better beans, or the 3-4 oz of whole milk, but maybe give espresso drinks a try if you haven’t?
Comment by twodave 4 days ago
Comment by sunshinesnacks 3 days ago
Comment by senectus1 5 days ago
If I drink coffee my digestive system revolts in the the most disgusting ways. I miss it terribly, but its just not worth it.
Comment by mk89 5 days ago
- drink some water before the coffee
- ideally, don't drink it on an empty stomach
- use a dark roasted coffee, they are softer on the stomach (and way tastier)
Comment by dentemple 5 days ago
I'm basically a vampire now.
Comment by devilsdata 5 days ago
I reduced my coffee down to 1 espresso per day two months ago, and quit entirely two weeks ago. I'm still on stimulants, but Vyvanse treats ADHD much better and has fewer side-effects.
Comment by dns_snek 4 days ago
I think more people should give green or black tea a try, I found them to provide similar effects to coffee but with fewer side effects.
Comment by layer8 5 days ago
Comment by doubled112 5 days ago
Where does that put me? Caffeine poisoning or immortality with no in between?
Comment by lostlogin 5 days ago
Comment by doubled112 5 days ago
Comment by ekjhgkejhgk 5 days ago
> basically a vampire now.
Do you mean 2-3 liters?
Comment by bookofjoe 5 days ago
Comment by indubioprorubik 5 days ago
Comment by ares623 5 days ago
Comment by tug2024 5 days ago
Comment by NedF 5 days ago
Over the NHS recommended limit is better than zero caffeine for everyone. If their limit is correct is in question
Whether "those with severe mental illness" get more benefit seems unlikely biologically. But like everyone coffee is good for you.
The only point of research like this, since we know coffee is good, is finding the mechanisms. But it's highly open to p-hacking/experimental error, which is how universities work now. You should default to this is citation farming.
Comment by djaowjxj 3 days ago
Comment by nelox 5 days ago
Comment by tomhow 5 days ago
Comment by nelox 3 days ago
I don’t take articles at face value, especially when it comes to science reporting. Journalists often overstate or oversimplify studies, so I read the actual paper. I highlighted what it really says, what it doesn’t say, and what the article adds that isn’t in the study at all.
If an article misrepresents a paper’s core ideas, why shouldn’t that be called out? Misreporting confuses readers and undermines the authors’ work by failing to represent it accurately.
Comment by greekrich92 5 days ago
Comment by cheschire 5 days ago
Comment by renewiltord 5 days ago